Prev: Toyota gambles with Fire Sale Prices over piling inventory!!! (Cross posts removed)
Next: Supra for sale on eBay...
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 2 Aug 2010 19:39
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:20:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:25:57 -0700, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> got double secret probation
> for writing:
>
>>
>>"Mike" <mikehunt2(a)lycos.com> wrote in message
>>news:T-Sdnc-JpsvbnsvRnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d(a)ptd.net...
>>> What really happened is, BO(ZO) and the Dims have allowed criminal
>>> elements to enter the county illegally causing the crime rate to go up.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Meat Plow" <mhywatt(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2010.08.01.22.41.31(a)hahahahahahahah.nutz...
>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:20:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yet, law and order Sheriff Joe Arpiao has allowed Violent Crime in his
>>>>> jurisdiction to rise 58%.
>>>>
>>>> Did you spend some time in Tent City in a pink jumpsuit perhaps?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Sheriff Joe needs to issue pink skivvies that are tow or three sizes too
>>small. Convicts will be 1.) embarrassed, and 2.) very uncomfortable. They'll
>>remember the experience of breaking big rocks into little rocks in tight
>>skivvies, and do what it takes to stay out of Joe's jails.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Really, what a brilliant idea, I am sure criminals worldwide would be
> afraid of underwear that is pink and too small. That would be such a
> great deterrent that we could export it to places like Bagram to make
> sure we destroy all of the insurgents and terrorists will to fight.
> They would cower in fear of the power of the pink undies.
>
> Seriously, are all of you toyotatards that stupid?

No, only idiots that crosspost into the group are.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 2 Aug 2010 20:51
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:07:32 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> The best any of you can do
> is Ad Hominem attacks in hopes that the attack upon the messenger will
> in some way alter the fact that your position and beliefs are not
> backed up by any of the empirical evidence

Again, where did I ever say illegals caused crime?

So, all your statistics were for nothing. But you forge ahead anyway.



From: Aratzio on 3 Aug 2010 19:55
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:39:43 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:20:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:25:57 -0700, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> got double secret probation
>> for writing:
>>
>>>
>>>"Mike" <mikehunt2(a)lycos.com> wrote in message
>>>news:T-Sdnc-JpsvbnsvRnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d(a)ptd.net...
>>>> What really happened is, BO(ZO) and the Dims have allowed criminal
>>>> elements to enter the county illegally causing the crime rate to go up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Meat Plow" <mhywatt(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2010.08.01.22.41.31(a)hahahahahahahah.nutz...
>>>>> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:20:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet, law and order Sheriff Joe Arpiao has allowed Violent Crime in his
>>>>>> jurisdiction to rise 58%.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you spend some time in Tent City in a pink jumpsuit perhaps?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Sheriff Joe needs to issue pink skivvies that are tow or three sizes too
>>>small. Convicts will be 1.) embarrassed, and 2.) very uncomfortable. They'll
>>>remember the experience of breaking big rocks into little rocks in tight
>>>skivvies, and do what it takes to stay out of Joe's jails.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Really, what a brilliant idea, I am sure criminals worldwide would be
>> afraid of underwear that is pink and too small. That would be such a
>> great deterrent that we could export it to places like Bagram to make
>> sure we destroy all of the insurgents and terrorists will to fight.
>> They would cower in fear of the power of the pink undies.
>>
>> Seriously, are all of you toyotatards that stupid?
>
>No, only idiots that crosspost into the group are.
>

BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAAA
The Toyotatard that was just bragging about his *trolling of trolls*
in another thread is now whining about the trolls.

Vee vhill be minink zees vhein of zee Irony Ore fur the years! Eet iz
zee deepesht und zee reechesht vhein vee haf eber fund!
From: Aratzio on 3 Aug 2010 20:10
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:51:42 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:07:32 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> The best any of you can do
>> is Ad Hominem attacks in hopes that the attack upon the messenger will
>> in some way alter the fact that your position and beliefs are not
>> backed up by any of the empirical evidence
>
>Again, where did I ever say illegals caused crime?
>
>So, all your statistics were for nothing. But you forge ahead anyway.
>

Leave it to Hachiroku of the *malleable* beliefs. Always deny you hold
any position that has been shown to be entirely untenable. The fact
you tried to refute the data with unreferenced and out of date data
would be the first and most obvious point.

It is quite hilarious to watch you run away from your own beliefs when
you are challenged by facts. How you willfully will believe anything
the wingnut lie machine tells you, regurgitate those lies and then
when you are challenged claim "I didn't say that" or "you don't
understand" or "I was just too subtle".

You never actually stand up for anything, all of your positions are
completely fluid, nothiing you actually believe in. Just mouth
breating bumper sticker slogans and whining that "it was
Obama/Pelosi/Reid fault. Just as I am sure everything used to be all
Clinton fault. Never once recognizing how many times the lies you want
to believe fail you at every turn.



From: Clive on 3 Aug 2010 22:05
In message <4ggh56hgn153l1snoe1ds4jvgr3fobd9f4(a)4ax.com>, Aratzio
<a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> writes
>> It doesn't have any meaning if it's doesn't
>>have a yardstick against which to measure it.
>The yardstick in the State Of Arizona is the hundreds of State of
>Arizona Law Enforcement jurisdictions that reported the violent crime
>statistics. Since the National numbers have nothing to do with the
>State of Arizona allocation of resources do explain what yardstick the
>State of Arizona should be using to allocate State of Arizona
>resources in battling Violent Crime in the State of Arizona>?
You obviously feel strongly, though about exactly what is unclear.
However, I'm an outsider, and have nothing to do with your country so
I'll just leave it alone.
--
Clive

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Toyota gambles with Fire Sale Prices over piling inventory!!! (Cross posts removed)
Next: Supra for sale on eBay...