From: Cliff on 22 May 2010 00:29 On Tue, 18 May 2010 20:31:00 +0000 (UTC), falk(a)green.rahul.net (Edward A. Falk) wrote: >In article <agt4v5596fmq1pvm0ge7o4h8pcjhl80kg5(a)4ax.com>, >Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote: > >> Obama's problem seems to be that he has not cleaned >>house well enough (yet). > >Frankly, that's a pretty serious issue. I voted for change, not >more of the same. > >Sadly, while it's nice to imagine Obama striding in on his first day >and firing all the Bush appointees as the first order of business, >I suspect it's not all that easy to do. The rethugs seem not to be allowing replacements. >Still, if the worst the repugs can say about Obama is that he's >not cleaning up *their* mess fast enough, well, it doesn't exactly >reflect well on them. Anything to destroy. -- Cliff
From: Cliff on 22 May 2010 00:30 On Tue, 18 May 2010 17:52:49 -0400, Harold Burton <hal.i.burton(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >In article <n7o2v5pq6045mld6bak2bchc74dnhv9lst(a)4ax.com>, > Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote: > > >> What part of "Find those "WMDs" yet?" seems unclear to you? > > > >What part of: What part of "Find those "WMDs" yet?" seems unclear to you? -- Cliff
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: More leftards whining about Sarah Next: Jesus was a violent person, Buddha was not |