Warmists sought Big Oil cash
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Dec 2009 12:21 On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:15:45 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > Interesting, but who told you to say "warmists"? That sort of sloganism is > beyond your capabilities. Ooops, Teg, JSB has your number. You disagree with what is politiclly acceptable, so you can't think for yourself...
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Dec 2009 12:24 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.12.11.17.21.59.618103(a)e86.GTS... > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:15:45 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> Interesting, but who told you to say "warmists"? That sort of sloganism >> is >> beyond your capabilities. > > Ooops, Teg, JSB has your number. You disagree with what is > politiclly acceptable, so you can't think for yourself... My only interest is in the origin of the word "warmist". The matter has been settled.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Dec 2009 12:50 On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:24:10 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.12.11.17.21.59.618103(a)e86.GTS... >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:15:45 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> Interesting, but who told you to say "warmists"? That sort of sloganism >>> is >>> beyond your capabilities. >> >> Ooops, Teg, JSB has your number. You disagree with what is politiclly >> acceptable, so you can't think for yourself... > > > My only interest is in the origin of the word "warmist". The matter has > been settled. He's Canadian. It's different up there.
From: Jeff Strickland on 11 Dec 2009 12:50 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.12.11.17.21.59.618103(a)e86.GTS... > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:15:45 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> Interesting, but who told you to say "warmists"? That sort of sloganism >> is >> beyond your capabilities. > > Ooops, Teg, JSB has your number. You disagree with what is > politiclly acceptable, so you can't think for yourself... > > > And the least significant point of the conversation has been brought to the front of the line -- Teg learned a new word. JoeShitForBrains can't talk about the issues, so he makes an issue of the vocabulary and asserts that those that learn a new word can't think for themselves. He can't think or learn so he attacks the new word, while those that can think and learn and demonstrate the new knowledge.
From: Tegger on 11 Dec 2009 12:53
"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in news:SevUm.61188$Wd1.57884(a)newsfe15.iad: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.12.11.17.21.59.618103(a)e86.GTS... >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:15:45 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> Interesting, but who told you to say "warmists"? That sort of >>> sloganism is >>> beyond your capabilities. >> >> Ooops, Teg, JSB has your number. You disagree with what is >> politiclly acceptable, so you can't think for yourself... > > > My only interest is in the origin of the word "warmist". The matter > has been settled. > > You don't care that those who screamed the loudest about the skeptics being in the pockets of "Big Oil" had themselves voluntarily climbed into Big Oil's pockets? -- Tegger |