From: John Galt on
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "John Galt" <kady101(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%02pn.434232$FK3.161667(a)en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com...
>
>> Yes, yes, yes. Nothing causes the liberal to whine more dependably
>> than citizens exercising personal freedom when it threatens their
>> grandiose schemes for running America into the dirt.
>
> So, you think your brother in law (who quit his job in protest over
> national politics) is a "whiney liberal", eh?

How many incorrect assumptions can you squeeze into one sentence?

My BIL can't quit his job. He owns his practice. If the government
pisses him off and he decides to move into real estate full time, twenty
people are out of work.

This is what you moonbats call "progress", I believe.

> No, of course not.
> Like always - you were just throwing ANOTHER anti-America tantrum and
> saying whatever popped into your mind.

There is nothing anti-American about self-reliance; it's one of the
characteristics that made us a great nation, and if we lose it, we will
become sheeple like you.

If you prefer a collectivist society where your inability to deal with
the pressures of life are mitigated by communal pools of assets, feel
free to join a commune. We who are capable of independent life will not
criticize you for exercising your freedom, even though you criticize us
for doing the same.

Run back to momma, now. The government is going to make the insurance
companies keep you on your parent's plan until you're 26, so you can
loaf around and play video games and have your mother wash your socks
and you can postpone being an adult for five full years after college.

Nice.

JG

From: John Galt on
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "John Galt" <kady101(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%tnpn.87158$Jq1.68265(a)en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com...
>
>> My BIL can't quit his job. He owns his practice. If the government
>> pisses him off and he decides to move into real estate full time,
>> twenty people are out of work.
>
> I like the way you say he can't quit, and then turn right around and say
> how his quitting could be done.
> It's like - in a fit of anti-government rhetoric, you've deteriorated
> into just arguing with yourself.

The real funny part is that I'm talking to somebody who can't respond to
a single rational point, but is obsessed with semantics.

Sucks to be you, loser.

JG