What did Toyota know, and when did they know it?
in [Toyota Prius]
|
From: Bob Cooper on 23 Feb 2010 18:35 In article <hm1nka$vm0$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Trueno(a)e86.GTS says... > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:12:35 -0600, Bob Cooper wrote: > > >> > >> And if 'you're not used to it', don't respond. Nobody says you have to. > >> But this is usenet, and that's why almost all news readers have Bozo > >> Bins. You can roll around with the few morons in there that have nothing > >> to say, but need to say it anyway. And why is there a whistling noise > >> attached with all your posts? > >> > >> HINT: Put some cotton balls in your ears... > > > > Seems you're the one who is disturbed by my postings. You are quite > > welcome to put me in your bin. But you're nuttier than I thought if you > > think I need, or would heed any advice from you. > > > They don't really bother me, except for the fact you're a foghorn that > needs to sound off even when it's not needed. White noise. Useless. > > Do you even know what a car is? > > Like I said. You don't have to respond. But you keep doing so anyway. > Waste case. But you'll keep running your yap, anyway. > > TTFN! Right. Just as you will. You remind me of Mike Hunter, except he doesn't repeat himself so often. And he seems a bit younger than you. Might be a wrong impression. But you certainly seem from your posts to have vast auto experience. Even more than Mike. I really like the ten or 15 times you've recounted not getting that HHR. Can you tell that story again? Almost seems that all your car experience has gifted you with the ability to actually motormouth. Oh, HHR, Corolla, Accura. 12 each. Many miles. Excellent quality. Great in the twistys. Some car stuff for you. Didn't mean to be too technical.
From: Clive on 23 Feb 2010 19:44 In message <hm12mh$91d$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, C. E. White <cewhite3(a)mindspring.com> writes > But German >electronics...well they suck. You're totally uneducated about Europe then. It's the Italian cars that have very unreliable electrics. Bosch has an enviable name in all things electronic and cars are no exception. May-be you're thinking about some American factory that is turning out Bosch supplies, over there with locally sourced rubbish parts. -- Clive.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 23 Feb 2010 23:49 On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:35:39 -0600, Bob Cooper wrote: >> Do you even know what a car is? >> >> Like I said. You don't have to respond. But you keep doing so anyway. >> Waste case. But you'll keep running your yap, anyway. >> >> TTFN! > > Right. Just as you will. > You remind me of Mike Hunter, except he doesn't repeat himself so often. > And he seems a bit younger than you. > Might be a wrong impression. But you certainly seem from your posts to > have vast auto experience. Even more than Mike. I really like the ten or > 15 times you've recounted not getting that HHR. Can you tell that story > again? Sure. every time I someone tells me I should have bought American. No problem. I guess you read all 15 times, eh? Good for you. You're not as stupid as you've been coming across. > Almost seems that all your car experience has gifted you with the ability > to actually motormouth. Likewise, I'm sure, buckethead. You sure don't have a lot to say, but just keep on pounding the keys. The best you can do is point out what a 'putz" I am? And how superiorily gifted you are? You have not yet said ONE thing to either add or detract from the original post except to point my 'weaknesses' out to me, and didn't even catch the joke in the original post without having to have it explained to you. Yeah, asshat, motormouth indeed. You have no point whatsoever, except the sharp one at the top of your head, Zippy.
From: Ashton Crusher on 24 Feb 2010 01:44 On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:54:30 -0500, Hachiroku <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:19:11 -0500, C. E. White wrote: > >>> Just what happened to Daimler and Chrysler, Daimler thought they >>> could boot-strap Chrysler into a maker of reliable cars for the >>> American market, instead Chrysler pulled Daimler down to it's level, >>> now after a messy divorce, Daimler's reliability is seriously in >>> question and they're having to through a lot of money at building >>> reliability and prestige again. >> >> Youa re going to have to explain to me how Chrysler pulled Daimler >> down to it's level. > > >Um, that's pretty much what happened. I don't know how. >It was something like a very good swimmer going out to rescue someone who >was drowning, and the drowner pulls the good swimmer under. It's nothing like that. Or will you claim that if two people go to dinner and one orders clams and the other gets a ham sandwich that if the guy who ordered the clams gets sick the guy will the ham sandwich will also have to go to the doctor??? That's why >Diamler dumped Chrysler on the market for comparatively pennies. Diamler >quality suffered during the partnership. > Chrysler was abused by MB. If problems developed they were due solely to MB own actions.
From: Clive on 24 Feb 2010 09:50
In message <uhi9o51jh1ht26t0qf5htbgg78la21gjap(a)4ax.com>, Ashton Crusher <demi(a)moore.net> writes >Chrysler was abused by MB. If problems developed they were due solely >to MB own actions. You've got the gall to criticize Toyota owners, have you ever heard of a biblical quotation sat say's "remove the plank from your own eye before condemning some with a speck in theirs"? -- Clive. |