Wingers: strip climate change from US classrooms
in [Toyota]
|
From: leonard78sp on 3 Jun 2010 13:15 On May 29, 11:02 am, "CharlesGrozny" <n5...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Charles, congratulations!!! You've just proven Christopher's thesis. > > Any bozo stupid enough to deny global warming is stupid enough to > > disbelieve climate change is happening. Ø > If you reread my statement, you'll see that I don't deny climate change, > just that man has such a large role in it. The climate has been much warmer > and much colder than now in the past, long before SUV's were invented or man > did much to affect climate. > > You are the missing link. You're too god-damned LIEberal and stupid to > read the whole statement, or bring any new evidence to it. > > I asked two questions, neither of which any LIEberal will answer. > > 1. If man consuming fossil fuels produces global warming, how come we > didn't have a burst of global warming after WW2? We used tons of extra > coal, gasoline and diesel fuel 1939-1945. There were also killer fogs in > Socialism has failed every time it has been tried. You are now contributing > to the failure of America. That makes you a Traitor, right along with the > Traitor-in-Chief, Apologizer-in-Chief, Socialist in Chief, etc. > > Charles Grozny
From: Mike Hunter on 3 Jun 2010 16:02 There was more oil washing ashore every day all around the world as well, from thousands of ships being sink. Oil still comes to the surface of Pearl Harbor today ;) <leonard78sp(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ed9a429c-435f-4086-a64c-de748286c93f(a)s41g2000vba.googlegroups.com... On May 29, 11:02 am, "CharlesGrozny" <n5...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Charles, congratulations!!! You've just proven Christopher's thesis. > > Any bozo stupid enough to deny global warming is stupid enough to > > disbelieve climate change is happening. � > If you reread my statement, you'll see that I don't deny climate change, > just that man has such a large role in it. The climate has been much > warmer > and much colder than now in the past, long before SUV's were invented or > man > did much to affect climate. > > You are the missing link. You're too god-damned LIEberal and stupid to > read the whole statement, or bring any new evidence to it. > > I asked two questions, neither of which any LIEberal will answer. > > 1. If man consuming fossil fuels produces global warming, how come we > didn't have a burst of global warming after WW2? We used tons of extra > coal, gasoline and diesel fuel 1939-1945. There were also killer fogs in > Socialism has failed every time it has been tried. You are now > contributing > to the failure of America. That makes you a Traitor, right along with the > Traitor-in-Chief, Apologizer-in-Chief, Socialist in Chief, etc. > > Charles Grozny
From: dr_jeff on 3 Jun 2010 22:27 Mike Hunter wrote: > There was more oil washing ashore every day all around the world as well, > from thousands of ships being sink. Oil still comes to the surface of > Pearl Harbor today ;) Really? Almost 22 million gallons of oil leaked into the gulf. Do you think that there much oil coming assure from "thousands of ship being sink"? I know they put artificial reefs off the coast of Jersey, but I haven't heard of any oil spills from that. The environmental damage is immense. And getting worse. You are sorry if you wish to make light of an environmental disaster that is damaging hundreds of miles of coast and the wildlife on the coast, not to mention having a negative impact on millions of Americans. From your beloved Tribune: <http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-oil-spill-wildlife-20100604,0,975013.story> (LA Times is a Tribune Newspaper.) Jeff > <leonard78sp(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:ed9a429c-435f-4086-a64c-de748286c93f(a)s41g2000vba.googlegroups.com... > On May 29, 11:02 am, "CharlesGrozny" <n5...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> Charles, congratulations!!! You've just proven Christopher's thesis. >>> Any bozo stupid enough to deny global warming is stupid enough to >>> disbelieve climate change is happening. > > � > >> If you reread my statement, you'll see that I don't deny climate change, >> just that man has such a large role in it. The climate has been much >> warmer >> and much colder than now in the past, long before SUV's were invented or >> man >> did much to affect climate. >> >> You are the missing link. You're too god-damned LIEberal and stupid to >> read the whole statement, or bring any new evidence to it. >> >> I asked two questions, neither of which any LIEberal will answer. >> >> 1. If man consuming fossil fuels produces global warming, how come we >> didn't have a burst of global warming after WW2? We used tons of extra >> coal, gasoline and diesel fuel 1939-1945. There were also killer fogs in > >> Socialism has failed every time it has been tried. You are now >> contributing >> to the failure of America. That makes you a Traitor, right along with the >> Traitor-in-Chief, Apologizer-in-Chief, Socialist in Chief, etc. >> >> Charles Grozny > >
From: Clive on 4 Jun 2010 11:04 In message <vKKdnaqExcgS-ZXRnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, dr_jeff <utz(a)msu.edu> writes >Really? Almost 22 million gallons of oil leaked into the gulf. Do you >think that there much oil coming assure from "thousands of ship being >sink"? I know they put artificial reefs off the coast of Jersey, but I >haven't heard of any oil spills from that. > >The environmental damage is immense. And getting worse. > >You are sorry if you wish to make light of an environmental disaster >that is damaging hundreds of miles of coast and the wildlife on the >coast, not to mention having a negative impact on millions of Americans. According to our news the total leak is used every three hours in the U.S. -- Clive
From: Dawlish on 4 Jun 2010 11:51
On May 29, 7:09 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > On Sat, 29 May 2010 05:36:49 -0400, Cliff wrote: > >http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/may/28/rightwing-grou... > > "Rightwing group seeks to strip climate change from US classrooms" > > "Climate change is a 'liberal' cause, argues Colorado-based petitioner, > > and > > requires a 'balancing' counterpoint" > > Sounds good to me. > > If you or Al Gore actually knew anything, you'd know that this bout of > "Global Warming" is cyclic and happens every 150,000 years. Followed by an > extreme Ice Age (not to be confused with a minor "Glaciation period". > > "Global Warming" is a term used mostly by scientists with agendas, > politicians, and people who don't know any better. > > If you take the time to Google "Vostok Ice Core data" and can actually > read a chart you wouldn't post the propaganda you saw fit to attach to > this message. > > But, I have a feeling you swallow everything Liberals tell you hook, line > and sinker anyway. 9. |