From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Sep 2009 16:29 On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:16:32 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.09.20.10.32.605733(a)e86.GTS... >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:01:21 -0700, Doug Kanter wrote: >> >>> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is >>>> essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press. >>> >>> >>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two >>> days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming >>> ideas with your reporters. >> >> >> http://islam.about.com/od/calendar/f/2009ramadan.htm >> >> Question: When is Ramadan 2009? >> >> Ramadan, the greatest religious observance in Islam, is an annual month >> of fasting. What are the dates for Ramadan in 2009? Answer: Ramadan is >> expected to begin on or around August 22, 2009 and will finish on or >> around September 20, 2009. >> >> >> WOW! September 11 is SMACK IN THE MIDDLE!!! >> >> Congress will be well pleased. Of course, they won't be able to SAY too >> much about it, because we don't want to OFFEND anyone during their high >> Holy season, but I bet prayer rugs will be handed out in the lobby. > > > That doesn't answer the question, but dbu already did. This was the > question which your little presentation did not answer: > > What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two days > before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming ideas with > your reporters. Oh. It's you. I forgot. I remember Doug Kanter from a few years ago, when he had some semblance of sensibility. Now I know better.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Sep 2009 16:30 On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:15:26 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.09.20.11.46.633627(a)e86.GTS... >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:19:01 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:nospam-E22C1E.11561109092009(a)news.giganews.com... >>>> In article >>>> <8196cfd1-9d4c-4799-a585-5f0628dced9b(a)g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, >>>> Doug Kanter <dougkmusic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is >>>>> > essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two >>>>> days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming >>>>> ideas with your reporters. >>>> >>>> I'd like to see the media spend a whole day on it, beginning with all >>>> the video including never seen before video of the planes hitting the >>>> WTC and it's ultimate collapse. >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> All the media? That's a lot of repetitious video footage. The media >>> doesn't even do that for Pearl Harbor Day. Why do you suppose that is? >> >> Because they're Liberals, and have to be Politically Correct. It is >> Ramadan, after all, and we sure can't alienate anybody during their Holy >> season. > > > Do you agree with dbu that "the media" should run continuous footage of > 9/11 all day long? > > If you agree, what purpose would it serve, other than to excite boys like > dbu, who love watching stuff blow up? To lull us out of complacency. The Liberals are trying to forget it, and thereby doom it to happen again.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Sep 2009 16:31 On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:14:28 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> Because Japan is now an ally. They aren't trying to kill us anymore. > > > So? It would still illustrate the importance of vigilance. The Japanese are no longer an enemy. Why don't we show footage from the French and Indian war? > > > >> Can you say the same about Muslims? > > Some, yes. Don't ask which. It's your job to know that.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Sep 2009 16:32 On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:17:48 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.09.20.14.12.641380(a)e86.GTS... >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:51:33 -0500, dbu'' wrote: >> >>> In article <Q8Spm.145391$sC1.89825(a)newsfe17.iad>, >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: >>> >>>> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:nospam-7C5846.13050809092009(a)news.giganews.com... >>>> > In article <5sRpm.145120$sC1.143231(a)newsfe17.iad>, "JoeSpareBedroom" >>>> > <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >>>> >> news:nospam-E22C1E.11561109092009(a)news.giganews.com... >>>> >> > In article >>>> >> > <8196cfd1-9d4c-4799-a585-5f0628dced9b(a)g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, >>>> >> > Doug Kanter <dougkmusic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" >>>> >> >> <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is >>>> >> >> > essentially >>>> >> >> > a non-issue for the mainstream press. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream >>>> >> >> press two days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're >>>> >> >> brainstorming ideas with your reporters. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I'd like to see the media spend a whole day on it, beginning with >>>> >> > all the video including never seen before video of the planes >>>> >> > hitting the WTC and it's ultimate collapse. -- >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> All the media? That's a lot of repetitious video footage. The media >>>> >> doesn't >>>> >> even do that for Pearl Harbor Day. Why do you suppose that is? >>>> > >>>> > dougsy, they could do it simultaneously, that way anybody watching >>>> > tv would not miss it. >>>> > -- >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Why do you suppose the media does not do that for Pearl Harbor Day? >>> >>> Because most of those who lived the day are no longer around. Having >>> said >>> that, I would be most in favor of it being re-lived again in the media, >>> considering the vast wasteland that TV is today. There would be >>> nothing that I can think of as being more proper or fitting, plus it's >>> a great history lesson for those who think the world is one big lovely >>> place and everybody loves everybody. >> >> I guess Dougie doesn't watch the History Channel. They run Pearl Harbor >> footage all day on Dec 7th. And a lot at other times during the year, >> also. > > > History channel. Is that what you think dbu meant by "the media"? Just the > history channel? Where did I say that?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 9 Sep 2009 16:32
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:16:50 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.09.20.14.34.56077(a)e86.GTS... >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:52:54 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>>> Because most of those who lived the day are no longer around. Having >>>> said that, I would be most in favor of it being re-lived again in the >>>> media, considering the vast wasteland that TV is today. There would >>>> be nothing that I can think of as being more proper or fitting, plus >>>> it's a great history lesson for those who think the world is one big >>>> lovely place and everybody loves everybody. >>> >>> >>> How do you know that "the media" aren't going to do special things to >>> commemorate 9/11? >> >> Because it's Ramadan. > > > Nonsense. You're right. The Political Correctness that is sweeping over the Liberal Media *IS* nonesense. |