From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:16:32 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.09.09.20.10.32.605733(a)e86.GTS...
>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:01:21 -0700, Doug Kanter wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is
>>>> essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press.
>>>
>>>
>>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two
>>> days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
>>> ideas with your reporters.
>>
>>
>> http://islam.about.com/od/calendar/f/2009ramadan.htm
>>
>> Question: When is Ramadan 2009?
>>
>> Ramadan, the greatest religious observance in Islam, is an annual month
>> of fasting. What are the dates for Ramadan in 2009? Answer: Ramadan is
>> expected to begin on or around August 22, 2009 and will finish on or
>> around September 20, 2009.
>>
>>
>> WOW! September 11 is SMACK IN THE MIDDLE!!!
>>
>> Congress will be well pleased. Of course, they won't be able to SAY too
>> much about it, because we don't want to OFFEND anyone during their high
>> Holy season, but I bet prayer rugs will be handed out in the lobby.
>
>
> That doesn't answer the question, but dbu already did. This was the
> question which your little presentation did not answer:
>
> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two days
> before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming ideas with
> your reporters.

Oh. It's you. I forgot. I remember Doug Kanter from a few years ago, when
he had some semblance of sensibility.

Now I know better.



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:15:26 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.09.09.20.11.46.633627(a)e86.GTS...
>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:19:01 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:nospam-E22C1E.11561109092009(a)news.giganews.com...
>>>> In article
>>>> <8196cfd1-9d4c-4799-a585-5f0628dced9b(a)g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> Doug Kanter <dougkmusic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is
>>>>> > essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two
>>>>> days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
>>>>> ideas with your reporters.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to see the media spend a whole day on it, beginning with all
>>>> the video including never seen before video of the planes hitting the
>>>> WTC and it's ultimate collapse.
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> All the media? That's a lot of repetitious video footage. The media
>>> doesn't even do that for Pearl Harbor Day. Why do you suppose that is?
>>
>> Because they're Liberals, and have to be Politically Correct. It is
>> Ramadan, after all, and we sure can't alienate anybody during their Holy
>> season.
>
>
> Do you agree with dbu that "the media" should run continuous footage of
> 9/11 all day long?
>
> If you agree, what purpose would it serve, other than to excite boys like
> dbu, who love watching stuff blow up?

To lull us out of complacency.

The Liberals are trying to forget it, and thereby doom it to happen again.



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:14:28 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

>> Because Japan is now an ally. They aren't trying to kill us anymore.
>
>
> So? It would still illustrate the importance of vigilance.

The Japanese are no longer an enemy. Why don't we show footage from the
French and Indian war?
>
>
>
>> Can you say the same about Muslims?
>
> Some, yes. Don't ask which. It's your job to know that.

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:17:48 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.09.09.20.14.12.641380(a)e86.GTS...
>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:51:33 -0500, dbu'' wrote:
>>
>>> In article <Q8Spm.145391$sC1.89825(a)newsfe17.iad>,
>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:nospam-7C5846.13050809092009(a)news.giganews.com...
>>>> > In article <5sRpm.145120$sC1.143231(a)newsfe17.iad>, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>>>> > <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> "dbu''" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> >> news:nospam-E22C1E.11561109092009(a)news.giganews.com...
>>>> >> > In article
>>>> >> > <8196cfd1-9d4c-4799-a585-5f0628dced9b(a)g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> >> > Doug Kanter <dougkmusic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman"
>>>> >> >> <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is
>>>> >> >> > essentially
>>>> >> >> > a non-issue for the mainstream press.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream
>>>> >> >> press two days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're
>>>> >> >> brainstorming ideas with your reporters.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I'd like to see the media spend a whole day on it, beginning with
>>>> >> > all the video including never seen before video of the planes
>>>> >> > hitting the WTC and it's ultimate collapse. --
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> All the media? That's a lot of repetitious video footage. The media
>>>> >> doesn't
>>>> >> even do that for Pearl Harbor Day. Why do you suppose that is?
>>>> >
>>>> > dougsy, they could do it simultaneously, that way anybody watching
>>>> > tv would not miss it.
>>>> > --
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> Why do you suppose the media does not do that for Pearl Harbor Day?
>>>
>>> Because most of those who lived the day are no longer around. Having
>>> said
>>> that, I would be most in favor of it being re-lived again in the media,
>>> considering the vast wasteland that TV is today. There would be
>>> nothing that I can think of as being more proper or fitting, plus it's
>>> a great history lesson for those who think the world is one big lovely
>>> place and everybody loves everybody.
>>
>> I guess Dougie doesn't watch the History Channel. They run Pearl Harbor
>> footage all day on Dec 7th. And a lot at other times during the year,
>> also.
>
>
> History channel. Is that what you think dbu meant by "the media"? Just the
> history channel?

Where did I say that?



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:16:50 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.09.09.20.14.34.56077(a)e86.GTS...
>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:52:54 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>>> Because most of those who lived the day are no longer around. Having
>>>> said that, I would be most in favor of it being re-lived again in the
>>>> media, considering the vast wasteland that TV is today. There would
>>>> be nothing that I can think of as being more proper or fitting, plus
>>>> it's a great history lesson for those who think the world is one big
>>>> lovely place and everybody loves everybody.
>>>
>>>
>>> How do you know that "the media" aren't going to do special things to
>>> commemorate 9/11?
>>
>> Because it's Ramadan.
>
>
> Nonsense.

You're right. The Political Correctness that is sweeping over the Liberal
Media *IS* nonesense.