Prev: Cars I've owned. (not proud of very many)
Next: 95 Camry ABS code 36
From: Jeff Strickland on 22 Nov 2009 20:48

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:VrrNm.18988$cd7.12419(a)newsfe04.iad...
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:he5aon$p47$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> news:OnpNm.18971$cd7.7907(a)newsfe04.iad...
>>>
>>>
>>> What methods and equipment would that expert use to determine that the
>>> sample was water?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ???
>>
>> I'm not sure what you're arguing,
>
> I noticed that.
>
>> but it appears that you are saying there is no water on the moon, despite
>> the scientific community saying there is.
>
> It appears you were drunk when you typed that.
>
>
>> I'd be interested in knowing why you think the scientific community is
>> wrong, and what methods and test equipment YOU use to determine the
>> sample was not water.
>
>
> How many messages did you read in this thread before you typed that?
>
>
>
>> I believe (but I have not read the book yet) that they used
>> spectrumography. This method of determining the chemical elements in
>> space is accepted, much the same way that gravity is accepted.
>
>
> No sober and non-hysterical adult has ever heard of spectrumography. What
> is that?
>

Only one. You said
<quote>
>>> What methods and equipment would that expert use to determine that the
>>> sample was water?

</quote>

That means to me that you question the science that says there is water on
the moon.

Spectrumography. Sorry, my mistake. Spectrometry is the word I was looking
for.






From: JoeSpareBedroom on 23 Nov 2009 07:15
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hecpm2$hbv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:VrrNm.18988$cd7.12419(a)newsfe04.iad...
>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:he5aon$p47$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>> news:OnpNm.18971$cd7.7907(a)newsfe04.iad...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What methods and equipment would that expert use to determine that the
>>>> sample was water?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ???
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what you're arguing,
>>
>> I noticed that.
>>
>>> but it appears that you are saying there is no water on the moon,
>>> despite the scientific community saying there is.
>>
>> It appears you were drunk when you typed that.
>>
>>
>>> I'd be interested in knowing why you think the scientific community is
>>> wrong, and what methods and test equipment YOU use to determine the
>>> sample was not water.
>>
>>
>> How many messages did you read in this thread before you typed that?
>>
>>
>>
>>> I believe (but I have not read the book yet) that they used
>>> spectrumography. This method of determining the chemical elements in
>>> space is accepted, much the same way that gravity is accepted.
>>
>>
>> No sober and non-hysterical adult has ever heard of spectrumography. What
>> is that?
>>
>
> Only one. You said
> <quote>
>>>> What methods and equipment would that expert use to determine that the
>>>> sample was water?
>
> </quote>
>
> That means to me that you question the science that says there is water on
> the moon.
>
> Spectrumography. Sorry, my mistake. Spectrometry is the word I was looking
> for.


When you first noticed the existence of this thread, you had two possible
options:

A) Read every single message in the thread before participating, so you'd
know who was saying what.

B) Jump in because you saw my messages, and end up looking silly because
you'd read no other messages.

You chose "B", which was the BAD option. Now go away.


First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Cars I've owned. (not proud of very many)
Next: 95 Camry ABS code 36