From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:44:36 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

>>> The latter are not illegal immigrants, since they are not immigrating,
>>
>>Some of them are. It is sometimes the price one pays for the coyote.
>
> So, now we slice that pie even smaller. As in a statistically
> insignificant slice.
>
> Illegal immigrants are not a crime problem

You really need to rethink this. Seriously...



From: Aratzio on
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 19:04:35 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:44:36 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>> The latter are not illegal immigrants, since they are not immigrating,
>>>
>>>Some of them are. It is sometimes the price one pays for the coyote.
>>
>> So, now we slice that pie even smaller. As in a statistically
>> insignificant slice.
>>
>> Illegal immigrants are not a crime problem
>
>You really need to rethink this. Seriously...
>
>
Go ahead, make you case, since in that same discussion we dealt with
the clearly obvious fact cossing the boarder is illegal, make your
case that the crime rate of illegal immigrants is a threat to the
citizenry of the USA.

You won't, all you will have are single incidents, retard.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:04:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

>>> So, now we slice that pie even smaller. As in a statistically
>>> insignificant slice.
>>>
>>> Illegal immigrants are not a crime problem
>>
>>You really need to rethink this. Seriously...
>>
>>
> Go ahead, make you case, since in that same discussion we dealt with
> the clearly obvious fact cossing the boarder is illegal

That is the point, you drunken sot.



From: Aratzio on
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 01:22:34 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:04:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>> So, now we slice that pie even smaller. As in a statistically
>>>> insignificant slice.
>>>>
>>>> Illegal immigrants are not a crime problem
>>>
>>>You really need to rethink this. Seriously...
>>>
>>>
>> Go ahead, make you case, since in that same discussion we dealt with
>> the clearly obvious fact cossing the boarder is illegal, make your
>> case that the crime rate of illegal immigrants is a threat to the
>> citizenry of the USA.
>>
>> You won't, all you will have are single incidents, retard.
>
>That is the point, you drunken sot.
>
>
So, you snip all the parts where that is discussed by RD and myself
and pretend you have some new point to make that is exactly the points
that had already been dealt with.

Really, that is tragically stupid. I am sure RD loves having morons
come to his aid.

Then you snip the actual point of the conversation between adults and
pretend that didn't exist either.

I guess in your world nothing is too stupid for you to attempt.

From: ah on
On 8/4/2010 8:09 PM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:18:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>>>You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only people
>>>>>that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and they're at least
>>>>>as fucked up as you are.
>>>>
>>>> To prove his ignorance the fucklump doubles down on the Ad Hominem
>>>> thus avoiding discussion of facts.
>>>
>>>Who are you narrating to, Chowderhead?
>>
>> Whomever wishes to read my fun. Does there have to be a set audience
>> or does the concept of a one-to-many communications platform boggle
>> your simple mind?
>
> You've pretty much been killfiled by most on Usenet. Only a few read your
> idiotic rantings, and most of them are luaghing at you.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

>
>>
>>>
>>>Hint: no on is listening to you...
>>>
>>>
>> What if Pandora chimes in, or Fred, or Ah?
>
> They matter...why? Fred occasionally has a sentient thought.
> "Thought" is as foreign to pandora as she is to the US.


--
a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h