From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:hpt4pr$vjr$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:55:20 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>>> Right from the AP:
>>>
>>> Obama announced Tuesday America's new nuclear strategy, including a vow
>>> not to use nuclear weapons against countries that do not have them.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That contradicts what you said initially, more than once. You will repeat
>> your mistake many time over the coming week.
>
> Really? How? Show me:
>
> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead? You
> don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do. Whew. Three more years
> of this stuff?
>


OK. Tell yourself whatever's necessary to make yourself feel like your life
has some value.


From: Aratzio on
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:35:39 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:55:20 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>>> Right from the AP:
>>>
>>> Obama announced Tuesday America's new nuclear strategy, including a vow
>>> not to use nuclear weapons against countries that do not have them.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That contradicts what you said initially, more than once. You will repeat
>> your mistake many time over the coming week.
>
>Really? How? Show me:
>
>Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead? You
>don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do. Whew. Three more years
>of this stuff?

Even when it is the law that you must.

So you support the breaking of the law by the SecDef and POTUS.

Why do you hate America.

Do you even know WHY they have an NPR and what are the requirements of
the NPR?

Maybe if you got your information from more than one source you would
not keep repeating the same false information.

You never answered about your military experience. You know why you
are qualified to tell the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff they are wrong.

Now runaway from that, again.

--

Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues:

Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>

I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against
his knees...
From: Aratzio on
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:37:19 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> got double secret
probation for writing:

>"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>news:hpt4pr$vjr$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:55:20 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>>> Right from the AP:
>>>>
>>>> Obama announced Tuesday America's new nuclear strategy, including a vow
>>>> not to use nuclear weapons against countries that do not have them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> That contradicts what you said initially, more than once. You will repeat
>>> your mistake many time over the coming week.
>>
>> Really? How? Show me:
>>
>> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead? You
>> don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do. Whew. Three more years
>> of this stuff?
>>
>
>
>OK. Tell yourself whatever's necessary to make yourself feel like your life
>has some value.
>

It would be better to point out the tactics of the people he counts on
for his information are using the same tactics that the National
Socialist did prior to the elections of 1932. He won't believe you but
the parallels are frightening. Rather than the jews and "lesser races"
the right are using "progressives" and "socialists" as their
touchstones. The "big lies" the complete disassociation from reality.
The fear mongering and the ramping up of violent rhetoric. Blaming the
victims. The claims of victimhood to justify their violence.

Anyone with a grasp of 20th century history can see that.

People like him feel safe as longas you do not challenge them with
actual provable facts. They can ignore your commentary and feel safe
in their talking points.


--

Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues:

Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>

I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against
his knees...
From: Jeff Strickland on

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:16nwn.149010$0N3.70849(a)newsfe09.iad...
> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:hpsmum$lc6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> She's been on the Sunday Morning talk shows saying, "we aren't giving up
>> on nuclear weapons, we're going ahead."
>>
>
> What do YOU think she meant by "we're going ahead"? Your interpretation
> ONLY, not the interpretation of some TV talking head.
>
>
>> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead?
>> You don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do.
>
>
> Show me one news source which reports that Obama is telling our enemies
> what he's going to do.
>


HE SIGNED AN F---ING TREATY, YOU NITWIT.

A treaty, by definition, is a statement of WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO DO (or, NOT
do, which at the end of the day is e3ssentially the same thing).







From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hpt9n3$4rb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:16nwn.149010$0N3.70849(a)newsfe09.iad...
>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>> news:hpsmum$lc6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>> She's been on the Sunday Morning talk shows saying, "we aren't giving up
>>> on nuclear weapons, we're going ahead."
>>>
>>
>> What do YOU think she meant by "we're going ahead"? Your interpretation
>> ONLY, not the interpretation of some TV talking head.
>>
>>
>>> Not the point. Is everyone in the current administration brain dead?
>>> You don't tell you're enemies what you're going to do.
>>
>>
>> Show me one news source which reports that Obama is telling our enemies
>> what he's going to do.
>>
>
>
> HE SIGNED AN F---ING TREATY, YOU NITWIT.
>
> A treaty, by definition, is a statement of WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO DO (or,
> NOT do, which at the end of the day is e3ssentially the same thing).


In what ways is the treaty different from the agreements Reagan supported
with Russia?