From: Aratzio on 3 Aug 2010 22:10 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:03:00 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret probation for writing: >=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote >in news:F8X5o.56446$YX3.51560(a)newsfe18.iad: > >> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:02:28 -0500, Gray Ghost wrote: >> >>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>> wrote in news:UNJ5o.48002$xZ2.40686(a)newsfe07.iad: >>> >>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:32:38 -0400, ah wrote: >>>> >>>>>> You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only >>>>>> people that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and >>>>>> they're at least as fucked up as you are. >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than a plaything, you're fairly useless. >>>>> >>>>> It must really thrill you to imagine what dominance means. >>>> >>>> Oops. I guess there is someone who cares what you say! >>>> >>>> But, who cares what he says? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> He certainly doesn't seem erudite, does he? >> >> Um, which one? I don't think that fits either of them at all. >> >> >> >> > >Both Attributions are key here, which ones are you pointing to? As for erudition, does a single word response define erudition to you?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Aug 2010 22:46 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:02:26 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only people >>that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and they're at least >>as fucked up as you are. > > To prove his ignorance the fucklump doubles down on the Ad Hominem > thus avoiding discussion of facts. Who are you narrating to, Chowderhead? Hint: no on is listening to you...
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Aug 2010 22:47 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:59:56 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:54:49 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, > Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for > writing: > >>On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:44:56 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:55:16 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:32:38 -0400, ah wrote: >>>> >>>>>> You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only >>>>>> people that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and they're >>>>>> at least as fucked up as you are. >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than a plaything, you're fairly useless. >>>>> >>>>> It must really thrill you to imagine what dominance means. >>>> >>>> Oops. I guess there is someone who cares what you say! >>>> >>>> But, who cares what he says? >>> >>> Obviously, you do or you wouldn't have responded. >> >>Likewise, I'm sure. > > "I know you are but what am I" > > Here is your free clue for the evening: > Only you were whinging about "who cares". Who's 'whinging'? Nobody really cares, Chowderhead.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Aug 2010 22:48 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:10:17 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:03:00 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, > grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret > probation for writing: > >>=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote >>in news:F8X5o.56446$YX3.51560(a)newsfe18.iad: >> >>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:02:28 -0500, Gray Ghost wrote: >>> >>>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>>> wrote in news:UNJ5o.48002$xZ2.40686(a)newsfe07.iad: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:32:38 -0400, ah wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only >>>>>>> people that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and >>>>>>> they're at least as fucked up as you are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Other than a plaything, you're fairly useless. >>>>>> >>>>>> It must really thrill you to imagine what dominance means. >>>>> >>>>> Oops. I guess there is someone who cares what you say! >>>>> >>>>> But, who cares what he says? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> He certainly doesn't seem erudite, does he? >>> >>> Um, which one? I don't think that fits either of them at all. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>Both > > Attributions are key here, which ones are you pointing to? > > As for erudition, does a single word response define erudition to you? Ooops. I guess he was talking about you afterall, Chowderhead.
From: Aratzio on 3 Aug 2010 23:01
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 02:06:25 +0000 (UTC), in the land of alt.aratzio, Meat Plow <mhywatt(a)yahoo.com> got double secret probation for writing: >On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:59:56 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:54:49 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, >> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:44:56 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:55:16 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:32:38 -0400, ah wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> You aren't relevant. Nobody really cares what you say.. The only >>>>>>> people that pay any attention to you are pandora and fred, and >>>>>>> they're at least as fucked up as you are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Other than a plaything, you're fairly useless. >>>>>> >>>>>> It must really thrill you to imagine what dominance means. >>>>> >>>>> Oops. I guess there is someone who cares what you say! >>>>> >>>>> But, who cares what he says? >>>> >>>> Obviously, you do or you wouldn't have responded. >>> >>>Likewise, I'm sure. >> >> "I know you are but what am I" >> >> Here is your free clue for the evening: Only you were whinging about >> "who cares". > >Nice way 'not' to whine. :( Feel free to diagram any sentence you feel was whining and demonstrate your superior intellect and understanding of the English language. I'll wait for your standard backpedal/avoidance. > > >...heh Ad the Meat Plow stupidity special, the follow-ups set to email. :Followup-To: poster Wow, you must be really having a tough time, that was more pathetic than your usual fare. hehindeedy. Coming up soon, "Jes Trollin' Guv" |