From: ah on
On 8/8/2010 1:56 AM, Tim Weaver wrote:
> ah wrote:
>
>> On 8/7/2010 6:09 PM, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>> ah wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/7/2010 4:59 PM, rocky wrote:
>>>>> ...since 19:30 (it is now only just about 22:00) drunk a half bottle
>>>>> of sailor jerry spiced rum and coke and i am far from drunk. but i have
>>>>> watched so far today, an awfull lot of 'burn notice' epps.
>>>>
>>>> Hope you don't mind me proposing, but I think it's time for you to
>>>> step-up to harder drugz.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest ginger.
>>>
>>> I'm looking forward to a "dreu m mth43edere is a FUDKING N KEYNSOMDNDFR"
>>> type post.
>>
>> tm weevr ets piklED EGS wif MILR HYLYF!!1!
>
> That's a good example, however it is untrue.

Slander usually requires no evidence . . . right hachoo?
--
a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:58:16 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

>>> Inside joke.
>>> Hachoo thinks the the statement "Unproven: there is no evidece" means
>>> it could be true and that he needs to see evidence that it isn't true.
>>
>>When did I ever say that, Chowderhead?
>
> So, you don't rember how you got the goat fucker moniker, goat fucker?

Let's try again. You seem to have a problem with comprehension, but that's
nothing new:

When did I ever *SAY* that, Chowderhead?

Jeeze. Ya gotta spell it out for this dummy...


From: Aratzio on
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:23:01 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:58:16 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>> Inside joke.
>>>> Hachoo thinks the the statement "Unproven: there is no evidece" means
>>>> it could be true and that he needs to see evidence that it isn't true.
>>>
>>>When did I ever say that, Chowderhead?
>>
>> So, you don't rember how you got the goat fucker moniker, goat fucker?
>
>Let's try again. You seem to have a problem with comprehension, but that's
>nothing new:
>
>When did I ever *SAY* that, Chowderhead?
>
>Jeeze. Ya gotta spell it out for this dummy...
>

When you got the goat fucker moniker.
Starkist, Pelosi, "unproven: no evidence"

Shirley, you remember that. Ah, Fred, Pandora all laughing at you.

:Was Pelosi personally responsible for the provision exempting StarKist from minimum wage increases?
:Unknown. There's no evidence that she was.

Ah, that was hilarious.
You claimed that beacuse it was "unknown" that it was possible.

It is right in the message below.
Message-ID: <hri531$4bm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>

I love posting MIDs for Hachoo, he can't figure them out.

Well, is your memory is refreshed, goat fucker?
From: tholen on
ah writes:

3570> Newsgroups:
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.aratzio,alt.autos.toyota,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3570> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, HaChoo?

What does your ironic question have to do with OS/2, ah?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:14:38 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

>>Where does it say in the COnstitution that the government has control of
>>everything, Chowderhead?
>
> WOOOHOOO RED HERRING?
> Who said "everything", dimwit?

Progressives. They want government control over everything.

Which is fine as long as they have a like-minded fool like Obama in charge.
What would happen if, after the progressives get their way and everything
is controlled by the government, another ROnald Reagan type gets elected.

Oh, sorry. There goes a Progressive's utopia!

Of course, another Reagan would never get elected under the circumstances,
because the government in power would see that it just couldn't happen.

You ought to have another read of Animal Farm...