NASA says last decade hottest on record
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: online shopping
Next: car frum
From: dr_jeff on 1 Feb 2010 19:12 Mike Hunter wrote: > What has that to do with my statement that the advancement is so many things > in science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are > immeasurable? > > Look around you today at the things we have that are the direct result of > what the military and NASA did in their space programs. That doesn't mean that paying for more manned space flight is a good use of public funds, when space can be explored with robots. Jeff > "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message > news:I6idnX1DZer8yfrWnZ2dnUVZ_o9i4p2d(a)giganews.com... >> Mike Hunter wrote: >>> Leave it the BO to cut funds to one of the few government agencies that >>> actually does something RIGHT. The advancement is so many things in >>> science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are >>> immeasurable. What a disaster he has been for this county. >>> >>> The good thing is the Congress, as has been the case with EVERY OTHERS >>> Presidents annual budget request, will not enact his budget. The >>> Congress has always enacted it own budget so they get to buy your vote, >>> not the President ;) >> The cost of putting more women and men in space is not worth the benefits. >> It is far easier to explore the solar system with robots. >> >> Jeff > >
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 1 Feb 2010 14:37 On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:56:04 -0500, Mike Hunter wrote: > > Leave it the BO to cut funds to one of the few government agencies that > actually does something RIGHT. The advancement is so many things in > science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are > immeasurable. What a disaster he has been for this county. But he hasn't cut funding totally, he cut it and gave it a new mission: prove Global Warming.
From: Mike Hunter on 1 Feb 2010 19:52 How does one prove a negative? ;) "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2010.02.01.19.37.44.164700(a)e86.GTS... > On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:56:04 -0500, Mike Hunter wrote: > >> >> Leave it the BO to cut funds to one of the few government agencies that >> actually does something RIGHT. The advancement is so many things in >> science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are >> immeasurable. What a disaster he has been for this county. > > But he hasn't cut funding totally, he cut it and gave it a new mission: > prove Global Warming. > > >
From: Mike Hunter on 1 Feb 2010 19:57 In any event what Congressmen is going to vote to cut NASA JOBS in HIS district. Most every district benefits from what NASA does. Besides any cuts he has suggested are far out weighed by the TRILLIONS in NEW DEFICIT spending he is suggesting. "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message news:uqmdnSqV1f5H8PrWnZ2dnUVZ_tpi4p2d(a)giganews.com... > Mike Hunter wrote: >> What has that to do with my statement that the advancement is so many >> things in science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of >> NASA are immeasurable? >> >> Look around you today at the things we have that are the direct result of >> what the military and NASA did in their space programs. > > That doesn't mean that paying for more manned space flight is a good use > of public funds, when space can be explored with robots. > > Jeff > >> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >> news:I6idnX1DZer8yfrWnZ2dnUVZ_o9i4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>> Mike Hunter wrote: >>>> Leave it the BO to cut funds to one of the few government agencies that >>>> actually does something RIGHT. The advancement is so many things in >>>> science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are >>>> immeasurable. What a disaster he has been for this county. >>>> >>>> The good thing is the Congress, as has been the case with EVERY OTHERS >>>> Presidents annual budget request, will not enact his budget. The >>>> Congress has always enacted it own budget so they get to buy your vote, >>>> not the President ;) >>> The cost of putting more women and men in space is not worth the >>> benefits. It is far easier to explore the solar system with robots. >>> >>> Jeff >>
From: dr_jeff on 1 Feb 2010 20:19
Mike Hunter wrote: > In any event what Congressmen is going to vote to cut NASA JOBS in HIS > district. Most every district benefits from what NASA does. Besides any > cuts he has suggested are far out weighed by the TRILLIONS in NEW DEFICIT > spending he is suggesting. Is the proposed NASA budget higher for 2011 than it is for 2010? Yes, the proposed budget it higher. Jeff > "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message > news:uqmdnSqV1f5H8PrWnZ2dnUVZ_tpi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >> Mike Hunter wrote: >>> What has that to do with my statement that the advancement is so many >>> things in science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of >>> NASA are immeasurable? >>> >>> Look around you today at the things we have that are the direct result of >>> what the military and NASA did in their space programs. >> That doesn't mean that paying for more manned space flight is a good use >> of public funds, when space can be explored with robots. >> >> Jeff >> >>> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >>> news:I6idnX1DZer8yfrWnZ2dnUVZ_o9i4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>>> Mike Hunter wrote: >>>>> Leave it the BO to cut funds to one of the few government agencies that >>>>> actually does something RIGHT. The advancement is so many things in >>>>> science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are >>>>> immeasurable. What a disaster he has been for this county. >>>>> >>>>> The good thing is the Congress, as has been the case with EVERY OTHERS >>>>> Presidents annual budget request, will not enact his budget. The >>>>> Congress has always enacted it own budget so they get to buy your vote, >>>>> not the President ;) >>>> The cost of putting more women and men in space is not worth the >>>> benefits. It is far easier to explore the solar system with robots. >>>> >>>> Jeff > |