{BS} Even Hillary misses the point
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: The Sarah Palin Network
Next: Discount Wholesale GUCCI Jeans <free shipping paypal payment>(www.supertradeonline06.com)
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Apr 2010 16:21 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:37:19 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:hpt4pr$vjr$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:55:20 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>>> Right from the AP: >>>> >>>> Obama announced Tuesday America's new nuclear strategy, including a >>>> vow not to use nuclear weapons against countries that do not have >>>> them. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> That contradicts what you said initially, more than once. You will >>> repeat your mistake many time over the coming week. >> >> Really? How? Show me: >> >> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead? You >> don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do. Whew. Three more >> years of this stuff? >> >> > > OK. Tell yourself whatever's necessary to make yourself feel like your > life has some value. Oooh! A stunning comeback! Cut me to the quick with that one, boy!
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Apr 2010 16:25 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:hptavf$dos$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:37:19 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:hpt4pr$vjr$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:55:20 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>>> Right from the AP: >>>>> >>>>> Obama announced Tuesday America's new nuclear strategy, including a >>>>> vow not to use nuclear weapons against countries that do not have >>>>> them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> That contradicts what you said initially, more than once. You will >>>> repeat your mistake many time over the coming week. >>> >>> Really? How? Show me: >>> >>> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead? You >>> don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do. Whew. Three more >>> years of this stuff? >>> >>> >> >> OK. Tell yourself whatever's necessary to make yourself feel like your >> life has some value. > > Oooh! A stunning comeback! Cut me to the quick with that one, boy! I doubt that very much. In order for that last statement to be true, you would need to be a fully sentient being. You are not.
From: Aratzio on 11 Apr 2010 16:34 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:59:29 -0700, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> got double secret probation for writing: > >"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >news:16nwn.149010$0N3.70849(a)newsfe09.iad... >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:hpsmum$lc6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> She's been on the Sunday Morning talk shows saying, "we aren't giving up >>> on nuclear weapons, we're going ahead." >>> >> >> What do YOU think she meant by "we're going ahead"? Your interpretation >> ONLY, not the interpretation of some TV talking head. >> >> >>> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead? >>> You don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do. >> >> >> Show me one news source which reports that Obama is telling our enemies >> what he's going to do. >> > > >HE SIGNED AN F---ING TREATY, YOU NITWIT. That we would reduce our stockpiles to 1550 warheads *each*. Which drops the ability of the US and Russia to only being able to kill everyone 6 times over rather than 9 times over. Are you see that as a bad thing? Is 9 times your level of support or is there some median point that would have been acceptable? > >A treaty, by definition, is a statement of WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO DO (or, NOT >do, which at the end of the day is e3ssentially the same thing). > > So when Bush was threatening Iran was he telling his enemies anything? How about the previous SALT & START treaties? Did you have a problem with them? Specifically what parts of those treaties are you against? The current treaty replaces the one negotiated by Bush I, what faults does the current treaty address and what does it fail to address. -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees...
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Apr 2010 16:58 "Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:ihc4s5tca8aorinkucko5pi2ffu4gmjklb(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:59:29 -0700, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> got double secret probation > for writing: > >> >>"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>news:16nwn.149010$0N3.70849(a)newsfe09.iad... >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:hpsmum$lc6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> She's been on the Sunday Morning talk shows saying, "we aren't giving >>>> up >>>> on nuclear weapons, we're going ahead." >>>> >>> >>> What do YOU think she meant by "we're going ahead"? Your interpretation >>> ONLY, not the interpretation of some TV talking head. >>> >>> >>>> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead? >>>> You don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do. >>> >>> >>> Show me one news source which reports that Obama is telling our enemies >>> what he's going to do. >>> >> >> >>HE SIGNED AN F---ING TREATY, YOU NITWIT. > > That we would reduce our stockpiles to 1550 warheads *each*. Which > drops the ability of the US and Russia to only being able to kill > everyone 6 times over rather than 9 times over. > > Are you see that as a bad thing? Is 9 times your level of support or > is there some median point that would have been acceptable? > >> >>A treaty, by definition, is a statement of WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO DO (or, >>NOT >>do, which at the end of the day is e3ssentially the same thing). >> >> > So when Bush was threatening Iran was he telling his enemies anything? > > How about the previous SALT & START treaties? Did you have a problem > with them? Specifically what parts of those treaties are you against? > The current treaty replaces the one negotiated by Bush I, what faults > does the current treaty address and what does it fail to address. Since he can't find that information on television, he won't be able to answer your question. Can't you ask him something easier, like how many rakes he owns?
From: Aratzio on 11 Apr 2010 17:45
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:21:03 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:37:19 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:hpt4pr$vjr$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:55:20 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>>> Right from the AP: >>>>> >>>>> Obama announced Tuesday America's new nuclear strategy, including a >>>>> vow not to use nuclear weapons against countries that do not have >>>>> them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> That contradicts what you said initially, more than once. You will >>>> repeat your mistake many time over the coming week. >>> >>> Really? How? Show me: >>> >>> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead? You >>> don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do. Whew. Three more >>> years of this stuff? >>> >>> >> >> OK. Tell yourself whatever's necessary to make yourself feel like your >> life has some value. > >Oooh! A stunning comeback! Cut me to the quick with that one, boy! > > Hacho and the zen of "I Know You Are But What Am I" The irony is lost on Hachoo. -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... |