Prev: {BS} Barney Frank and Bill O'Rielly caught without makeup!
Next: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 31 Jul 2010 11:01
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:31:05 +0100, Clive wrote:

> In message
> <bc1a68a0-9070-4bef-b87c-42d1233ac514(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> writes
>>On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku 0 >> No wonder it's costing ~$5M
>>It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run
>>with the upper crust. I know if it was a republican's daughter
>>spending the same amount it would not be news. The rich are different
>>than us.
> They bleed like us, when someone cuts them, they're just like you and
> me. It's just their mindset that is different, they see possibilities
> were most wouldn't, and they're prepared to take a chance on an educated
> guess. That's were entrepreneurs are.

And as long as they're Liberal Democrats, it's OK!



From: Tom on 31 Jul 2010 12:55


"Hachiroku ハチロク" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:mUW4o.50683$0A5.16469(a)newsfe22.iad...
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:10:58 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote:
>
>> On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>> No wonder it's costing ~$5M
>>
>> It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run
>> with the upper crust. I know if it was a republican's daughter
>> spending the same amount it would not be news. The rich are different
>> than us.
>
> ED! Read what you just said, please!
>
> If it were a Republican's daughter, we'd be hearing about it, OK, and what
> a tremendous waste of money it was. You know it. Why, that money could
> have been used to save the canker worm from Arizona tractors!
>
>amazing the Clintons entered the presidential office without anything and
>10 years later can spend millions on a wedding, our elected reps are all
>very good business men. check out rangle doesn't report a million in income
>and gets a reprimand. short the irs a 100 and you will get a bill with
>penalty and interest

From: edspyhill01 on 31 Jul 2010 15:14
On Jul 31, 9:31 am, Clive <cl...(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In message
> <bc1a68a0-9070-4bef-b87c-42d1233ac...(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> edspyhill01 <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> writes>On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku 0 >> No wonder it's costing ~$5M
> >It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run
> >with the upper crust.  I know if it was a republican's daughter
> >spending the same amount it would not be news.  The rich are different
> >than us.
>
> They bleed like us, when someone cuts them, they're just like you and
> me.   It's just their mindset that is different, they see possibilities
> were most wouldn't, and they're prepared to take a chance on an educated
> guess.   That's were entrepreneurs are.
> --
> Clive

Most have earned it and they can spend it as they feel free. It's all
relative. When I told someone how much I paid for my new home office
chair, the response was: It must be nice to be rich. I live in that
chair for 12 hours a day. And some relatives swear I have a $million
save because we are DINKs.

But I still back Estate Taxes. Go figure...
From: edspyhill01 on 31 Jul 2010 15:17
On Jul 31, 11:00 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:10:58 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote:
> > On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> >> No wonder it's costing ~$5M
>
> > It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run
> > with the upper crust. I know if it was a republican's daughter
> > spending the same amount it would not be news. The rich are different
> > than us.
>
> ED! Read what you just said, please!
>
> If it were a Republican's daughter, we'd be hearing about it, OK, and what
> a tremendous waste of money it was. You know it. Why, that money could
> have been used to save the canker worm from Arizona tractors!

Oh horse hockey. Anyone who makes money by working hard (mentally,
physically, time-wise) can spend it any way they want.
From: edspyhill01 on 31 Jul 2010 15:23
On Jul 31, 12:55 pm, "Tom" <t...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> "Hachiroku ハチロク" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>
> news:mUW4o.50683$0A5.16469(a)newsfe22.iad...
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:10:58 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote:
>
> >> On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> >>> No wonder it's costing ~$5M
>
> >> It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run
> >> with the upper crust.  I know if it was a republican's daughter
> >> spending the same amount it would not be news.  The rich are different
> >> than us.
>
> > ED! Read what you just said, please!
>
> > If it were a Republican's daughter, we'd be hearing about it, OK, and what
> > a tremendous waste of money it was. You know it. Why, that money could
> > have been used to save the canker worm from Arizona tractors!
>
> >amazing the Clintons entered the presidential office without anything and
> >10 years later can spend millions on a wedding, our  elected reps are all
> >very good business men. check out rangle doesn't report a million in income
> >and gets a reprimand. short the irs a 100 and you will get a bill with
> >penalty and interest- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

All you need to do is get an advanced legal degree, become a Rhodes
Scholar, work as a lawyer, and all the jobs the Clintons worked at,
work at making connections. Remember, the Clintons earned their money
Our last president was just born into money and influence.

You are showing your envy. I think that is one of the big sins.

Funny how the sides have switched. I'm pro-wealth and you are
begrudging the wealthy their right to spend their money. Maybe you
want Chelsea to be like you and have her wedding in the VFW hall.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: {BS} Barney Frank and Bill O'Rielly caught without makeup!
Next: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'.