From: Vic Smith on
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:23:02 -0500, clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote:


>
>Hey, I agree with you 100% - but the reality for me has been I don't
>GET the same reliability. Nor has anyone in my family, or many of my
>friends. If you buy NEW vehicles and keep them 5 years, GM is mabee
>as good as Ford or Chrysler. In some ways mabee even better. But
>buying 5 year old vehicles I've not found that to be true. The cost of
>operation for the second and third five year period is higher.
>Significantly. And Cadilac? Don't even get me started.
>

You have to talk specific cars. Saying GM, Chrysler, Ford don't do it.
Lots of variation. You couldn't give me a Cadillac.
My son takes care of his gal's 1990-something Caddy - think it's a
Deville. He's done some work on it, and his main complaint is the
parts cost. But he loves wrenching.
I stick with Chevys, though I also have a '93 Grand Am in my garage.
Going to dump the '90 Corsica. Still runs good and looks decent, but
I dropped the insurance this month. Just too old, and the headliner
if coming down.
The Grand Am is a much nicer ride. 3500 engine. And I paid $3500 for
it about 7 years ago. Had about 80k miles on it, now at 140k miles.
Bought it for a daughter who was commuting Chicago/Champagne
every weekend while in college. Never did anything but brakes on it,
but it threw a quad 4 driver code on her a couple times, and stalled.
And the A/C gave up.
Then she suddenly graduated, got a job teaching and left the car at my
house saying it wouldn't move off right away when you pressed the gas.
Didn't want it. She already had a Corolla then.
When it warmed up my son saw a puddle of trans fluid under it.
Leaky trans pan gasket, which he replaced. That's why it was giving
her problems - trans fluid was almost off the stick.
A steth pinned down an engine noise to the water pump, and we replaced
that. Unlike the 3.1's had to jack the engine and take off a motor
mount to get at the pump. So it was a 2 hour job versus a 15 minute
job. It sounds real sweet now, but I haven't driven it enough to know
what's in store. Though it hasn't happened to me yet, the quad 4
driver issue isn't resolved.
Free car now anyway.
But I don't know what you mean about GM's "The cost of
operation for the second and third five year period is higher."
Means nothing without talking about a specific car and the specific
repair.
At $2500-3500 for the car, it's already 5-10 years old anyway.
I usually expect to get only another 5-10 years before rust gets it.
Rinse and repeat.

--Vic