From: Jeff Strickland on

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:P%Fpm.219643$ZN.15891(a)newsfe23.iad...
> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.09.09.04.05.34.731966(a)e86.GTS...
>> Nancy Pelosi reading selected passages from the Koran.
>> Hillary Clinton offering to prepare the big feast for the end of Ramadan.
>> Most Democrat members of Congress kneeling and bowing towards Mecca at
>> sunset.
>
>
> You actually SAW "Most Democrat members of Congress kneeling and bowing
> towards Mecca at sunset." ??? Where did you see that? I may need to
> upgrade to big cable.
>

OR, you could actually wait for 9/11/09 to get here and see if this happens.






From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0gey4au4s8x2004(a)reader.albasani.net...
> Doug Kanter wrote:
>
>>On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>> I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is
>>>essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press.
>>
>>
>>What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two
>>days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
>>ideas with your reporters.
>
> You're signed in wrong, JoeSpareBedroom. Go back to your other persona.
>


It's a perfectly reasonable question, and it stands on its own merits
regardless of how it was posted.


What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two days
before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
ideas with your reporters.


From: ByTor on
In article <_QPpm.145112$sC1.94241(a)newsfe17.iad>,
newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says...
>
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0gey4au4s8x2004(a)reader.albasani.net...
> > Doug Kanter wrote:
> >
> >>On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is
> >>>essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press.
> >>
> >>
> >>What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two
> >>days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
> >>ideas with your reporters.
> >
> > You're signed in wrong, JoeSpareBedroom. Go back to your other persona.
> >
>
>
> It's a perfectly reasonable question, and it stands on its own merits
> regardless of how it was posted.
>
>
> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two days
> before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
> ideas with your reporters.

Remind people, congress & THEMSELVES (the media) the realities of that
day. Seems like Congress and most of our representatives are suffering
from some type of STM loss of just how scared people were & THEY wanted
action, blood first, questions later. Remind them of that feeling they
had when watching the towers fall & burn & people jumping out windows.
People wanted BLOOD & revenge & when something was done (whether I agree
with or not) years later its a LYNCH mob of the prior administration.
From: badgolferman on
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

>"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:xn0gey4au4s8x2004(a)reader.albasani.net...
>>Doug Kanter wrote:
>>
>>>On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman"
>>><REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is
>>>>essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press.
>>>
>>>
>>>What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press
>>>two days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're
>>>brainstorming ideas with your reporters.
>>
>>You're signed in wrong, JoeSpareBedroom. Go back to your other
>>persona.
>>
>
>
>It's a perfectly reasonable question, and it stands on its own merits
>regardless of how it was posted.
>
>
>What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two
>days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
>ideas with your reporters.

Okay, Doug.

I would have videos and images of the attacks and victims for several
days prior to the anniversary just so people would be reminded of what
happened and where the real priorities lay. The scourge of terrorism
must be brought back to the forefront of our policies and every
American must demand their government take decisive action to eliminate
those who thrive in it and foster it.


From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message
news:00239fac$0$11642$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
> In article <_QPpm.145112$sC1.94241(a)newsfe17.iad>,
> newstrash(a)frontiernet.net says...
>>
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:xn0gey4au4s8x2004(a)reader.albasani.net...
>> > Doug Kanter wrote:
>> >
>> >>On Sep 9, 10:24 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I see you still can't address the fact that September 11 is
>> >>>essentially a non-issue for the mainstream press.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two
>> >>days before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
>> >>ideas with your reporters.
>> >
>> > You're signed in wrong, JoeSpareBedroom. Go back to your other
>> > persona.
>> >
>>
>>
>> It's a perfectly reasonable question, and it stands on its own merits
>> regardless of how it was posted.
>>
>>
>> What sorts of stuff would you like to see in the mainstream press two
>> days
>> before 9/11? Pretend you're an editor and you're brainstorming
>> ideas with your reporters.
>
> Remind people, congress & THEMSELVES (the media) the realities of that
> day. Seems like Congress and most of our representatives are suffering
> from some type of STM loss of just how scared people were & THEY wanted
> action, blood first, questions later. Remind them of that feeling they
> had when watching the towers fall & burn & people jumping out windows.
> People wanted BLOOD & revenge & when something was done (whether I agree
> with or not) years later its a LYNCH mob of the prior administration.


An article like that belongs in the editorial section, and I'm sure you'll
see such articles. It's arbitrary and absurd for someone like golfboy to
insist that today is the day he should be seeing such articles. He saying
these things just to see his words on the internet(s) because nobody at home
listens to him.