More Anti-Immigrant Wingnut Fail
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Aug 2010 19:32 On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:14:54 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:11:34 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, > Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for > writing: > >>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:00:06 -0500, RD Sandman wrote: >> >>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in >>> news:jkfu561vrao25nlupbncjq30f2siu6a5ka(a)4ax.com: >>> >>>> On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 13:05:37 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, RD >>>> Sandman <rdsandman(a)comcast[remove].net> got double secret probation >>>> for writing: >>>> >>>>>"Mike" <mikehunt2(a)lycos.com> wrote in >>>>>news:1MadneVoX71fKsDRnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d(a)ptd.net: >>>>> >>>>>> Post her picture so we can decide if she is a beautiful animal or not >>>>>> ;) >>>>> >>>>>Of the goat? Aratzio has it in his wallet. >>>> >>>> Says the goat pimp. >>> >>> You have my apology, it was an unwarranted statement on my part. >> >>But true nonetheless. >> >> > You really are almost too stupid for words. No, you're too stupid to understand words, goat pimp.
From: ah on 9 Aug 2010 19:45 On 8/8/2010 8:15 PM, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:19:52 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah > <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On 8/4/2010 8:09 PM, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:18:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>>>You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only people >>>>>>>that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and they're at least >>>>>>>as fucked up as you are. >>>>>> >>>>>> To prove his ignorance the fucklump doubles down on the Ad Hominem >>>>>> thus avoiding discussion of facts. >>>>> >>>>>Who are you narrating to, Chowderhead? >>>> >>>> Whomever wishes to read my fun. Does there have to be a set audience >>>> or does the concept of a one-to-many communications platform boggle >>>> your simple mind? >>> >>> You've pretty much been killfiled by most on Usenet. Only a few read your >>> idiotic rantings, and most of them are luaghing at you. >> >>Pot. Kettle. Black. >> > > You too are obviously drunk. On the unrequited yearnings of the incurable lonely seeking solace in the digital age... -- a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h
From: Aratzio on 9 Aug 2010 20:49 On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:45:22 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, ah <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >On 8/8/2010 8:15 PM, Aratzio wrote: >> On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:19:52 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah >> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On 8/4/2010 8:09 PM, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:18:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only people >>>>>>>>that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and they're at least >>>>>>>>as fucked up as you are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To prove his ignorance the fucklump doubles down on the Ad Hominem >>>>>>> thus avoiding discussion of facts. >>>>>> >>>>>>Who are you narrating to, Chowderhead? >>>>> >>>>> Whomever wishes to read my fun. Does there have to be a set audience >>>>> or does the concept of a one-to-many communications platform boggle >>>>> your simple mind? >>>> >>>> You've pretty much been killfiled by most on Usenet. Only a few read your >>>> idiotic rantings, and most of them are luaghing at you. >>> >>>Pot. Kettle. Black. >>> >> >> You too are obviously drunk. > >On the unrequited yearnings of the incurable lonely seeking solace in the >digital age... RALPH
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Aug 2010 22:38 On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:27:22 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>As drunkeness will you. >> >> > I can point to factual proof of your petulence and the best you can do > iw whine Um, yeah...
From: Aratzio on 10 Aug 2010 18:33
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:38:11 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:27:22 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>As drunkeness will you. >>> >>> >> I can point to factual proof of your petulence and the best you can do >> iw whine > >Um, yeah... > > What no "yer drunk"? Really, that was working so well for you. |