From: Vic Smith on
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:59:49 -0700, Ashton Crusher <demi(a)moore.net>
wrote:


>
>My memory is fuzzy, it's been a while since the Audi 5000 UA issue,
>but as I recall it was the first generation of Audi with an idle air
>bypass valve, or some such, and as such it allowed the computer to
>control, to a limited extend, the "throttle". The Audi's mainly did
>their UA at low speeds/stops which always made me think it was tied
>into the idle bypass. Other then sticking pedals on mechanical
>linkage, and usually after someone has monkeyed with it, I've never
>heard of UA on a true manually controlled throttle, other then simply
>stepping on the wrong pedal which no doubt does sometimes happen.

As I recall they pinned it on the pedal config and changed that.
I didn't follow it closely, though I think the mess was initiated here
in Chicago when a woman came roaring out of a parking garage and ran
over some people.
Never cared about getting an Audi anyway.
And I probably will never own a Toyota, but this is much bigger news
so it's hard to not know something about it.
Beside that, it's got me looking into what they're doing with this
drive by wire stuff, which isn't Toyota specific.
And I notice the EPS problems aren't limited to Toyota, and there are
a lot of Cobalt complaints. My wife wanted a Cobalt as her next car,
and now maybe I can talk her into something else without electronic
control into throttle and steering.
If such a beast will even exist when I'm ready.

--Vic
From: Ashton Crusher on
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:34:01 -0600, Vic Smith
<thismailautodeleted(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:59:49 -0700, Ashton Crusher <demi(a)moore.net>
>wrote:
>
>
>>
>>My memory is fuzzy, it's been a while since the Audi 5000 UA issue,
>>but as I recall it was the first generation of Audi with an idle air
>>bypass valve, or some such, and as such it allowed the computer to
>>control, to a limited extend, the "throttle". The Audi's mainly did
>>their UA at low speeds/stops which always made me think it was tied
>>into the idle bypass. Other then sticking pedals on mechanical
>>linkage, and usually after someone has monkeyed with it, I've never
>>heard of UA on a true manually controlled throttle, other then simply
>>stepping on the wrong pedal which no doubt does sometimes happen.
>
>As I recall they pinned it on the pedal config and changed that.
>I didn't follow it closely, though I think the mess was initiated here
>in Chicago when a woman came roaring out of a parking garage and ran
>over some people.
>Never cared about getting an Audi anyway.
>And I probably will never own a Toyota, but this is much bigger news
>so it's hard to not know something about it.
>Beside that, it's got me looking into what they're doing with this
>drive by wire stuff, which isn't Toyota specific.
>And I notice the EPS problems aren't limited to Toyota, and there are
>a lot of Cobalt complaints. My wife wanted a Cobalt as her next car,
>and now maybe I can talk her into something else without electronic
>control into throttle and steering.
>If such a beast will even exist when I'm ready.
>
>--Vic


ultimately I think we will all be in electric cars, even performance
cars. So most likely everything will be electrically driven.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:59:49 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:

> Other then sticking pedals on mechanical linkage, and usually after
> someone has monkeyed with it, I've never heard of UA on a true manually
> controlled throttle,

Oh, WeLLLLLLL, I do declare, /I/ have!

If I remember correctly, I believe it can, and has been attributed to
rusted throttle cables.
And, would you believe, it happens a bit here in the Northeast.

And your logic is fuzzy as well.



From: Clive on
In message <b5hjo59g9hs69ckb05titb7f4ivrjnac5v(a)4ax.com>, Vic Smith
<thismailautodeleted(a)comcast.net> writes
> My wife wanted a Cobalt as her next car,
>and now maybe I can talk her into something else without electronic
>control into throttle and steering.
I wouldn't have thought that any new car with cable control would pass
emissions regulations.
--
Clive

From: hls on
Some tests have been run which indicate that even expensive aircraft may
respond to
radio frequency emissions such as cell phones.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/BusinessTravel/story?id=1680690&page=1

A less sophisticated test showed that there were indeed instances of
interference,
but they were very difficult to duplicate. Intermittent situations like
this are
very hard to locate and cure.

It would not be impossible to consider that cell phones, radar emissions,
2-way
police radio, lightning strikes, and other forms of RFI could, under some
complex
set of conditions, cause problems in cars.

The AUDI situation, it seems, has not been totally solved yet. It was
linked
to six deaths.

http://answers.edmunds.com/question-Audi-runaway-acceleration-problem-88151.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audi

And last, the Ford Firestone rollovers were linked to several hundred
deaths. One
has to be careful with statistics, and sources of the same. I am sure you
can all find
information that conflicts with, and supports, just about anything anyone
can say.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/rollover/etc/before.html