Wingnuts fail again.
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: {BS} Here's a "Personal Comment" that won't get displayed!
Next: Douchebag "john" posts recall alerts, obtains attention he missed out on as child.
From: larry moe 'n curly on 28 Jul 2010 21:52 Dewey, Remum & Howe wrote: > > "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly(a)my-deja.com> wrote in > news:bc9f631e-5d82-4c8d-9b8f-b1101228708c(a)m35g2000prn.googlegroups.com: > > > > > Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote: > >> > >> The ACLU does not protect the Consitution. It only protects what > >> Liberals want protected. > > > > Then explain why the ACLU has defended free speech rights of Nazis and > > Klansmen and the Second Amendment, the latter something usually of > > more concern among conservatives than liberals (despite socialist US > > Senator Bernie Sanders' high NRA approval rating). > > The ACLU wants publicity. It's that simple. Try going to them with > something that won't hit the press and you'll see. Why would the ACLU want negative publicity?
From: larry moe 'n curly on 28 Jul 2010 22:03 Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:54:19 -0700, larry moe 'n curly wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >> > SB1070 gutted on constitutional grounds. > > Bullshit. Derailed by Vox Populus. Nothing to do with "constitutional grounds". > > > You'd have a point if most Arizonans were against SB1070, but in > > reality about 60% of the people here are in favor of it, according to > > this July 25 poll: > > > > www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/07/25/20100725immigration-poll-demographic.html > > Then they are just ignoring the voice of the people. But you said the court overturned the law because it HAD heeded the voice of the people -- "derailed by vox populus". You need to keep better track of your lies, Mr. convicted con artist.
From: pandora on 28 Jul 2010 22:19 On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:03:14 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:14:47 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> SB1070 gutted on constitutional grounds. >> >> Yippee! > > Seriously, are you an idiot? I mean, really, legally, an idiot? > > Why are you cheering this? Are you an illegal alien? No, I am not. Did you come here > legally? Yes, I di. If so, why are you cheering a decision that allows millions of > people who didn't endure what you did to remain in the US? I don't care about them. What I do care about is the rights of legal US citizens and legal residents. You don't. You want them to under a gestapo-like law. Shame on you! No Green > Card, no Immigration, nothing. They just crossed the border, which by > *Federal* law, is illegal. Yes, it is. And it definitely should be handled. However, impinging on the rights of legal US citizens and residents isn't the way to do it. My daughter-in-law, who is a 4th generation American-born citizen, looks very Hispanic. So does one of her children. She isn't planning on visiting Arizona anytime soon, believe me. > Seriously, you really must have been legally declared an idiot at some > point in time. It appears only an idiot would cheer illegal activity. You made the argument that I am supporting illegal activity. THat is in your own teeny mind. > Can you go back to Canada as soon as possible? Sorry, don't want to. I've found my vacation home and except for a few idiots like you, I rather like it here.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 28 Jul 2010 22:46 On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:43:09 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:03:14 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, > Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for > writing: > >>On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:14:47 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>> SB1070 gutted on constitutional grounds. >>> >>> Yippee! >> >>Seriously, are you an idiot? I mean, really, legally, an idiot? >> >>Why are you cheering this? Are you an illegal alien? >>Did you come here legally? If so, why are you cheering a decision that >>allows millions of people who didn't endure what you did to remain in the >>US? No Green Card, no Immigration, nothing. They just crossed the border, >>which by *Federal* law, is illegal. >> >>Seriously, you really must have been legally declared an idiot at some >>point in time. It appears only an idiot would cheer illegal activity. >> >>Can you go back to Canada as soon as possible? >> >> >> > Poor stupid wingnut, hates the Constitution because it protects the > brown citizens too. Hmmm...yup. Prtects ALL citizens. The key word here being "citizens".
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 28 Jul 2010 22:47
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:03:11 -0700, larry moe 'n curly wrote: > > > Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> >> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:54:19 -0700, larry moe 'n curly wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>> > SB1070 gutted on constitutional grounds. >> >> Bullshit. Derailed by Vox Populus. Nothing to do with "constitutional grounds". >> >> > You'd have a point if most Arizonans were against SB1070, but in >> > reality about 60% of the people here are in favor of it, according to >> > this July 25 poll: >> > >> > www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/07/25/20100725immigration-poll-demographic.html >> >> Then they are just ignoring the voice of the people. > > But you said the court overturned the law because it HAD heeded the > voice of the people -- "derailed by vox populus". You need to keep > better track of your lies, Mr. convicted con artist. It heeded the voice of the media, not the people. |