Prev: {BS} Barney Frank and Bill O'Rielly caught without makeup!
Next: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 31 Jul 2010 16:17 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:17:06 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Jul 31, 11:00 am, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:10:58 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: >> > On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> No wonder it's costing ~$5M >> >> > It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run >> > with the upper crust. I know if it was a republican's daughter >> > spending the same amount it would not be news. The rich are different >> > than us. >> >> ED! Read what you just said, please! >> >> If it were a Republican's daughter, we'd be hearing about it, OK, and what >> a tremendous waste of money it was. You know it. Why, that money could >> have been used to save the canker worm from Arizona tractors! > > Oh horse hockey. Anyone who makes money by working hard (mentally, > physically, time-wise) can spend it any way they want. That's not what the Liberals tell us, Ed. They have real trouble with rich people.
From: Clive on 31 Jul 2010 16:49 In message <4c5485f4$0$74748$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se>, =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> writes >When you die, you leave an estate. Our great President, Geroge Bush*, >removed the estate taxes from ALL estates. The Liberals want to reimpose >it; they say only on estates of $3-4M or more. That's what they say. I understand now, over here they're called "Death Duties" and come in much lower than yours, I think at about 150,000UKP, BICBW. -- Clive
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 31 Jul 2010 19:41 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:49:15 +0100, Clive wrote: > In message <4c5485f4$0$74748$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se>, > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> > writes >>When you die, you leave an estate. Our great President, Geroge Bush*, >>removed the estate taxes from ALL estates. The Liberals want to reimpose >>it; they say only on estates of $3-4M or more. That's what they say. > I understand now, over here they're called "Death Duties" and come in > much lower than yours, I think at about 150,000UKP, BICBW. Damn! That's about a million American, isn't it??? ;) (I know the approximate exchange rate...) Actually, the way we keep borrowing from the Chinese, my exaggerated exchange rate might not be so exaggerated by the time Obama's through...
From: edspyhill01 on 1 Aug 2010 08:29 On Jul 31, 4:49 pm, Clive <cl...(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk> wrote: > In message <4c5485f4$0$74748$afc38...(a)read01.usenet4all.se>, > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> > writes>When you die, you leave an estate. Our great President, Geroge Bush*, > >removed the estate taxes from ALL estates. The Liberals want to reimpose > >it; they say only on estates of $3-4M or more. That's what they say. > > I understand now, over here they're called "Death Duties" and come in > much lower than yours, I think at about 150,000UKP, BICBW. > -- > Clive Yes, according to republicans, the only people who should pay taxes are poor people. AND poor people should make up for all business losses with their tax money. AND poor people have to do this while businesses are bent on off-shoring all jobs. The transference of wealth is unearned income to the person receiving the money. It's that simple. Spare us the story about a farmer or rancher.
From: edspyhill01 on 1 Aug 2010 08:31 On Jul 31, 4:17 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:17:06 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > > On Jul 31, 11:00 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:10:58 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > >> > On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> >> No wonder it's costing ~$5M > > >> > It's their money, and even if the Clintons are Democrats, they run > >> > with the upper crust. I know if it was a republican's daughter > >> > spending the same amount it would not be news. The rich are different > >> > than us. > > >> ED! Read what you just said, please! > > >> If it were a Republican's daughter, we'd be hearing about it, OK, and what > >> a tremendous waste of money it was. You know it. Why, that money could > >> have been used to save the canker worm from Arizona tractors! > > > Oh horse hockey. Anyone who makes money by working hard (mentally, > > physically, time-wise) can spend it any way they want. > > That's not what the Liberals tell us, Ed. They have real trouble with rich > people.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - We have trouble with rich people paying less in tax by percentage than us in the great unwashed group.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: {BS} Barney Frank and Bill O'Rielly caught without makeup! Next: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'. |