From: Aratzio on
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:03:00 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio,
grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret
probation for writing:

>=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote
>in news:F8X5o.56446$YX3.51560(a)newsfe18.iad:
>
>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:02:28 -0500, Gray Ghost wrote:
>>
>>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>>> wrote in news:UNJ5o.48002$xZ2.40686(a)newsfe07.iad:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:32:38 -0400, ah wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only
>>>>>> people that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and
>>>>>> they're at least as fucked up as you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other than a plaything, you're fairly useless.
>>>>>
>>>>> It must really thrill you to imagine what dominance means.
>>>>
>>>> Oops. I guess there is someone who cares what you say!
>>>>
>>>> But, who cares what he says?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> He certainly doesn't seem erudite, does he?
>>
>> Um, which one? I don't think that fits either of them at all.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Both

Attributions are key here, which ones are you pointing to?

As for erudition, does a single word response define erudition to you?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:02:26 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

>>You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only people
>>that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and they're at least
>>as fucked up as you are.
>
> To prove his ignorance the fucklump doubles down on the Ad Hominem
> thus avoiding discussion of facts.

Who are you narrating to, Chowderhead?

Hint: no on is listening to you...



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:59:56 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:54:49 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>
>>On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:44:56 -0500, pandora wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:55:16 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:32:38 -0400, ah wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only
>>>>>> people that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and they're
>>>>>> at least as fucked up as you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other than a plaything, you're fairly useless.
>>>>>
>>>>> It must really thrill you to imagine what dominance means.
>>>>
>>>> Oops. I guess there is someone who cares what you say!
>>>>
>>>> But, who cares what he says?
>>>
>>> Obviously, you do or you wouldn't have responded.
>>
>>Likewise, I'm sure.
>
> "I know you are but what am I"
>
> Here is your free clue for the evening:
> Only you were whinging about "who cares".

Who's 'whinging'? Nobody really cares, Chowderhead.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:10:17 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:03:00 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio,
> grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret
> probation for writing:
>
>>=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote
>>in news:F8X5o.56446$YX3.51560(a)newsfe18.iad:
>>
>>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:02:28 -0500, Gray Ghost wrote:
>>>
>>>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>>>> wrote in news:UNJ5o.48002$xZ2.40686(a)newsfe07.iad:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:32:38 -0400, ah wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only
>>>>>>> people that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and
>>>>>>> they're at least as fucked up as you are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other than a plaything, you're fairly useless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It must really thrill you to imagine what dominance means.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops. I guess there is someone who cares what you say!
>>>>>
>>>>> But, who cares what he says?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He certainly doesn't seem erudite, does he?
>>>
>>> Um, which one? I don't think that fits either of them at all.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Both
>
> Attributions are key here, which ones are you pointing to?
>
> As for erudition, does a single word response define erudition to you?

Ooops. I guess he was talking about you afterall, Chowderhead.



From: Aratzio on
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 02:06:25 +0000 (UTC), in the land of alt.aratzio,
Meat Plow <mhywatt(a)yahoo.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:59:56 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:54:49 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:44:56 -0500, pandora wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:55:16 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:32:38 -0400, ah wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only
>>>>>>> people that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and
>>>>>>> they're at least as fucked up as you are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other than a plaything, you're fairly useless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It must really thrill you to imagine what dominance means.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops. I guess there is someone who cares what you say!
>>>>>
>>>>> But, who cares what he says?
>>>>
>>>> Obviously, you do or you wouldn't have responded.
>>>
>>>Likewise, I'm sure.
>>
>> "I know you are but what am I"
>>
>> Here is your free clue for the evening: Only you were whinging about
>> "who cares".
>
>Nice way 'not' to whine. :(

Feel free to diagram any sentence you feel was whining and demonstrate
your superior intellect and understanding of the English language.

I'll wait for your standard backpedal/avoidance.

>
>
>...heh

Ad the Meat Plow stupidity special, the follow-ups set to email.
:Followup-To: poster
Wow, you must be really having a tough time, that was more pathetic
than your usual fare.

hehindeedy.

Coming up soon, "Jes Trollin' Guv"