From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Nov 2009 23:48 On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:34:22 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message > news:015ceec0$0$3210$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... In article > <pan.2009.12.01.01.09.54.308528(a)e86.GTS>, Trueno(a)e86.GTS says... >> >> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:30:10 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote: >> >> > On Nov 30, 11:19 am, Intrepid <Intrepid...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> < >> >> Monday, November 30th, 2009 >> >> < >> >> Dear President Obama, >> >> < >> >> Do you really want to be the new "war president"? If you go to West >> >> Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are >> >> increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you >> >> are the new war president. Pure and simple. < >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for this. >> >> >> You're happy Obama is going to be the new "war President"? >> >> Glad to see you're finally coming out of The Trance. > > I'm sure the president will be quaking in his shoes after he reads this > letter, if he even reads it. > > I have seen Moore's movies & I do sort of respect him in a certain way for > bringing *out* issues but a side of me views him as yet another > oppurtunist making money. > > =============== > > If he came out & said "My movies are available at no cost from now > on and giving one-third of the money I have made to charities,.", would > you still think he was an opportunist? Not under those circumstances. There is a law that you can actually pay MORE in taxes than you need to by IRS rules. Think Moore does? He's a bigger windbag than Limbaugh.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Nov 2009 23:49 On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:51:24 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > You know I'm a > Dingbat who likes to tweeze things apart in ways that make > you crazy. Corrected.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Nov 2009 23:49 On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:59:51 -0500, ByTor wrote: >> Well, in a sense, the money issue becomes irrelevant as soon as our >> public libraries purchase new movies & books which we can borrow for >> free. So, I was just curious about the money versus the message. You >> know I'm a curious sort of person who likes to tweeze things apart in >> ways that make you crazy. > > Doesn't make me crazy Joe as long as you don't include me in your 1000 & 1 > questions game, LOL! Nailed that one, and you're the newest member here!
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 1 Dec 2009 01:18 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.12.01.04.48.02.400198(a)e86.GTS... > On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:34:22 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message >> news:015ceec0$0$3210$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... In article >> <pan.2009.12.01.01.09.54.308528(a)e86.GTS>, Trueno(a)e86.GTS says... >>> >>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:30:10 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote: >>> >>> > On Nov 30, 11:19 am, Intrepid <Intrepid...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> < >>> >> Monday, November 30th, 2009 >>> >> < >>> >> Dear President Obama, >>> >> < >>> >> Do you really want to be the new "war president"? If you go to West >>> >> Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are >>> >> increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you >>> >> are the new war president. Pure and simple. < >>> >> >>> >> >>> > Thanks for this. >>> >>> >>> You're happy Obama is going to be the new "war President"? >>> >>> Glad to see you're finally coming out of The Trance. >> >> I'm sure the president will be quaking in his shoes after he reads this >> letter, if he even reads it. >> >> I have seen Moore's movies & I do sort of respect him in a certain way >> for >> bringing *out* issues but a side of me views him as yet another >> oppurtunist making money. >> >> =============== >> >> If he came out & said "My movies are available at no cost from now >> on and giving one-third of the money I have made to charities,.", would >> you still think he was an opportunist? > > Not under those circumstances. > > There is a law that you can actually pay MORE in taxes than you need to by > IRS rules. Think Moore does? > > He's a bigger windbag than Limbaugh. Since those weren't the circumstances I asked about, your response is vapor.
From: ByTor on 1 Dec 2009 07:56 In article <4b1496ad$0$7274$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net>, Mikehunt2 @lycos says... > > You mean like the "issue" in his first movie? That idiot wanted GM to > keep open an assemble plant, that was making thousands more Buicks than they > could sell, because GM "owed it to the Union Workers? > > The same fat slob millionaire who complained about the horrors of > capitalism, but made his movies in Canada because he did not want to pay the > wages charged by UNIONS in the US? Get real. LOL I didn't say I agree, I said I *sort* of respect him for bringing out issues.......I larger portion of my skepticism leans toward that he is just another oppurtunist.......;0) > "ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message > news:015ceec0$0$3210$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > In article <pan.2009.12.01.01.09.54.308528(a)e86.GTS>, Trueno(a)e86.GTS > says... > > > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:30:10 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote: > > > > > On Nov 30, 11:19 am, Intrepid <Intrepid...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> < > > >> Monday, November 30th, 2009 > > >> < > > >> Dear President Obama, > > >> < > > >> Do you really want to be the new "war president"? If you go to West > > >> Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are > > >> increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you > > >> are the new war president. Pure and simple. < > > >> > > >> > > > Thanks for this. > > > > > > You're happy Obama is going to be the new "war President"? > > > > Glad to see you're finally coming out of The Trance. > > I'm sure the president will be quaking in his shoes after he reads this > letter, if he even reads it. > > I have seen Moore's movies & I do sort of respect him in a certain way > for bringing *out* issues but a side of me views him as yet another > oppurtunist making money. But this letter, reminds me of just another > ranting done in a newsgroup or some blog somewhere. It's the most > unintelligent thing I have ever read considering the issues he's > opposing. I agree that they are *VERY* inportant issues but writing them > in a letter oozing of seemingly immature rantings, I don't buy it.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Are you really happy with your penis size?! Next: {BS} What the hell is Clinton talking about? |