Prev: Cars I've owned. (not proud of very many)
Next: 95 Camry ABS code 36
From: I M on 15 Nov 2009 19:28
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:56:08 +0000 (UTC), falk(a)mauve.rahul.net (Edward
A. Falk) wrote:

>In article <f758b4ad-723f-4c3a-8ba3-82461bf6c177(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
>Roger Coppock <rcoppock(a)adnc.com> wrote:
>>Yes, it's called, "spectroscopy." It's discussed and
>>demonstrated in introductory chemistry and astronomy
>>classes. ...
>
>You fool, spectroscopy is not in the bible, so it can't be real. Duh.
>Checkmate, athiests.


You are in the wrong newsgroup with such sarcasm,
but spectroscopy tells nothing about energy quantities.







From: James on 15 Nov 2009 21:16
I M @ good guy wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:56:08 +0000 (UTC), falk(a)mauve.rahul.net (Edward
> A. Falk) wrote:
>
>>In article
>><f758b4ad-723f-4c3a-8ba3-82461bf6c177(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
>>Roger Coppock <rcoppock(a)adnc.com> wrote:
>>>Yes, it's called, "spectroscopy." It's discussed and
>>>demonstrated in introductory chemistry and astronomy
>>>classes. ...
>>
>>You fool, spectroscopy is not in the bible, so it can't be real. Duh.
>>Checkmate, athiests.
>
>
> You are in the wrong newsgroup with such sarcasm,
> but spectroscopy tells nothing about energy quantities.

"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." - Nikola Tesla, 1934
From: I M on 15 Nov 2009 20:39
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:16:52 -0500, "James" <kingkongg(a)iglou.com> wrote:

>I M @ good guy wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:56:08 +0000 (UTC), falk(a)mauve.rahul.net (Edward
>> A. Falk) wrote:
>>
>>>In article
>>><f758b4ad-723f-4c3a-8ba3-82461bf6c177(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
>>>Roger Coppock <rcoppock(a)adnc.com> wrote:
>>>>Yes, it's called, "spectroscopy." It's discussed and
>>>>demonstrated in introductory chemistry and astronomy
>>>>classes. ...
>>>
>>>You fool, spectroscopy is not in the bible, so it can't be real. Duh.
>>>Checkmate, athiests.
>>
>>
>> You are in the wrong newsgroup with such sarcasm,
>> but spectroscopy tells nothing about energy quantities.
>
>"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." - Nikola Tesla, 1934


While Tesla had plenty of original thought and
some good technology, I consider him to be a little off. :-)






From: JoeSpareBedroom on 15 Nov 2009 21:41
"James" <kingkongg(a)iglou.com> wrote in message
news:4b00b60f$0$4061$d94e5ade(a)news.iglou.com...
I M @ good guy wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:56:08 +0000 (UTC), falk(a)mauve.rahul.net (Edward
> A. Falk) wrote:
>
>>In article
>><f758b4ad-723f-4c3a-8ba3-82461bf6c177(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
>>Roger Coppock <rcoppock(a)adnc.com> wrote:
>>>Yes, it's called, "spectroscopy." It's discussed and
>>>demonstrated in introductory chemistry and astronomy
>>>classes. ...
>>
>>You fool, spectroscopy is not in the bible, so it can't be real. Duh.
>>Checkmate, athiests.
>
>
> You are in the wrong newsgroup with such sarcasm,
> but spectroscopy tells nothing about energy quantities.

"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they
wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure
which has no relation to reality." - Nikola Tesla, 1934

======================

If I recall (from a book I read about 10 years ago), Tesla's quote referred
to his doubts about quantum mechanics, some of whose theories were purely
mathematical and could not be proven via experiment at the time. It's
somewhat devious to use his quote to imply that he would've had doubts about
spectroscopy.


From: mrbawana2u on 16 Nov 2009 07:50
On Nov 15, 9:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstr...(a)frontiernet.net>
wrote:
> "James" <kingko...(a)iglou.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4b00b60f$0$4061$d94e5ade(a)news.iglou.com...
> I M @ good guy wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:56:08 +0000 (UTC), f...(a)mauve.rahul.net (Edward
> > A. Falk) wrote:
>
> >>In article
> >><f758b4ad-723f-4c3a-8ba3-82461bf6c...(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
> >>Roger Coppock  <rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote:
> >>>Yes, it's called, "spectroscopy."  It's discussed and
> >>>demonstrated in introductory chemistry and astronomy
> >>>classes.  ...
>
> >>You fool, spectroscopy is not in the bible, so it can't be real.  Duh..
> >>Checkmate, athiests.
>
> >        You are in the wrong newsgroup with such sarcasm,
> > but spectroscopy tells nothing about energy quantities.
>
> "Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they
> wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure
> which has no relation to reality." - Nikola Tesla, 1934
>
> ======================
>
> If I recall (from a book I read about 10 years ago), Tesla's quote referred
> to his doubts about quantum mechanics, some of whose theories were purely
> mathematical and could not be proven via experiment at the time. It's
> somewhat devious to use his quote to imply that he would've had doubts about
> spectroscopy.

bit of a tard, ain't you, JoeShitEater?
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Cars I've owned. (not proud of very many)
Next: 95 Camry ABS code 36