meow
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Receiver for the car?
Next: Camry EGR Valve, Code P0401
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Apr 2010 00:10 On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:26:57 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>I know. I can't help playing with idiots. It's like teasing a dog or a >>cat with a laser pointer. Aratzio uses about the same amount of brain >>power required for that, too. >> >> >> > When was the last time you heard "Jes' Trollin' Guv." Pretty much with every post you make. Do you really think you're getting to me? Told you, I used to do the same thing many years ago. You aren't going to get me to melt down. If I do, it'll be so you can get a laugh. Do I care? I'm thicker skinned than that. It's just usenet. If this were real life, I'd probably just shove your balls down your throat and be done with it.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Apr 2010 00:13 On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:17:00 -0400, Rebecca Ore wrote: >> I hope to God that's not a self-portrait! > > Considering that it's a black guy and I'm white, not so much, but are you > sure I'm female? (hmmm...I'd better rethink this a bit...) > > >> >> > And you might look good in fishnets like this: >> > >> > http://www.meow.org/flonk/Drag-Queens-at-Freddies/DragatFreddiesFacebook_ >> > 7?full=1 >> >> >> I could do that if it floats yer boat... > > I'd rather have you securely taped up. I prefer handcuffs on the bedposts. And fishnets. Post some more pictures to dispell any fetishes with fishnets! Actually, post some to encourage them...
From: Poik on 14 Apr 2010 00:31 =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in news:hq3f8i$2og$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:26:57 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>I know. I can't help playing with idiots. It's like teasing a dog or a >>>cat with a laser pointer. Aratzio uses about the same amount of brain >>>power required for that, too. >>> >>> >>> >> When was the last time you heard "Jes' Trollin' Guv." > > Pretty much with every post you make. > Do you really think you're getting to me? > > Told you, I used to do the same thing many years ago. > You aren't going to get me to melt down. If I do, it'll be so you can get > a laugh. Do I care? I'm thicker skinned than that. > > It's just usenet. If this were real life, I'd probably just shove your > balls down your throat and be done with it. > I find your excuses and explanations to ring of desperation. I've read the exchanges and you did not troll anyone. The facts are quite evident that you do not have the ability to support the statements you make as facts as has been pointed out ad infinitum. Your own opinions do not match your rhetoric which indicates a need to fit in with a group when in fact the beliefs of the group are not yours. You lay blame for your failure upon amorphous groups that have nothing to directly do with the conversation. You change the subject whenever your arguments even begin to fray at the edges. You alter the context and reply with strawman arguments to the altered context. These are all tactics devised to disguise the loss of control in the debate (if one wishes to call what is going on debate). Simply put, you lost the arguments on facts alone and cannot accept the defeat and what you see as the loss of face. Your ego is driving your end of the argument and your ego is overmatched by contrarian trolls with grasp of the facts. The best example is your need to "prove" that the Nuclear Policy Review is some document that weakens the overall defense of the United States. No amount of factual evidence can possibly alter your view that the President of the United States has willfully and with colusion of the Cabinet, the DoD and the Joint Chiefs of Staff submitted a document that creates a hole in the greater defense of the USA. You inability to step back and reasses your own views describes just how emotionally invested you have become.
From: Aratzio on 14 Apr 2010 02:45 On 14 Apr 2010 04:31:17 GMT, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Poik <narf(a)narfpoik.pinky> got double secret probation for writing: >=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >wrote in news:hq3f8i$2og$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:26:57 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>I know. I can't help playing with idiots. It's like teasing a dog or >a >>>>cat with a laser pointer. Aratzio uses about the same amount of brain >>>>power required for that, too. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> When was the last time you heard "Jes' Trollin' Guv." >> >> Pretty much with every post you make. >> Do you really think you're getting to me? >> >> Told you, I used to do the same thing many years ago. >> You aren't going to get me to melt down. If I do, it'll be so you can >get >> a laugh. Do I care? I'm thicker skinned than that. >> >> It's just usenet. If this were real life, I'd probably just shove your >> balls down your throat and be done with it. >> > >I find your excuses and explanations to ring of desperation. I've read >the exchanges and you did not troll anyone. The facts are quite evident >that you do not have the ability to support the statements you make as >facts as has been pointed out ad infinitum. Your own opinions do not >match your rhetoric which indicates a need to fit in with a group when >in fact the beliefs of the group are not yours. You lay blame for your >failure upon amorphous groups that have nothing to directly do with the >conversation. You change the subject whenever your arguments even begin >to fray at the edges. You alter the context and reply with strawman >arguments to the altered context. These are all tactics devised to >disguise the loss of control in the debate (if one wishes to call what >is going on debate). > >Simply put, you lost the arguments on facts alone and cannot accept the >defeat and what you see as the loss of face. Your ego is driving your >end of the argument and your ego is overmatched by contrarian trolls >with grasp of the facts. > >The best example is your need to "prove" that the Nuclear Policy Review >is some document that weakens the overall defense of the United States. >No amount of factual evidence can possibly alter your view that the >President of the United States has willfully and with colusion of the >Cabinet, the DoD and the Joint Chiefs of Staff submitted a document that >creates a hole in the greater defense of the USA. > >You inability to step back and reasses your own views describes just how >emotionally invested you have become. <GURK> Nice, ah, lecture. Yeah, lecture. -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (Part 1): "I'm done with you, pal. I thought you were just a troll, but I see you're a stupid troll unable to do any thinking for yourself. Even worse than the usual slobbering Liberals. Bye now!~ Don't bother to write!" Hachiroku demonstrating his inner Drama Queen (part 2): "He's a piece of work. I finally got sick of his sophomoric rantings and plonked him." 9 minutes later in response to a post from me: "I can 'operate Google'. I told you where to look. Have at. You can't. You drink the K00L-Aid to the bottom of the cup. "
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Apr 2010 18:31
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:41:00 +0000, Veronica Karlsson wrote: >> >So, first you plonk him, then you respond to one of his posts... >> >> Now you are just being a liberal rewriting history to fit your world >> view. > > No. I'm just noticing that he's either seeing invisible things or lying. > Or maybe he just doesn't know what the word "plonk" means. Um, let's see. I have PAN. I can filter or unfilter at will. I think I explained that. |