{BS} Sept 11 anniversary coming. What memorials are available?
in [Toyota]
|
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 9 Sep 2009 16:37 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.09.09.20.30.31.90275(a)e86.GTS... > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:15:26 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:pan.2009.09.09.20.11.46.633627(a)e86.GTS... >>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:19:01 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:nospam-E22C1E.11561109092009(a)news.giganews.com... >>>>> In article >>>>> <8196cfd1-9d4c-4799-a585-5f0628dced9b(a)g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, >>>>> Doug Kanter <dougkmusic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is >>>>>> > essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two >>>>>> days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming >>>>>> ideas with your reporters. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to see the media spend a whole day on it, beginning with all >>>>> the video including never seen before video of the planes hitting the >>>>> WTC and it's ultimate collapse. >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> All the media? That's a lot of repetitious video footage. The media >>>> doesn't even do that for Pearl Harbor Day. Why do you suppose that is? >>> >>> Because they're Liberals, and have to be Politically Correct. It is >>> Ramadan, after all, and we sure can't alienate anybody during their Holy >>> season. >> >> >> Do you agree with dbu that "the media" should run continuous footage of >> 9/11 all day long? >> >> If you agree, what purpose would it serve, other than to excite boys like >> dbu, who love watching stuff blow up? > > To lull us out of complacency. > > The Liberals are trying to forget it, and thereby doom it to happen again. You have no evidence that liberals are trying to forget it.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 9 Sep 2009 16:38 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.09.09.20.29.31.919386(a)e86.GTS... > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:16:32 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:pan.2009.09.09.20.10.32.605733(a)e86.GTS... >>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:01:21 -0700, Doug Kanter wrote: >>> >>>> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is >>>>> essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press. >>>> >>>> >>>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two >>>> days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming >>>> ideas with your reporters. >>> >>> >>> http://islam.about.com/od/calendar/f/2009ramadan.htm >>> >>> Question: When is Ramadan 2009? >>> >>> Ramadan, the greatest religious observance in Islam, is an annual month >>> of fasting. What are the dates for Ramadan in 2009? Answer: Ramadan is >>> expected to begin on or around August 22, 2009 and will finish on or >>> around September 20, 2009. >>> >>> >>> WOW! September 11 is SMACK IN THE MIDDLE!!! >>> >>> Congress will be well pleased. Of course, they won't be able to SAY too >>> much about it, because we don't want to OFFEND anyone during their high >>> Holy season, but I bet prayer rugs will be handed out in the lobby. >> >> >> That doesn't answer the question, but dbu already did. This was the >> question which your little presentation did not answer: >> >> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two >> days >> before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming ideas with >> your reporters. > > Oh. It's you. I forgot. I remember Doug Kanter from a few years ago, when > he had some semblance of sensibility. > > Now I know better. > > > What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming ideas with your reporters.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Sep 2009 16:38 On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:37:33 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.09.20.30.31.90275(a)e86.GTS... >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:15:26 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:pan.2009.09.09.20.11.46.633627(a)e86.GTS... >>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:19:01 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>> >>>>> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:nospam-E22C1E.11561109092009(a)news.giganews.com... >>>>>> In article >>>>>> <8196cfd1-9d4c-4799-a585-5f0628dced9b(a)g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, >>>>>> Doug Kanter <dougkmusic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" >>>>>>> <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is >>>>>>> > essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press >>>>>>> two days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're >>>>>>> brainstorming ideas with your reporters. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to see the media spend a whole day on it, beginning with >>>>>> all the video including never seen before video of the planes >>>>>> hitting the WTC and it's ultimate collapse. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> All the media? That's a lot of repetitious video footage. The media >>>>> doesn't even do that for Pearl Harbor Day. Why do you suppose that >>>>> is? >>>> >>>> Because they're Liberals, and have to be Politically Correct. It is >>>> Ramadan, after all, and we sure can't alienate anybody during their >>>> Holy season. >>> >>> >>> Do you agree with dbu that "the media" should run continuous footage of >>> 9/11 all day long? >>> >>> If you agree, what purpose would it serve, other than to excite boys >>> like dbu, who love watching stuff blow up? >> >> To lull us out of complacency. >> >> The Liberals are trying to forget it, and thereby doom it to happen >> again. > > > You have no evidence that liberals are trying to forget it. Forget what?
From: ByTor on 9 Sep 2009 16:40 In article <8uQpm.145116$sC1.86815(a)newsfe17.iad>, newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says... > > "ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message > news:0023a6cc$0$11589$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > > In article <sdQpm.145115$sC1.118274(a)newsfe17.iad>, > > newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says... > >> > >> "ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message > >> news:00060aaa$0$24304$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > >> > >> >> > Remind people, congress & THEMSELVES (the media) the realities of > >> >> > that > >> >> > day. Seems like Congress and most of our representatives are > >> >> > suffering > >> >> > from some type of STM loss of just how scared people were & THEY > >> >> > wanted > >> >> > action, blood first, questions later. Remind them of that feeling > >> >> > they > >> >> > had when watching the towers fall & burn & people jumping out > >> >> > windows. > >> >> > People wanted BLOOD & revenge & when something was done (whether I > >> >> > agree > >> >> > with or not) years later its a LYNCH mob of the prior > >> >> > administration. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> An article like that belongs in the editorial section, and I'm sure > >> >> you'll > >> >> see such articles. It's arbitrary and absurd for someone like golfboy > >> >> to > >> >> insist that today is the day he should be seeing such articles. He > >> >> saying > >> >> these things just to see his words on the internet(s) because nobody > >> >> at > >> >> home > >> >> listens to him. > >> > > >> > What troubles me is the insistence on the prior administrations > >> > response > >> > to all of this under scrutiny today by the current administration (ex: > >> > questioning CIA tactics). I'll tell ya what Joe, I don't care who was > >> > president, I WOULD NOT have wanted to be in that position, people > >> > NEEDED > >> > & WANTED some type of payback, period, I don't think they cared at the > >> > time. I'm watching now how scary it is that these dictator style > >> > leaders > >> > are STEPPING all over this administration right now doing what they > >> > want, its a scary thought to even think of what an "Obama" type would > >> > have done back on the day. > >> > >> > >> Got an example or three of "dictator style leaders STEPPING all over this > >> administration right now" ? > > > > I figured I wouldn't have to mention it as you appear to be informed but > > I will........Iran, North Korea, Venezuela. > > > > Now I'm not going to play the game of posting proof & links. It is "my" > > personal opinion that these leaders are stepping all over us. Do I have > > to prove my opinion? No I don't, through research of "my" own this is > > how I feel. > > > I don't need links. I was just interested in your examples. I'm frankly > surprised that you mentioned the ones you did, since Obama has managed them > in PRECISELY the same way as Bush, except for one detail which makes his way > much better. Why the need to compare Bush? He is not the issue here. This argument I will not get into as I am NOT concerned with comparing parties & the tactics of Bush vs Obama. Saying Obama's way is the "same" as Bush but is much better is kind of a confusing statement, why the need to "defend" Obama? I really don't care for these pointing fingers arguments to be honest. > Onward: Using any one of your three examples, please explain how you think > that country has stepped all over Obama, and what YOU think Obama should've > done in response. Have you been actually following the news? I'm not being sarcastic here I'm being very serious. What do I think he should do different? Do I look like a "professional" politician? All I stated was that it seems like these countries are turning their noses to us period as well as other countries, do I have to be a master tactician to know how to solve it or have an opinion? I won't go this ping pong route Joe, I have my opinions & you have yours, I don't have to convince anyone of mine.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Sep 2009 18:47
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:38:06 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.09.20.29.31.919386(a)e86.GTS... >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:16:32 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:pan.2009.09.09.20.10.32.605733(a)e86.GTS... >>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:01:21 -0700, Doug Kanter wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is >>>>>> essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two >>>>> days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming >>>>> ideas with your reporters. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://islam.about.com/od/calendar/f/2009ramadan.htm >>>> >>>> Question: When is Ramadan 2009? >>>> >>>> Ramadan, the greatest religious observance in Islam, is an annual >>>> month of fasting. What are the dates for Ramadan in 2009? Answer: >>>> Ramadan is expected to begin on or around August 22, 2009 and will >>>> finish on or around September 20, 2009. >>>> >>>> >>>> WOW! September 11 is SMACK IN THE MIDDLE!!! >>>> >>>> Congress will be well pleased. Of course, they won't be able to SAY >>>> too much about it, because we don't want to OFFEND anyone during their >>>> high Holy season, but I bet prayer rugs will be handed out in the >>>> lobby. >>> >>> >>> That doesn't answer the question, but dbu already did. This was the >>> question which your little presentation did not answer: >>> >>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two >>> days >>> before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming ideas >>> with your reporters. >> >> Oh. It's you. I forgot. I remember Doug Kanter from a few years ago, >> when he had some semblance of sensibility. >> >> Now I know better. >> >> >> >> > > > > What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two days > before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming ideas with > your reporters. I'd focus on prevention. |