{BS} Nancy Pelosi: Unemployment insurance creates jobs.
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: * ŞEBNEM FERAH-BEN ŞARKIMI SÖYLERKEN
Next: This is a f**king sperm whale in the Gulf of Mexico!!!!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Jul 2010 18:55 On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:31:49 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>It might mean that the people that have jobs can keep them. It is not >>'creating' jobs. > > One less unemployed person vs one person not unemployed. is such a huge > net difference in the local economy. Rada rada rada. Good. You are correct. One job *lost* can have an effect. One job *kept* is not "creating" jobs. Give up. You're over your head yet again.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Jul 2010 20:23 On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:06:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:45:21 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, > Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 14:35:21 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >> >>> Now I understand you cannot conceptualize the concept that not losing >>> jobs is the virtual equivalent of adding jobs but that is because you >>> are a wingnut and not an American. >> >>Off we go to LALA Land again. >> >>As usual, Aratzio adds 2+2 and comes up with Blue. >> >> > Like I said, the concept of virtual equivelence is lost on you. "Virtual Equivalence". Translation: "Once again I've been had, so we'll use some bullshit concept." > > Yes, it was incredibly obvious and carried not one subliminal or > insinuation so I am sure your ability to process English to Wingnut was > highly impeded. A job saved does not equal a job created. Period. > > > PS: You remember your whining about responding to the same post, > hypocrite? About you being as dumb as a stump? Audience removed.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Jul 2010 20:22 On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:06:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:45:21 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, > Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 14:35:21 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >> >>> Now I understand you cannot conceptualize the concept that not losing >>> jobs is the virtual equivalent of adding jobs but that is because you >>> are a wingnut and not an American. >> >>Off we go to LALA Land again. >> >>As usual, Aratzio adds 2+2 and comes up with Blue. >> >> > Like I said, the concept of virtual equivelence is lost on you. "Virtual Equivalence". Translation: "Once again I've been had, so we'll use some bullshit concept." > > Yes, it was incredibly obvious and carried not one subliminal or > insinuation so I am sure your ability to process English to Wingnut was > highly impeded. A job saved does not equal a job created. Period. > > > PS: You remember your whining about responding to the same post, > hypocrite? About you being as dumb as a stump? Audience removed.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Jul 2010 20:30 On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:19:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> Obvious lie. You are not overqualified for any job and most likely >>> underqualified and underintelligent for rag picking. >> >>I've worked for 4 Fortune 100 companies, two of them in the Fortune 10. > > Wow, that means you keep losing your job. You are younger than me and I > have changed jobs exactly 2 times in the last 36 years.But then I am > exceptional at what I do. Yeah. I bet you are. But, thanks to the Clintons, the places I worked for outsourced the jobs. And, rather than sit and fester in one place and probably realize "The Peter Principle", I reach for the Brass Ring. I'm betting people where you work refer to you as "that nasty old fossil soaking up a fat salary and building up a pension while we do all the work". As snuh says: Word. Audience removed
From: Jeff Strickland on 3 Jul 2010 21:40
"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore(a)databasix.com> wrote in message news:i0m33e$p4r$1(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com... >> > I'm fine with stopping unemployment payments if I get back all of the > unemployment taxes I've paid. Rethugs still think it's an > entitlement. > That doesn't even make sense. It's the Republicans that shut off the extension of unemployment benefits. And, you don't pay for unemployment insurance, the employer does. |