From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:07:26 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:09:45 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:12:49 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>
>>>>You ought to have another read of Animal Farm...
>>>>
>>> yes, some of us are more equal that the rest of you. But that is more
>>> due to IQ than anything else.
>>
>>Yes. I know. But I try to treat you as an equal regardless.
>>
>>
> IKYABWAI

That's the best you have, weakling?



From: tholen on
ah writes:

3582> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3582> On HaChoo's part.

What does HaChoo's part have to do with OS/2, ah?

3583> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,alt.impeach.bush,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3583> I see.

What does your sight have to do with OS/2, ah?

3584> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,alt.impeach.bush,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3584> I don't really cotton on to what you mean.

What does your lack of cotton have to do with OS/2, ah?

3585> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3585> No lather there, really.

What does your lack of lather have to do with OS/2, ah?
From: tholen on
Aratzio writes:

320> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

320> Unsubstantiated detergent lacking lye.

What does your lack of lye have to do with OS/2, Aratzio?

321> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

321> Non sequitur.

What does your non sequitur have to do with OS/2, Aratzio?

322> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,alt.impeach.bush,comp.os.os2.advocacy

322> Oh, you are preceptionalist.

What does that have to do with OS/2, Aratzio?

323> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

323> No surprise there, really.

What does your lack of surprise have to do with OS/2, Aratzio?

324> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,alt.impeach.bush,comp.os.os2.advocacy

324> I only work with exceptionalists.

What does your exclusivity have to do with OS/2, Aratzio?
From: Aratzio on
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:44:20 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:07:26 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:09:45 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>>>On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:12:49 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>
>>>>>You ought to have another read of Animal Farm...
>>>>>
>>>> yes, some of us are more equal that the rest of you. But that is more
>>>> due to IQ than anything else.
>>>
>>>Yes. I know. But I try to treat you as an equal regardless.
>>>
>>>
>> IKYABWAI
>
>That's the best you have, weakling?
>
>
And the Alcotroll Labs Digital Irony Meter survives another round of
"Nuclear Powered Kook Irony".

Please feel free to present your case as to why you, an IKYABWAI
laming retard, would need a different phrase or term to describe his
IKYABWAI lamery. Specifically in what way does using the single most
apt descriptor for your mewling fail. Is it because you feel your
IKYABWAI are somehow different that the run of the mill kook IKYABWAI?
Maybe because you spend so much time and effort thinking up those
variations on "Nuh Uh, it's you" that you feel your lames require
special classification?



From: tholen on
ah writes:

3586> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3586> Indeed.

What does that have to do with OS/2, ah?

3587> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,alt.impeach.bush,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3587> So, how's that workin' out for you?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, ah?