Marketing gone terribly wrong
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: How Consumers are often overcharged
Next: WHAT IN GOD'S NAME IS KEEPING BUSH, CHENEY OUT OF PRISON?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 7 May 2010 12:09 "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message news:tMCdnTliy73GpXnWnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d(a)ptd.net... > Apparently Joe$#itForBrains believes that adhering to the Constitution, as > does Beck, is a bad thing. You're obviously drunk. That's the only way to read what I wrote and come to such a conclusion. > He must be one who believes the right to bear arms was included in the > Constitution so we could go hunting. Why would I give money to the NRA if that's what I believed about the right to bear arms? I don't hunt. I carry a gun in order to kill if I need to. You need to stop drinking. Seriously. You really do.
From: Jeff Strickland on 7 May 2010 13:06 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:KWWEn.6998$Gx2.6451(a)newsfe20.iad... > >> He must be one who believes the right to bear arms was included in the >> Constitution so we could go hunting. > > Why would I give money to the NRA if that's what I believed about the > right to bear arms? I don't hunt. I carry a gun in order to kill if I need > to. > The fact that they allow you to have a gun proves we need more gun laws.
From: Jeff Strickland on 7 May 2010 13:08 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:KWWEn.6998$Gx2.6451(a)newsfe20.iad... > "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message > news:tMCdnTliy73GpXnWnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d(a)ptd.net... >> Apparently Joe$#itForBrains believes that adhering to the Constitution, >> as does Beck, is a bad thing. > > You're obviously drunk. That's the only way to read what I wrote and come > to such a conclusion. > > >> He must be one who believes the right to bear arms was included in the >> Constitution so we could go hunting. > > Why would I give money to the NRA if that's what I believed about the > right to bear arms? I don't hunt. I carry a gun in order to kill if I need > to. > You know that you sight down the little hole, and you squeeze the trigger with your thumb, right?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 7 May 2010 13:09 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hs1hc6$vom$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:KWWEn.6998$Gx2.6451(a)newsfe20.iad... >> >>> He must be one who believes the right to bear arms was included in the >>> Constitution so we could go hunting. >> >> Why would I give money to the NRA if that's what I believed about the >> right to bear arms? I don't hunt. I carry a gun in order to kill if I >> need to. >> > > The fact that they allow you to have a gun proves we need more gun laws. That would be unconstitutional. You are a hypocrite for suggesting more gun laws.
From: Jeff Strickland on 7 May 2010 13:18
"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:1PXEn.7003$Gx2.6589(a)newsfe20.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hs1hc6$vom$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:KWWEn.6998$Gx2.6451(a)newsfe20.iad... >>> >>>> He must be one who believes the right to bear arms was included in >>>> the Constitution so we could go hunting. >>> >>> Why would I give money to the NRA if that's what I believed about the >>> right to bear arms? I don't hunt. I carry a gun in order to kill if I >>> need to. >>> >> >> The fact that they allow you to have a gun proves we need more gun laws. > > > That would be unconstitutional. You are a hypocrite for suggesting more > gun laws. > We only need one more gun law, IT IS HEREBY ILLEGAL FOR JOESHITFORBRAINS TO HAVE A GUN. I have no issue with Gun Laws if they are people-centric. A law that defines a particular class of persons not permitted to have a gun is okay. You, for example, or violent felons -- ex-felons, technically becase a felon is still behind bars where nobody gets to have a gun -- and perhaps mental patients. When a gun restriction is centered on the gun itself, then the gun is later defined as something where stuff comes out of one end at high speed, then a BB gun fits that definition and all guns can be held under that restriction. When the restrictions are people centric, then all I have to do is show that I'm not you, not a violent ex-felon, or a mental patient. The restriction, in this instance, is well defined and targetted and can never be construed to apply to reasonable persons. Of course, you will have nothing of value to add, and I just wasted my time. Again. |