From: Noddy on

"Was Istoben" <entshuldigen(a)oopla.com> wrote in message
news:4a9dc756(a)newsgate.x-privat.org...

> The operative word there is "claim." How much algae has been converted to
> biofuel to date? If there was anything to that claim, the lake I live on
> would be harvested for biofuel instead of the soybean field down the road.

What were you saying a few moments ago about understanding economics?

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: Was Istoben on

"Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message
news:4a9ddfef$0$93377$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net...
>
> "Was Istoben" <entshuldigen(a)oopla.com> wrote in message
> news:4a9dc756(a)newsgate.x-privat.org...
>
>> The operative word there is "claim." How much algae has been converted
>> to biofuel to date? If there was anything to that claim, the lake I live
>> on would be harvested for biofuel instead of the soybean field down the
>> road.
>
> What were you saying a few moments ago about understanding economics?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.
The part you apparently didn't understand? I see you snipped it. Coward.


From: Noddy on

"Was Istoben" <entshuldigen(a)oopla.com> wrote in message
news:4a9de286(a)newsgate.x-privat.org...

> The part you apparently didn't understand? I see you snipped it. Coward.

I snipped it because it was nothing other than a load of hypothetical
bullshit you idiot.

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: Was Istoben on

"Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message
news:4a9de49d$0$93375$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net...
>
> "Was Istoben" <entshuldigen(a)oopla.com> wrote in message
> news:4a9de286(a)newsgate.x-privat.org...
>
>> The part you apparently didn't understand? I see you snipped it.
>> Coward.
>
> I snipped it because it was nothing other than a load of hypothetical
> bullshit you idiot.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.
No, you snipped it because you are an intellectual coward. I'm amused by
the way you run from that which you cannot debate, leaving a few ignorant
curses in your wake.

From: F Murtz on
Was Istoben wrote:
>
> "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message
> news:4a9da711$0$93390$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net...
>>
>> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote in message
>> news:michelle-426C26.05264801092009(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>>> None are so blind as those who refuse to see.
>>
>> So you're saying hybrids *do* make economic sense?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Noddy.
> Only if you understand economics. For example, if everyone burned half
> as much gas, gas would cost much less than it does today. The cost of
> dealing with respiratory disorders would drop. The cost of dealing with
> climate change would drop. I could go on but you aren't going to think
> anyway so what's the point?
>

Rot,if everyone burned half as much fuel (gas) the cost to the end user
would cost the same as the tax component would go up.
the rest of your statement may or may not have some truth which may be
seen in the fullness of time.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Google Groups
Next: Prius does it again!