Prev: online shopping
Next: car frum
From: dr_jeff on 23 Jan 2010 06:24 http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/temp-analysis-2009.html http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/science/earth/22warming.html?hpw
From: in2dadark on 23 Jan 2010 13:30 On Jan 23, 6:24 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote: > http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/temp-analysis-2009.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/science/earth/22warming.html?hpw I don't need nasa for that. I agree it's hotter. But I don't know why it has to be a red or blue issue... It's hotter in the winters here in Fla now. I've used the AC more this winter than any I can remember. If it keeps up I don't think real estate will be worth much down here in another decade, especially if they have another summer like the last one.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 23 Jan 2010 12:48 On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:24:42 -0500, dr_jeff wrote: > http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/temp-analysis-2009.html > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/science/earth/22warming.html?hpw Wow. It got out NASA, the IPCC et al have tainted data, and you're still drinking the K00L-Aid. Amazing.
From: Mike Hunter on 23 Jan 2010 19:32 Search "James E Hansen, Debunked" and "How can CO2, a gas that comprise less than one half of one percent of our atmosphere effect the temperature of the earth, up or down" THEN decide WBMA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [See: Peer-Reviewed Study challenges 'notion that human emissions are responsible for global warming' & New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears ]. Washington DC, Jan 27th 2009: NASA warming scientist James Hansen, one of former Vice-President Al Gore's closest allies in the promotion of man-made global warming fears, is being publicly rebuked by his former supervisor at NASA. Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist, Dr. John S. Theon, the former supervisor of James Hansen, NASA's vocal man-made global warming fear soothsayer, has now publicly declared himself a skeptic and declared that Hansen "embarrassed NASA" with his alarming climate claims and said Hansen was "was never muzzled." Theon joins the rapidly growing ranks of international scientists abandoning the promotion of man-made global warming fears. "I appreciate the opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that global warming is man made," Theon wrote to the Minority Office at the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 15, 2009. "I was, in effect, Hansen's supervisor because I had to justify his funding, allocate his resources, and evaluate his results," Theon, the former Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA Headquarters and former Chief of the Atmospheric Dynamics & Radiation Branch explained. "Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA's official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind's effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress," Theon wrote. [Note: NASA scientist James Hansen has created worldwide media frenzy with his dire climate warning, his call for trials against those who dissent against man-made global warming fear, and his claims that he was allegedly muzzled by the Bush administration despite doing 1,400 on-the-job media interviews! - See: Don't Panic Over Predictions of Climate Doom - Get the Facts on James Hansen - UK Register: Veteran climate scientist says 'lock up the oil men' - June 23, 2008 & UK Guardian: NASA scientist calls for putting oil firm chiefs on trial for 'high crimes against humanity' for spreading doubt about man-made global warming - June 23, 2008 ] Theon declared "climate models are useless." "My own belief concerning anthropogenic climate change is that the models do not realistically simulate the climate system because there are many very important sub-grid scale processes that the models either replicate poorly or completely omit," Theon explained. "Furthermore, some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results. In doing so, they neither explain what they have modified in the observations, nor explain how they did it. They have resisted making their work transparent so that it can be replicated independently by other scientists. This is clearly contrary to how science should be done. Thus there is no rational justification for using climate model forecasts to determine public policy," he added. "As Chief of several of NASA Headquarters' programs (1982-94), an SES position, I was responsible for all weather and climate research in the entire agency, including the research work by James Hansen, Roy Spencer, Joanne Simpson, and several hundred other scientists at NASA field centers, in academia, and in the private sector who worked on climate research," Theon wrote of his career. "This required a thorough understanding of the state of the science. I have kept up with climate science since retiring by reading books and journal articles," Theon added. (LINK) Theon also co-authored the book "Advances in Remote Sensing Retrieval Methods." [Note: Theon joins many current and former NASA scientists in dissenting from man-made climate fears. A small sampling includes: Aerospace engineer and physicist Dr. Michael Griffin, the former top administrator of NASA, Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology, and formerly of NASA, Geophysicist Dr. Phil Chapman, an astronautical engineer and former NASA astronaut, Award-Winning NASA Astronaut/Geologist and Moonwalker Jack Schmitt, Award-winning NASA Astronaut and Physicist Walter Cunningham of NASA's Apollo 7, Chemist and Nuclear Engineer Robert DeFayette was formerly with NASA's Plum Brook Reactor, Hungarian Ferenc Miskolczi, an atmospheric physicist with 30 years of experience and a former researcher with NASA's Ames Research Center, Climatologist Dr. John Christy, Climatologist Dr. Roy W. Spencer, Atmospheric Scientist Ross Hays of NASA's Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility] Gore faces a much different scientific climate in 2009 than the one he faced in 2006 when his film "An Inconvenient Truth" was released. According to satellite data, the Earth has cooled since Gore's film was released, Antarctic sea ice extent has grown to record levels, sea level rise has slowed, ocean temperatures have failed to warm, and more and more scientists have publicly declared their dissent from man-made climate fears as peer-reviewed studies continue to man-made counter warming fears. "Vice President Gore and the other promoters of man-made climate fears endless claims that the "debate is over" appear to be ignoring scientific reality," Senator James Inhofe, Ranking Member of the Environment & Public Works Committee. A U.S. Senate Minority Report released in December 2008 details over 650 international scientists who are dissenting from man-made global warming fears promoted by the UN and yourself. Many of the scientists profiled are former UN IPCC scientists and former believers in man-made climate change that have reversed their views in recent years. The report continues to grow almost daily. We have just received a request from an Italian scientist, and a Czech scientist to join the 650 dissenting scientists report. A chemist from the U.S. Naval Academy is about to be added, and more Japanese scientists are dissenting. Finally, many more meteorologists will be added and another former UN IPCC scientist is about to be included. These scientists are openly rebelling against the climate orthodoxy promoted by Gore and the UN IPCC. The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists' equivalent of the Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. Reports from the conference found that Skeptical scientists overwhelmed the meeting, with '2/3 of presenters and question-askers hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC' ( See full reports here & here ] In addition, a 2008 canvass of more than 51,000 Canadian scientists revealed 68% disagree that global warming science is "settled." A November 25, 2008, article in Politico noted that a "growing accumulation" of science is challenging warming fears, and added that the "science behind global warming may still be too shaky to warrant cap-and-trade legislation." More evidence that the global warming fear machine is breaking down. Russian scientists "rejected the very idea that carbon dioxide may be responsible for global warming". An American Physical Society editor conceded that a "considerable presence" of scientific skeptics exists. An International team of scientists countered the UN IPCC, declaring: "Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate". India Issued a report challenging global warming fears. International Scientists demanded the UN IPCC "be called to account and cease its deceptive practices." The scientists and peer-reviewed studies countering climate claims are the key reason that the U.S. public has grown ever more skeptical of man-made climate doom predictions. [See: Global warming ranks dead last, 20 out of 20 in new Pew survey. Pew Survey: & Survey finds majority of U.S. Voters - '51% - now believe that humans are not the predominant cause of climate change' - January 20, 2009 - Rasmussen Reports ] The chorus of skeptical scientific voices grow louder in 2008 as a steady stream of peer-reviewed studies, analyses, real world data and inconvenient developments challenged the UN's and former Vice President Al Gore's claims that the "science is settled" and there is a "consensus." On a range of issues, 2008 proved to be challenging for the promoters of man-made climate fears. Promoters of anthropogenic warming fears endured the following: Global temperatures failing to warm; Peer-reviewed studies predicting a continued lack of warming; a failed attempt to revive the discredited "Hockey Stick"; inconvenient developments and studies regarding rising CO2; the Spotless Sun; Clouds; Antarctica; the Arctic; Greenland's ice; Mount Kilimanjaro; Global sea ice; Causes of Hurricanes; Extreme Storms; Extinctions; Floods; Droughts; Ocean Acidification; Polar Bears; Extreme weather deaths; Frogs; lack of atmospheric dust; Malaria; the failure of oceans to warm and rise as predicted. # # # ORIGINAL FULL TEXT LETTER SENT VIA EMAILS: --Original Message-- From: Jtheon [mailto:jtheon(a)XXXXXXX] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:05 PM To: Morano, Marc (EPW) Subject: Climate models are useless Marc, First, I sent several e-mails to you with an error in the address and they have been returned to me. So I'm resending them in one combined e-mail. Yes, one could say that I was, in effect, Hansen's supervisor because I had to justify his funding, allocate his resources, and evaluate his results. I did not have the authority to give him his annual performance evaluation. He was never muzzled even though he violated NASA's official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind's effect on it). He thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress. My own belief concerning anthropogenic climate change is that the models do not realistically simulate the climate system because there are many very important sub-grid scale processes that the models either replicate poorly or completely omit. Furthermore, some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results. In doing so, they neither explain what they have modified in the observations, nor explain how they did it. They have resisted making their work transparent so that it can be replicated independently by other scientists. This is clearly contrary to how science should be done. Thus there is no rational justification for using climate model forecasts to determine public policy. With best wishes, John # # From: Jtheon [mailto:jtheon(a)XXXXXX] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:50 PM To: Morano, Marc (EPW) Subject: Re: Nice seeing you Marc, Indeed, it was a pleasure to see you again. I appreciate the opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that Global Warming is man made. A brief bio follows. Use as much or as little of it as you wish. John S. Theon Education: B.S. Aero. Engr. (1953-57); Aerodynamicist, Douglas Aircraft Co. (1957-58); As USAF Reserve Officer (1958-60),B.S. Meteorology (1959); Served as Weather Officer 1959-60; M.S, Meteorology (1960-62); NASA Research Scientist, Goddard Space Flight Ctr. (1962-74); Head Meteorology Branch, GSFC (1974-76); Asst. Chief, Lab. for Atmos. Sciences, GSFC (1977-78); Program Scientist, NASA Global Weather Research Program, NASA Hq. (1978-82); Chief, Atmospheric Dynamics & Radiation Branch NASA Hq., (1982-91); Ph.D., Engr. Science & Mech.: course of study and dissertation in atmos. science (1983-85); Chief, Atmospheric Dynamics, Radiation, & Hydrology Branch, NASA Hq. (1991-93); Chief, Climate Processes Research Program, NASA Hq. (1993-94); Senior Scientist, Mission to Planet Earth Office, NASA Hq. (1994-95); Science Consultant, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (1995-99); Science Consultant Orbital Sciences Corp. (1996-97) and NASA Jet Propulsion Lab., (1997-99). As Chief of several NASA Hq. Programs (1982-94), an SES position, I was responsible for all weather and climate research in the entire agency, including the research work by James Hansen, Roy Spencer, Joanne Simpson, and several hundred other scientists at NASA field centers, in academia, and in the private sector who worked on climate research. This required a thorough understanding of the state of the science. I have kept up with climate science since retiring by reading books and journal articles. I hope that this is helpful. Best wishes, John -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Possibly related posts: (automatically generated) a.. Dr. James Hansen of NASA GISS arrested b.. NASA's Hansen Reaches Escape Velocity By James Lewis c.. Fixing Science "The atmosphere is a mixture of nitrogen (78%), oxygen (21%), and all the other gases (1%) that surrounds. The balance is moisture Earth. High above the planet, the atmosphere becomes thinner until it gradually reaches space. It is divided into five layers." "People usually describe the temperature as hot or cold. The real definition of temperature is the measure of the average speed of air molecules." "Even though temperature changes every day and every season, the Earth's average temperature is always in the right range to support life. "Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a kind of gas, that comprises less than 1% (.004) of the atmosphere. That isn't that much carbon dioxide in but it is still important. Carbon dioxide is one of the Greenhouse gas the helps trap heat coming from the Sun in our atmosphere through the greenhouse effect Without the gasses in our air, the Earth would much colder." "Moisture can be found in the form of Ice, Water, Vapor and Ions in the Troposphere" "The Troposphere is the first level of the atmosphere and where all of the moisture is found and it has the greatest single effect on the temperature" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message news:mO2dncOb9ebnQcfWnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/temp-analysis-2009.html > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/science/earth/22warming.html?hpw
From: Mike Hunter on 23 Jan 2010 19:35
You should have been around in the Thirties if that is what you want to believe. As to the temperature in Florida, just a week or so ago it was 34 degrees at my place in Key West, the lowest temperature ever recorded here "in2dadark" <in2dadark(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f37bd34e-7396-4656-b931-9afc5c9a9b85(a)b10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On Jan 23, 6:24 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote: > http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/temp-analysis-2009.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/science/earth/22warming.html?hpw I don't need nasa for that. I agree it's hotter. But I don't know why it has to be a red or blue issue... It's hotter in the winters here in Fla now. I've used the AC more this winter than any I can remember. If it keeps up I don't think real estate will be worth much down here in another decade, especially if they have another summer like the last one. |