From: Aratzio on
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:28:42 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:14:38 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>Where does it say in the COnstitution that the government has control of
>>>everything, Chowderhead?
>>
>> WOOOHOOO RED HERRING?
>> Who said "everything", dimwit?
>
>Progressives. They want government control over everything.

Oooo, do you have a list of people who have said that or are you just
making it up as usual?
>
>Which is fine as long as they have a like-minded fool like Obama in charge.
>What would happen if, after the progressives get their way and everything
>is controlled by the government, another ROnald Reagan type gets elected.

WOOO HOOO
New Red Herring, "It is Obama's fault"

Ronald Reagan signed into law the largest tax increase in history.

So, when you used an extra capital letter, that means you are drunk.

>
>Oh, sorry. There goes a Progressive's utopia!

Ronald Reagan would be kicked out of the Republican Party for being a
tax and spend liberal.

He increased taxes, increased spending and increased the deficit.

Wow, he is much worse than Obama, Obama cut taxes.

>
>Of course, another Reagan would never get elected under the circumstances,
>because the government in power would see that it just couldn't happen.

That and you wingnuts can't handle a pragmatist.

>
>You ought to have another read of Animal Farm...
>
yes, some of us are more equal that the rest of you. But that is more
due to IQ than anything else.


From: Aratzio on
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:13:23 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Aratzio <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:23:01 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
>writing:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:58:16 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>
>>>>> Inside joke.
>>>>> Hachoo thinks the the statement "Unproven: there is no evidece" means
>>>>> it could be true and that he needs to see evidence that it isn't true.
>>>>
>>>>When did I ever say that, Chowderhead?
>>>
>>> So, you don't rember how you got the goat fucker moniker, goat fucker?
>>
>>Let's try again. You seem to have a problem with comprehension, but that's
>>nothing new:
>>
>>When did I ever *SAY* that, Chowderhead?
>>
>>Jeeze. Ya gotta spell it out for this dummy...
>>
>
>When you got the goat fucker moniker.
>Starkist, Pelosi, "unproven: no evidence"
>
>Shirley, you remember that. Ah, Fred, Pandora all laughing at you.
>
>:Was Pelosi personally responsible for the provision exempting StarKist from minimum wage increases?
>:Unknown. There's no evidence that she was.
*snicker*
>
>Ah, that was hilarious.
>You claimed that beacuse it was "unknown" that it was possible.
*snicker*
>
>It is right in the message below.
>Message-ID: <hri531$4bm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>
*snicker*
>
>I love posting MIDs for Hachoo, he can't figure them out.
*snicker*
>
>Well, is your memory is refreshed, goat fucker?

I AM SHOCKED I TELL YOU, SHOCKED!

Hachiroku when faced with factual evidence runs away. When in the
history of USENET has Hachiroku been shown to be a liar and a coward
in the same post. It is a grave day for USENET when someone so lame
can be caught lying and running away.

Oh, wait, Hachiroku. Oh, yeah, he always lies and runs away. He just
forgot to mewl some lames, toss up some red herrings while running
away.

SOP then. Never mind the shocked part.

From: tholen on
Aratzio writes:

319> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

319> No, it was more:
319> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
319> argument.

What does that have to do with OS/2, Aratzio?
From: tholen on
ah writes:

3572> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3572> Classic inconsistency.

What does Hachiroku's inconsistency have to do with OS/2, ah?
From: Aratzio on
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:14:21 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:12:49 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>Which is fine as long as they have a like-minded fool like Obama in charge.
>>>What would happen if, after the progressives get their way and everything
>>>is controlled by the government, another ROnald Reagan type gets elected.
>>
>> WOOO HOOO
>> New Red Herring, "It is Obama's fault"
>>
>> Ronald Reagan signed into law the largest tax increase in history.
>
>Ronald Reagan had the tax base to do it with, numbskull. People in the US
>were actually /working/, remember? Even with unemployment at 8%, companies
>were actually producing goods in the US.

OH DEAR GAWD, he didn't learn from the last time. The unemployment
rate at THE EXACT time he raised taxes was 8.5%. The highest rate
since WWII (at the time).

So, what tax base would that have been, people paying taxes on UI
bennies? The middle of a recession Reagan raised taxes. The largest
tax increase in the history of the US.

Explain how there was a tax base then with such high unemployment and
no tax base now with only a 1% differential.

>
>Now, we are hardly producing anything at all, unemployment is at 15% and
>Obungler thinks he can tax his way to prosperity.

So, high unemployment and Obama cut taxes.
Seems to ne he is better than Reagan.

>
>Can you say "Hoover". And, I know you suck, but we aren't talking vacuums
>here. (Speaking of vacuous, how's your hangover today?)

Did you learn the difference between "this" and "that".

>
>Tool.
>