From: Tegger on
Even the Climate Change crowd doesn't believe that.

How do we know?

Because if the Believers were truly convinced that there actually was a
serious risk of imminent death and destruction from man-made Climate
Change, they'd be very willing to listen to all arguments, whatever the
source.

They'd readily release all their raw data, all their statistical
methodology, and all their computer modeling code.

They'd carefully consider all the evidence presented by the skeptics, and
would work eagerly with those who had differing opinions.

Since the consequence of being wrong would be fatal, they would do all this
because they would be terribly afraid they might be wrong.

The fact that they have not -- and won't -- do any of those things, can
only have one meaning: That there is no risk to the earth, or the life upon
it, from Climate Change.


--
Tegger

From: The Henchman on


"Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message
news:Xns9CDEC986B3664tegger(a)208.90.168.18...
> Even the Climate Change crowd doesn't believe that.


What does this have to do with Toyota?

From: badgolferman on
The Henchman, 12/11/2009,11:49:27 PM, wrote:

>
>
> "Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message
> news:Xns9CDEC986B3664tegger(a)208.90.168.18...
> > Even the Climate Change crowd doesn't believe that.
>
>
> What does this have to do with Toyota?

It has to do with sales of the Prius.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:02:15 -0500, Scott in Florida wrote:

> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:48:58 +0000 (UTC), Tegger <invalid(a)invalid.inv>
> wrote:
>
>>Even the Climate Change crowd doesn't believe that.
>>
>>How do we know?
>>
>>Because if the Believers were truly convinced that there actually was a
>>serious risk of imminent death and destruction from man-made Climate
>>Change, they'd be very willing to listen to all arguments, whatever the
>>source.
>>
>>They'd readily release all their raw data, all their statistical
>>methodology, and all their computer modeling code.
>>
>>They'd carefully consider all the evidence presented by the skeptics, and
>>would work eagerly with those who had differing opinions.
>>
>>Since the consequence of being wrong would be fatal, they would do all
>>this because they would be terribly afraid they might be wrong.
>>
>>The fact that they have not -- and won't -- do any of those things, can
>>only have one meaning: That there is no risk to the earth, or the life
>>upon it, from Climate Change.
>
> Plus, they are not all moving to Denver or towns higher in altitude.....

When does the exodus from FLA begin?



From: tak on

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.12.12.19.41.28.710279(a)e86.GTS...
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:02:15 -0500, Scott in Florida wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:48:58 +0000 (UTC), Tegger <invalid(a)invalid.inv>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Even the Climate Change crowd doesn't believe that.
>>>
>>>How do we know?
>>>
>>>Because if the Believers were truly convinced that there actually was a
>>>serious risk of imminent death and destruction from man-made Climate
>>>Change, they'd be very willing to listen to all arguments, whatever the
>>>source.
>>>
>>>They'd readily release all their raw data, all their statistical
>>>methodology, and all their computer modeling code.
>>>
>>>They'd carefully consider all the evidence presented by the skeptics, and
>>>would work eagerly with those who had differing opinions.
>>>
>>>Since the consequence of being wrong would be fatal, they would do all
>>>this because they would be terribly afraid they might be wrong.
>>>
>>>The fact that they have not -- and won't -- do any of those things, can
>>>only have one meaning: That there is no risk to the earth, or the life
>>>upon it, from Climate Change.
>>
>> Plus, they are not all moving to Denver or towns higher in altitude.....
>
> When does the exodus from FLA begin?
>
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091212/ap_on_sc/climate_e_mails