From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:56:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> Really, running away after multiple spankings <SLAP>

Aratziretard doesn't even know what "cognizant" means. He had to have a
Swede give him an inaccurate definition.

From: The Greatest on

"Hachiroku ハチロク" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:hq37jd$q09$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:56:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
> > Really, running away after multiple spankings <SLAP>
>
> Aratziretard doesn't even know what "cognizant" means. He had to have a
> Swede give him an inaccurate definition.
> --
> Hachiroku

That's the result of Roz Ratzio being "mainstreamed" in high school !!
--
HJ
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:52:18 -0500, The Greatest wrote:

>
> "Hachiroku ハチロク" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:hq37jd$q09$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:56:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>
>> > Really, running away after multiple spankings <SLAP>
>>
>> Aratziretard doesn't even know what "cognizant" means. He had to have a
>> Swede give him an inaccurate definition. --
>> Hachiroku
>
> That's the result of Roz Ratzio being "mainstreamed" in high school !! --
> HJ


yeah. Passed just to get him the hell out of the classroom.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:38:22 +0000, Poik wrote:

>> Unfortunately, even if you plonk someone, you still have to suffer their
>> stupidity in the echos of posts of others.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> It is unlikely anyone would take advice on plonking from you given
> hypocrisy you have displayed today.

Hypocrasy? Welcome to Usenet!



From: Poik on
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
wrote in news:hq3gm1$4c9$3(a)news.eternal-september.org:

> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:38:22 +0000, Poik wrote:
>
>>> Unfortunately, even if you plonk someone, you still have to suffer
>>> their stupidity in the echos of posts of others.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> It is unlikely anyone would take advice on plonking from you given
>> hypocrisy you have displayed today.
>
> Hypocrasy? Welcome to Usenet!
>
>
>
>

I will again note your inability to address more than a single point
within a comment. You seem to have a very short attention span when
forced to address specific and direct questions with respect to your own
words. Specifically your condescending attitude towards Charles with
respect to his ability to choose. the implication being you do not feel
he is capable of ignoring that which he does not wish to read.

Is that your normal modus?