{BS} Wedding cake to be gluten free!
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: {BS} Barney Frank and Bill O'Rielly caught without makeup!
Next: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 1 Aug 2010 11:33 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:27:48 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Aug 1, 9:55 am, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 05:31:01 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: >> > On Jul 31, 4:17 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:17:06 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: >> >> > On Jul 31, 11:00 am, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:10:58 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: >> >> >> > On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> >> >> No wonder it's costing ~$5M >> >> >> >> > It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run >> >> >> > with the upper crust. I know if it was a republican's daughter >> >> >> > spending the same amount it would not be news. The rich are different >> >> >> > than us. >> >> >> >> ED! Read what you just said, please! >> >> >> >> If it were a Republican's daughter, we'd be hearing about it, OK, and what >> >> >> a tremendous waste of money it was. You know it. Why, that money could >> >> >> have been used to save the canker worm from Arizona tractors! >> >> >> > Oh horse hockey. Anyone who makes money by working hard (mentally, >> >> > physically, time-wise) can spend it any way they want. >> >> >> That's not what the Liberals tell us, Ed. They have real trouble with rich >> >> people.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> > We have trouble with rich people paying less in tax by percentage than >> > us in the great unwashed group. >> >> And, you don't think the Clintons are in that group? >> >> When John Kerry made his tax returns available, on the state form he had >> NOT checked, "pay tax based on the higher rate." >> >> (they actually have a selection that allows you to pay MORE tax in Mass >> than the standard 5.25% rate!)- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Why would you expect a democrat to voluntarily pay a higher tax rate > but not a republican? I dunno. I guess because they're alway sayin how everyone should pay his fair share and are pointing at Republicans as trying to 'save the rich'? They could always lead by example, but that's not going to happen anytime soon.
From: edspyhill01 on 1 Aug 2010 12:10 On Aug 1, 11:33 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:27:48 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > > On Aug 1, 9:55 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 05:31:01 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > >> > On Jul 31, 4:17 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:17:06 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > >> >> > On Jul 31, 11:00 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:10:58 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > >> >> >> > On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> >> >> >> No wonder it's costing ~$5M > > >> >> >> > It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run > >> >> >> > with the upper crust. I know if it was a republican's daughter > >> >> >> > spending the same amount it would not be news. The rich are different > >> >> >> > than us. > > >> >> >> ED! Read what you just said, please! > > >> >> >> If it were a Republican's daughter, we'd be hearing about it, OK, and what > >> >> >> a tremendous waste of money it was. You know it. Why, that money could > >> >> >> have been used to save the canker worm from Arizona tractors! > > >> >> > Oh horse hockey. Anyone who makes money by working hard (mentally, > >> >> > physically, time-wise) can spend it any way they want. > > >> >> That's not what the Liberals tell us, Ed. They have real trouble with rich > >> >> people.- Hide quoted text - > > >> >> - Show quoted text - > > >> > We have trouble with rich people paying less in tax by percentage than > >> > us in the great unwashed group. > > >> And, you don't think the Clintons are in that group? > > >> When John Kerry made his tax returns available, on the state form he had > >> NOT checked, "pay tax based on the higher rate." > > >> (they actually have a selection that allows you to pay MORE tax in Mass > >> than the standard 5.25% rate!)- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Why would you expect a democrat to voluntarily pay a higher tax rate > > but not a republican? > > I dunno. I guess because they're alway sayin how everyone should pay his > fair share and are pointing at Republicans as trying to 'save the rich'? > > They could always lead by example, but that's not going to happen anytime > soon.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - That canard is over-used and bankrupt. No. We all follow the laws the same. It would be a good thing for republicans if somebody else foots the bills - that being your main focus as greed heads and irresponsible members of our society.
From: Clive on 1 Aug 2010 20:47 In message <e5a6339a-e91e-45a2-91de-9f9d32fe8743(a)x20g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> writes >You may ask why would poor people and middles class rabidly support >tax laws that have a negative effect on their meager wealth. The >republicans and neo-cons have convinced the great unwashed to think "I >could get rich tomorrow". Yeah, right. >America is a wild west town that disarms the town folk but lets the >gunslingers walk around armed and dangerous. I think that this is what you'd get from any administration. Just look at our Parliament, they get generous tax free allowances, first class travel, house in the constituency that they can do up at tax payers expense then sell keeping all the profits and more perks besides. Us, the great unwashed have to pay to buy that car to get to work, pay a lot on fuel for that trip, pay taxes on our income, and taxes on everything we buy. When there was a debate about whether we should be able to see the expenses (which are from our taxes) they voted against it. Luckily one of our major papers forced the issue with a freedom of information request which we are allowed to do, (one of the perks of being in the EU) they then started to publish the results, which were shocking and as it was being drip fed day after day, the government of the day realised that this would go on for long enough to see them thrown out at the election so they opened the flood gates. -- Clive
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 2 Aug 2010 19:00
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:10:00 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: >> I dunno. I guess because they're alway sayin how everyone should pay his >> fair share and are pointing at Republicans as trying to 'save the rich'? >> >> They could always lead by example, but that's not going to happen anytime >> soon.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > That canard is over-used and bankrupt. Of course it is! Look how many Democrats got caught not paying taxes in just one week! |