From: Tegger on
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
wrote in news:pan.2009.12.14.04.09.32.154537(a)e86.GTS:

> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:39:46 -0500, tak wrote:
>

>>>
>> ***350 to ya
>>>>
>>>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=global+warming+debate
>>>> &aq=8&oq=global+warm&aqi=g10
>>>>
>>>> Just a couple to get started with, nothing wayout in these,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> DAMN!
>
> 350 parts per million is what many scientists, climate experts, and
> progressive national governments are now saying is the safe upper
> limit for CO2 in our atmosphere.



That's nonsense. And it's a concept that did not exist prior to the current
IPCC/CO2 hysteria.

CO2 has a lifespan (or "residency" in the atmosphere of about 5 to 20
years. The ocean has a near-limitless capacity for CO2 absorption, and
stores CO2 at a ratio of about 50 to 1, CO2 to water. It also gives up CO2
on occasion, that being related to solar activity.

The idea that the oceans "can't handle the load", or that CO2 stays in the
air up to 100 years, are ideas that had to be invented so the IPCC's
computer models would produce the desired outcomes. If /actual observed/
atmospheric CO2 measurements are used, the IPCC's models fall apart.

There is NO "safe" or "unsafe" atmospheric CO2 limit.

Sources:
Tom Segalstad, Nir Shaviv, Syun-Ichi Akasofu, Robert Carter, as reported in
"Looking for CO2", in Lawrence Solomon's book, "The Deniers".

--
Tegger