Women in a uproar, a glimpse into national health care
in [Toyota]
|
From: Mike Hunter on 18 Nov 2009 13:42 A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" that woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not cost effective to do so. America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the land because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their thirties and forties. This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that goofy law. ..
From: badgolferman on 18 Nov 2009 13:46 Mike Hunter wrote: >A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" >that woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it >is not cost effective to do so. > >America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >"medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. > >Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of >the land because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in >their thirties and forties. > >This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims >in Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass >that goofy law. > > >. I don't like monograms on breasts either.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 18 Nov 2009 13:51 "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message news:4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net... >A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" that >woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not cost >effective to do so. > > America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the > "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. > > Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the > land because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their > thirties and forties. > > This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in > Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that goofy > law. You're uninformed, as always. For decades, there have been debates over how to interpret statistics related to the risks & benefits of mammograms. An advanced search at any valid news source will reveal this truth. But this time is different. You've been told to turn science into politics, and you have obeyed.
From: Mike Hunter on 18 Nov 2009 15:29 Ya right, the fact is the AMA and the Cancer Society disagree, an advanced search at any valid news source will reveal this truth. People like you are the ones that SHOULD be concerned, I can afford what ever medical procedure my doctor recommends for me and my wife. When it is your turn Joe$#itFor Brains, to be denied a medical procedure because one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" that statistics related to the risks & benefits of YOUR heart surgery, transplant or joint replacement show that YOU too old for those procedures, you opinion will likely "change" and you will choose science instead of socialists politics that will deny your Doctors opinion of what YOU need. LOL "Joe$#itFor Brains" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:pmXMm.29564$X01.26436(a)newsfe07.iad... > "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message > news:4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net... >>A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" that >>woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not >>cost effective to do so. >> >> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >> >> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the >> land because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >> thirties and forties. >> >> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in >> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that goofy >> law. > > > > You're uninformed, as always. For decades, there have been debates over > how to interpret statistics related to the risks & benefits of mammograms. > An advanced search at any valid news source will reveal this truth. > > But this time is different. You've been told to turn science into > politics, and you have obeyed. >
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 18 Nov 2009 12:23
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:41:21 -0600, dbu` wrote: > In article <4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, > "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: > >> A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" >> that woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is >> not cost effective to do so. >> >> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >> >> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the >> land because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >> thirties and forties. >> >> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in >> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that >> goofy law. >> >> >> . > > Young women need MORE not less mammograms. It is the young women who are > more likely to die from breast cancer, because it is more aggressive at > the younger age. What in hell is this obama administration thinking. You said "thinking". AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! |