Women in a uproar, a glimpse into national health care
in [Toyota]
|
From: FridoLay on 18 Nov 2009 23:57 Mike Hunter wrote: > A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" that > woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not cost > effective to do so. > > America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the > "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. > > Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the land > because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their thirties > and forties. > > This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in > Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that goofy > law. > Past kindergarten, they call this sort of thing science.
From: Mike Hunter on 19 Nov 2009 11:11 What part of the "health task force, appointed by Obama," did you not understand? It was only thee days after the AMA and Cancer Society objected, causing the uproar, that the Secretary come out and said, it wasn't "us" it was "them," dr_jeff. LOL "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message news:taWdnYsrRbiOLZnWnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > Mike Hunter wrote: >> They THINK? Based on what it is doing seems to suggest otherwise. LOL > > Gee, Obama administration is saying that it is sticking with the old > guidelines to begin screening at 40. I agree with Obama's administration > on this one, not the task force that looked at the data. The data showed > that you would have to screen about 1900 women in their 40s for breast > cancer to save one life while you would only have to screen about 1300 > women in their 50s for breast cancer. While I understand that fewer > women's live would be saved by screening the younger women, fewer years > woudl be lost. In addition, for saving lives, 1 in 1900 seems like a > worthwhile screening. > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/health/19cancer.html > > Jeff > >> "dbu`" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >> news:jrqdnfl1tICc95nWnZ2dnUVZ_rFi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>> In article <4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, >>> "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: >>> >>>> A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" >>>> that >>>> woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not >>>> cost >>>> effective to do so. >>>> >>>> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >>>> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >>>> >>>> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of the >>>> land >>>> because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >>>> thirties >>>> and forties. >>>> >>>> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in >>>> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that >>>> goofy >>>> law. >>>> >>>> >>>> . >>> Young women need MORE not less mammograms. It is the young women who >>> are more likely to die from breast cancer, because it is more aggressive >>> at the younger age. What in hell is this obama administration thinking. >>> -- >>> >>
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 19 Nov 2009 11:21 Sorry to burst your bubble, Uncle Jemima, but the task force you're babbling about is not appointed by the president. Be very careful with your next response. This is a trap. "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message news:4b056e4d$0$6741$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net... > What part of the "health task force, appointed by Obama," did you not > understand? > > It was only thee days after the AMA and Cancer Society objected, causing > the uproar, that the Secretary come out and said, it wasn't "us" it was > "them," dr_jeff. LOL > > > "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message > news:taWdnYsrRbiOLZnWnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >> Mike Hunter wrote: >>> They THINK? Based on what it is doing seems to suggest otherwise. LOL >> >> Gee, Obama administration is saying that it is sticking with the old >> guidelines to begin screening at 40. I agree with Obama's administration >> on this one, not the task force that looked at the data. The data showed >> that you would have to screen about 1900 women in their 40s for breast >> cancer to save one life while you would only have to screen about 1300 >> women in their 50s for breast cancer. While I understand that fewer >> women's live would be saved by screening the younger women, fewer years >> woudl be lost. In addition, for saving lives, 1 in 1900 seems like a >> worthwhile screening. >> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/health/19cancer.html >> >> Jeff >> >>> "dbu`" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:jrqdnfl1tICc95nWnZ2dnUVZ_rFi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>>> In article <4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, >>>> "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" >>>>> that >>>>> woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is not >>>>> cost >>>>> effective to do so. >>>>> >>>>> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >>>>> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >>>>> >>>>> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of >>>>> the land >>>>> because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >>>>> thirties >>>>> and forties. >>>>> >>>>> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims in >>>>> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that >>>>> goofy >>>>> law. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> . >>>> Young women need MORE not less mammograms. It is the young women who >>>> are more likely to die from breast cancer, because it is more >>>> aggressive >>>> at the younger age. What in hell is this obama administration >>>> thinking. >>>> -- >>>> >>> >
From: Mike Hunter on 19 Nov 2009 11:43 Joe$#itForBrains the NGs resident racist, I never said the task force was appointed by the president, dummy. What I did was "quote" what was in the Tribune News papers. I don't know what you want but most sensible people do not want BO and the Dims in Congress, to give people from the government the power to control our healthcare, or THAT is the type of "change" they will be making. "Joe$#itForBrains"ash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:RfeNm.43774$de6.20294(a)newsfe21.iad... > Sorry to burst your bubble, Uncle Jemima, but the task force you're > babbling about is not appointed by the president. Be very careful with > your next response. This is a trap. > > > > "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message > news:4b056e4d$0$6741$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net... >> What part of the "health task force, appointed by Obama," did you not >> understand? >> >> It was only thee days after the AMA and Cancer Society objected, causing >> the uproar, that the Secretary come out and said, it wasn't "us" it was >> "them," dr_jeff. LOL >> >> >> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >> news:taWdnYsrRbiOLZnWnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>> Mike Hunter wrote: >>>> They THINK? Based on what it is doing seems to suggest otherwise. >>>> LOL >>> >>> Gee, Obama administration is saying that it is sticking with the old >>> guidelines to begin screening at 40. I agree with Obama's administration >>> on this one, not the task force that looked at the data. The data showed >>> that you would have to screen about 1900 women in their 40s for breast >>> cancer to save one life while you would only have to screen about 1300 >>> women in their 50s for breast cancer. While I understand that fewer >>> women's live would be saved by screening the younger women, fewer years >>> woudl be lost. In addition, for saving lives, 1 in 1900 seems like a >>> worthwhile screening. >>> >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/health/19cancer.html >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>>> "dbu`" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:jrqdnfl1tICc95nWnZ2dnUVZ_rFi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>>>> In article <4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, >>>>> "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has "determined" >>>>>> that >>>>>> woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is >>>>>> not cost >>>>>> effective to do so. >>>>>> >>>>>> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that the >>>>>> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of >>>>>> the land >>>>>> because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >>>>>> thirties >>>>>> and forties. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims >>>>>> in >>>>>> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that >>>>>> goofy >>>>>> law. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> . >>>>> Young women need MORE not less mammograms. It is the young women who >>>>> are more likely to die from breast cancer, because it is more >>>>> aggressive >>>>> at the younger age. What in hell is this obama administration >>>>> thinking. >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>> >> > >
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 19 Nov 2009 11:44
Do you believe it's correct for ANYONE to connect the task force with Obama? If yes, why? "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message news:4b0575bb$0$6709$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net... > Joe$#itForBrains the NGs resident racist, I never said the task force was > appointed by the president, dummy. What I did was "quote" what was in > the Tribune News papers. > > I don't know what you want but most sensible people do not want BO and the > Dims in Congress, to give people from the government the power to control > our healthcare, or THAT is the type of "change" they will be making. > > "Joe$#itForBrains"ash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:RfeNm.43774$de6.20294(a)newsfe21.iad... >> Sorry to burst your bubble, Uncle Jemima, but the task force you're >> babbling about is not appointed by the president. Be very careful with >> your next response. This is a trap. >> >> >> >> "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message >> news:4b056e4d$0$6741$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net... >>> What part of the "health task force, appointed by Obama," did you not >>> understand? >>> >>> It was only thee days after the AMA and Cancer Society objected, causing >>> the uproar, that the Secretary come out and said, it wasn't "us" it was >>> "them," dr_jeff. LOL >>> >>> >>> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message >>> news:taWdnYsrRbiOLZnWnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>>> Mike Hunter wrote: >>>>> They THINK? Based on what it is doing seems to suggest otherwise. LOL >>>> >>>> Gee, Obama administration is saying that it is sticking with the old >>>> guidelines to begin screening at 40. I agree with Obama's >>>> administration on this one, not the task force that looked at the data. >>>> The data showed that you would have to screen about 1900 women in their >>>> 40s for breast cancer to save one life while you would only have to >>>> screen about 1300 women in their 50s for breast cancer. While I >>>> understand that fewer women's live would be saved by screening the >>>> younger women, fewer years woudl be lost. In addition, for saving >>>> lives, 1 in 1900 seems like a worthwhile screening. >>>> >>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/health/19cancer.html >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>>> "dbu`" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:jrqdnfl1tICc95nWnZ2dnUVZ_rFi4p2d(a)giganews.com... >>>>>> In article <4b044174$0$18210$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, >>>>>> "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> A report from one of BO's appointed "medical" panels has >>>>>>> "determined" that >>>>>>> woman do not need monograms before the age of fifty, because it is >>>>>>> not cost >>>>>>> effective to do so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> America women, the AMA and the Cancer Society are all saying that >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> "medical" panels proposal is BS and should be opposed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Several woman on TV said they would be dead if that were the law of >>>>>>> the land >>>>>>> because THEIR Brest cancer was discovered when they were in their >>>>>>> thirties >>>>>>> and forties. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is just one of the first steps that proves how BO and the Dims >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> Congress will control your healthcare if we ever let them pass that >>>>>>> goofy >>>>>>> law. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> . >>>>>> Young women need MORE not less mammograms. It is the young women who >>>>>> are more likely to die from breast cancer, because it is more >>>>>> aggressive >>>>>> at the younger age. What in hell is this obama administration >>>>>> thinking. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > |