Women in a uproar, a glimpse into national health care
in [Toyota]
|
From: Mike Hunter on 18 Nov 2009 20:54 They THINK? Based on what it is doing seems to suggest otherwise. LOL "dbu`" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message news:jrqdnfl1tICc95nWnZ2dnUVZ_rFi4p2d(a)giganews.com... > In article <4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, > "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: > >> A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" >> that >> woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not >> cost >> effective to do so. >> >> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >> >> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the >> land >> because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >> thirties >> and forties. >> >> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in >> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that goofy >> law. >> >> >> . > > Young women need MORE not less mammograms. It is the young women who > are more likely to die from breast cancer, because it is more aggressive > at the younger age. What in hell is this obama administration thinking. > -- >
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 18 Nov 2009 21:08 "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message news:4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net... >A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" that >woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not cost >effective to do so. > > America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the > "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. > > Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the > land because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their > thirties and forties. > > This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in > Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that goofy > law. Funny. A used car salesman trying to interpret science. Give it up, Uncle Jemima.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 18 Nov 2009 16:40 On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:08:01 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message > news:4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net... >>A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" >>that woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is >>not cost effective to do so. >> >> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >> >> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the >> land because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >> thirties and forties. >> >> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in >> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that >> goofy law. > > > Funny. A used car salesman trying to interpret science. Give it up, Uncle > Jemima. Almost as funny as you pretending to know everything about everything.
From: dr_jeff on 18 Nov 2009 21:40 Mike Hunter wrote: > They THINK? Based on what it is doing seems to suggest otherwise. LOL Gee, Obama administration is saying that it is sticking with the old guidelines to begin screening at 40. I agree with Obama's administration on this one, not the task force that looked at the data. The data showed that you would have to screen about 1900 women in their 40s for breast cancer to save one life while you would only have to screen about 1300 women in their 50s for breast cancer. While I understand that fewer women's live would be saved by screening the younger women, fewer years woudl be lost. In addition, for saving lives, 1 in 1900 seems like a worthwhile screening. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/health/19cancer.html Jeff > "dbu`" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message > news:jrqdnfl1tICc95nWnZ2dnUVZ_rFi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >> In article <4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, >> "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: >> >>> A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" >>> that >>> woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not >>> cost >>> effective to do so. >>> >>> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >>> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >>> >>> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the >>> land >>> because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >>> thirties >>> and forties. >>> >>> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in >>> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that goofy >>> law. >>> >>> >>> . >> Young women need MORE not less mammograms. It is the young women who >> are more likely to die from breast cancer, because it is more aggressive >> at the younger age. What in hell is this obama administration thinking. >> -- >> > >
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 18 Nov 2009 22:13
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:40:19 -0500, dr_jeff wrote: > > Mike Hunter wrote: >> They THINK? Based on what it is doing seems to suggest otherwise. LOL > > Gee, Obama administration is saying that it is sticking with the old > guidelines to begin screening at 40 Sure, after they were told about how unpopular their original statement was. |