{BS} Let the taxes begin!
in [Toyota]
|
From: in2dadark on 28 Mar 2010 12:16 On Mar 24, 8:03 pm, "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: > What's new? The Democrats, the "party of the working man," gave the > working man EVER tax you can name. Now they even want to tax soda like the > beer they drink. LOL > > The biggest fraud on the working man are the taxes they are placing on the > corporations and the "rich" to pay for health care. Most or all of those > new taxes will be passed on to the working man in the form of higher prices, > fewer jobs and less money to invest in new jobs. > > "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > > news:hoe2qv$sl3$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > > > Something on the news about a "tanning" tax. > > > Democrats sure are inventive when it comes to taxing people!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - There's going to be a lot more subcontractors in the future. That will mean no employer provided health insurance, workman's comp OR unemployment comp.. Thank you Obamacare..
From: in2dadark on 28 Mar 2010 12:21 On Mar 26, 9:36 pm, SMS <scharf.ste...(a)geemail.com> wrote: > On 25/03/10 8:18 AM, dbu'' wrote: > > > In article<4bab70d5$0$16546$ce5e7...(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, > > "Mike Hunter"<Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: > > >> Will it still not be a Big Deal when YOUR taxes, and the costs of what YOU > >> buy go, up to pay just the interest on the trillions of dollars the > >> healthcare bill will cost your employer and he lays you off or sends you job > >> overseas? > > > I'm retired Mike and do not have anything to worry about. They would > > not dare to fuxx with us O.F.s, for we have the power of AARP, 40 > > million strong and would not hesitate to take the offending politicians > > to the wood shed for a good lesson in not fuxxing with the O.F.s. :) > > The AARP supported the health care bill because it was a net positive > for seniors, even though Medicare Advantage is going to be cut eventually.. > > OTOH, the AARP is not the political organization it once was. It has > become a marketing organization selling high-price car insurance and > property insurance to people that don't know any better. I'm not > retired, but as soon as I turned 50 they started mailing me stuff. I > joined for one year (free membership through Walgreen's). What a joke. > All the products they promote are a rip-off, _especially_ the insurance > products. We pay far less for auto and homeowners insurance that the > companies they are affiliated with charge. Any other discounts they > offer are no better than similar discounts available from other > organizations that don't charge for membership. Yep. They constantly want me to sell their medicare products. When I compare them to the ones I currently sell, I tell them no thanks; it's not worth the time to get licensed with them to end up selling nothing.
From: Mike Hunter on 28 Mar 2010 12:55 Obviously! Higher costs and higher taxes has always been eventually paid for by consumers. The problem is the Dims hide the costs of their giveaways so their dummy supporter do not see it happening. Just look at what are goofy left friends, like dr-Jeff, Joe $#itForBrains, the Stooges etc., are spouting in the NG. These dimwits, think government run health care is GOOD for them "in2dadark" <in2dadark(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:7e476e19-126e-485f-b9ee-5e532850d2b0(a)j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... On Mar 24, 8:03 pm, "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: > What's new? The Democrats, the "party of the working man," gave the > working man EVER tax you can name. Now they even want to tax soda like the > beer they drink. LOL > > The biggest fraud on the working man are the taxes they are placing on the > corporations and the "rich" to pay for health care. Most or all of those > new taxes will be passed on to the working man in the form of higher > prices, > fewer jobs and less money to invest in new jobs. > > "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > > news:hoe2qv$sl3$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > > > Something on the news about a "tanning" tax. > > > Democrats sure are inventive when it comes to taxing people!- Hide > > quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - There's going to be a lot more subcontractors in the future. That will mean no employer provided health insurance, workman's comp OR unemployment comp.. Thank you Obamacare..
From: Mike Hunter on 28 Mar 2010 13:11 The AARP was never good for seniors, they were only ever interested in selling them something, primary INSURANCE. This bill simply forces more people to buy from the insurance companies who they were telling everyone was the CAUSE of our healthcare problems. How stupid were these people to fall for all that BS from BO and the Dims in congress? "in2dadark" <in2dadark(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:a72d5826-757c-4fea-8b7d-d9fec879efca(a)q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com... On Mar 26, 9:36 pm, SMS <scharf.ste...(a)geemail.com> wrote: > On 25/03/10 8:18 AM, dbu'' wrote: > > > In article<4bab70d5$0$16546$ce5e7...(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, > > "Mike Hunter"<Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: > > >> Will it still not be a Big Deal when YOUR taxes, and the costs of what > >> YOU > >> buy go, up to pay just the interest on the trillions of dollars the > >> healthcare bill will cost your employer and he lays you off or sends > >> you job > >> overseas? > > > I'm retired Mike and do not have anything to worry about. They would > > not dare to fuxx with us O.F.s, for we have the power of AARP, 40 > > million strong and would not hesitate to take the offending politicians > > to the wood shed for a good lesson in not fuxxing with the O.F.s. :) > > The AARP supported the health care bill because it was a net positive > for seniors, even though Medicare Advantage is going to be cut eventually. > > OTOH, the AARP is not the political organization it once was. It has > become a marketing organization selling high-price car insurance and > property insurance to people that don't know any better. I'm not > retired, but as soon as I turned 50 they started mailing me stuff. I > joined for one year (free membership through Walgreen's). What a joke. > All the products they promote are a rip-off, _especially_ the insurance > products. We pay far less for auto and homeowners insurance that the > companies they are affiliated with charge. Any other discounts they > offer are no better than similar discounts available from other > organizations that don't charge for membership. Yep. They constantly want me to sell their medicare products. When I compare them to the ones I currently sell, I tell them no thanks; it's not worth the time to get licensed with them to end up selling nothing.
From: FridoLay on 28 Mar 2010 17:20
On 3/26/2010 11:43 PM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:35:06 -0400, FridoLay wrote: > >>>> Somebody's got to pay for the wars (actually, police actions) and the >>>> insane paranoia on the Canadian border. You think this *its's FREE?? >>> >>> >>> The taxes are part of the health care bill. >>> >>> >>> >> Which passed, which means more money coming in, which means bills get >> paid. It might be convenient but would be naive to think of it nicely >> apportioned for this and that. Last I heard, US infrastructure sux, it's >> million $/solder/per year. Quadruple that for incidentals + 1/2 again for >> the contractors we apparently need to do the job. You do the math. > > What does all this have to do with the new taxes for health care? > > > It's means: taxes are used to pay for government services. We've been using a LOT of government services lately. Now's as good a time as any to pay up. Sure it hurts, sure we all wish there were another way but we need to grin and bear it and, there isn't. |