meow
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Receiver for the car?
Next: Camry EGR Valve, Code P0401
From: Aratzio on 15 Apr 2010 00:27 On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:37:12 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:06:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:43:15 -0400, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, david hillstrom <dave(a)meow.org> got >> double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:39:33 -0400, Rebecca Ore <macogoense(a)gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>In article <0nlcs51qrf47mkotku1rdjpfrpgbiop0s3(a)4ax.com>, >>>> The 2-Belo <the2belo(a)msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote: >>>> >>>><Something> >>>> >>>>He knew better than to click on the links. >>> >>>the 2-belo sucks goats. >> >> I already used that one today. > >Seems you both have a thing about fellating goats. I suggest you form a >society. > > You have yet to provide evidence you do not suck syphilitic goats. Until you do, that will remain your cross to bear. -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Veronica Karlsson on 15 Apr 2010 03:28 =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:41:00 +0000, Veronica Karlsson wrote: > > >> >So, first you plonk him, then you respond to one of his posts... > >> > >> Now you are just being a liberal rewriting history to fit your world > >> view. > > > > No. I'm just noticing that he's either seeing invisible things or lying. > > Or maybe he just doesn't know what the word "plonk" means. > > Um, let's see. I have PAN. I can filter or unfilter at will. I think I > explained that. To plonk somebody means to ignore them, to not speak to them, to not even read what they write. It's perfectly OK to ignore somebody and still read what they write. Nobody can know what you read or don't read as long as reading is all you do, just like there's no way to know how many lurkers there are reading but not taking part in the discussion. But, to publically declare that you have plonked somebody and then, just a few minutes later, fall for the temptation to respond makes you look silly. -- __ __ _____ _____ ______ __ _ _ _____ __ ||| \ \ ) )/ / \|| | \ \ / / \ \ | \ | || | / / \| ) \ ||.. \ \/ /| |_/| | |_/ /| | | || \ | || || | / \ |.PP. \ / | | \| | | \ \| | | || |\_\| || || | / /\ \ _\/___ \_( \_\__/||_| \_\\_\__/_/ |_| |_||_| \_\__/|(_( \_\ |_______ Troll Spokeswoman _____ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ___|
From: Veronica Karlsson on 15 Apr 2010 03:36 =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:31:17 +0000, Poik wrote: > > >> > > I find your excuses and explanations to ring of desperation. I've read the > > exchanges and you did not troll anyone. The facts are quite evident that > > you do not have the ability to support the statements you make as facts as > > has been pointed out ad infinitum. Your own opinions do not match your > > rhetoric which indicates a need to fit in with a group when in fact the > > beliefs of the group are not yours. You lay blame for your failure upon > > amorphous groups that have nothing to directly do with the conversation. > > You change the subject whenever your arguments even begin to fray at the > > edges. You alter the context and reply with strawman arguments to the > > altered context. These are all tactics devised to disguise the loss of > > control in the debate (if one wishes to call what is going on debate). > > > > Simply put, you lost the arguments on facts alone and cannot accept the > > defeat and what you see as the loss of face. Your ego is driving your end > > of the argument and your ego is overmatched by contrarian trolls with > > grasp of the facts. > > > > The best example is your need to "prove" that the Nuclear Policy Review is > > some document that weakens the overall defense of the United States. No > > amount of factual evidence can possibly alter your view that the President > > of the United States has willfully and with colusion of the Cabinet, the > > DoD and the Joint Chiefs of Staff submitted a document that creates a hole > > in the greater defense of the USA. > > > > You inability to step back and reasses your own views describes just how > > emotionally invested you have become. > > I'd say the dissertation above merely indicates your inablitity to read. I'd say it indicates that hi^H^HPoik's ability to read is better than yo^H^HHachiroku's. > You haven't grasped a thing I have said. Not surprising. Seems none of you > from "flonk" can actually follow an arguement that goes against the > accepted norms (i.e., Liberalism) > > Let us know when you begin to think for yourself. Welcome to the flonk Poik! :-) -- __ __ _____ _____ ______ __ _ _ _____ __ ||| \ \ ) )/ / \|| | \ \ / / \ \ | \ | || | / / \| ) \ ||.. \ \/ /| |_/| | |_/ /| | | || \ | || || | / \ |.PP. \ / | | \| | | \ \| | | || |\_\| || || | / /\ \ _\/___ \_( \_\__/||_| \_\\_\__/_/ |_| |_||_| \_\__/|(_( \_\ |_______ Troll Spokeswoman _____ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ___|
From: david hillstrom on 15 Apr 2010 12:45 On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:06:40 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: >On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:43:15 -0400, in the land of >alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, david hillstrom <dave(a)meow.org> >got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:39:33 -0400, Rebecca Ore <macogoense(a)gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>In article <0nlcs51qrf47mkotku1rdjpfrpgbiop0s3(a)4ax.com>, >>> The 2-Belo <the2belo(a)msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote: >>> >>><Something> >>> >>>He knew better than to click on the links. >> >>the 2-belo sucks goats. > >I already used that one today. so? -- dave hillstrom zrbj mhm15x4
From: david hillstrom on 15 Apr 2010 12:50
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:15:49 -0700, Checkmate <LunaticFringe(a)The.Edge> wrote: >Felching article from server... > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:43:15 -0400, david hillstrom put forth the notion >that... > > >> >> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:39:33 -0400, Rebecca Ore <macogoense(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <0nlcs51qrf47mkotku1rdjpfrpgbiop0s3(a)4ax.com>, >> > The 2-Belo <the2belo(a)msd.bigREMOVETHISlobe.ne.jp> wrote: >> > >> ><Something> >> > >> >He knew better than to click on the links. >> >> the 2-belo sucks goats. > >...while you're busy sucking three-legged syphilitic wiener djoggies. stop projecting. -- dave hillstrom zrbj mhm15x4 |