NASA says last decade hottest on record
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: online shopping
Next: car frum
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 29 Jan 2010 13:50 On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:24:42 -0500, dr_jeff wrote: > http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/temp-analysis-2009.html > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/science/earth/22warming.html?hpw And this is from the now official voice of Global Warming in the US! NASA: What the hell is Space, anyway?!?!?! GO OBAMA!!!!
From: dr_jeff on 30 Jan 2010 07:36 C. E. White wrote: > http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=175b568a-802a-23ad-4c69-9bdd978fb3cd > > http://www.iceagenow.com/ > http://www.theresilientearth.com/?q=content/himalayan-glaciers-not-melting > http://www.c3headlines.com/arcticgreenlandantarcticglacierssea-ice/ > http://spacejournal.ohio.edu/issue16/strickland1.html Thanks for showing examples of bad science.
From: Mike Hunter on 30 Jan 2010 13:40 Our friend dr_jeff, KNOWS global warming GOOD, all other scientists lie. LOL "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message news:hrudnVvZoopXuvnWnZ2dnUVZ_uRi4p2d(a)giganews.com... > C. E. White wrote: >> http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=175b568a-802a-23ad-4c69-9bdd978fb3cd >> http://www.iceagenow.com/ >> http://www.theresilientearth.com/?q=content/himalayan-glaciers-not-melting >> http://www.c3headlines.com/arcticgreenlandantarcticglacierssea-ice/ >> http://spacejournal.ohio.edu/issue16/strickland1.html > > Thanks for showing examples of bad science.
From: dr_jeff on 1 Feb 2010 17:23 Mike Hunter wrote: > Leave it the BO to cut funds to one of the few government agencies that > actually does something RIGHT. The advancement is so many things in > science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are > immeasurable. What a disaster he has been for this county. > > The good thing is the Congress, as has been the case with EVERY OTHERS > Presidents annual budget request, will not enact his budget. The Congress > has always enacted it own budget so they get to buy your vote, not the > President ;) The cost of putting more women and men in space is not worth the benefits. It is far easier to explore the solar system with robots. Jeff
From: Mike Hunter on 1 Feb 2010 19:09
What has that to do with my statement that the advancement is so many things in science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are immeasurable? Look around you today at the things we have that are the direct result of what the military and NASA did in their space programs. "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message news:I6idnX1DZer8yfrWnZ2dnUVZ_o9i4p2d(a)giganews.com... > Mike Hunter wrote: >> Leave it the BO to cut funds to one of the few government agencies that >> actually does something RIGHT. The advancement is so many things in >> science, industry and medicine that are the direct result of NASA are >> immeasurable. What a disaster he has been for this county. >> >> The good thing is the Congress, as has been the case with EVERY OTHERS >> Presidents annual budget request, will not enact his budget. The >> Congress has always enacted it own budget so they get to buy your vote, >> not the President ;) > > The cost of putting more women and men in space is not worth the benefits. > It is far easier to explore the solar system with robots. > > Jeff |