Marketing gone terribly wrong
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: How Consumers are often overcharged
Next: WHAT IN GOD'S NAME IS KEEPING BUSH, CHENEY OUT OF PRISON?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 6 May 2010 18:15 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hrv6la$7h4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:OpEEn.1$rU6.0(a)newsfe10.iad... >> Or, how to hack off one of your arms by assuming your paid members all >> think the same way: >> >> > > <I went ahead and snipped the content about the NRA changing keynote > speakers from Hannity to Beck> > > > Are you suggesting that Hannity listeners and Beck listeners are not the > same and both are equally likely to support the NRA, or that NRA members > listen to Hannity but not Beck, or vice versa? > > What are you talking about, because you are making no sense. > > I don't see any indication that the NRA is hacking off an arm because the > keynote speaker has to be changed. > > I would agree that Hannity and Beck have different world views, but I > think the average card carrying member of the NRA will enjoy either of > them. > > So, what are you saying? > It's a mistake to use ANY entertainer/comedian to represent an organization as important as the NRA. Almost as big a mistake as having a senile actor as its figurehead, while handling a firearm in a manner which violates the first of the NRA's own gun safety rules. I give the NRA money every year, by the way.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 6 May 2010 18:15 "Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message news:hrv8d2$q2j$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > On 2010-05-06 12:51:51 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> > said: > >> So, what are you saying? > > Nothing whatsoever. As usual. > Oh boy. I'm sure it made Jeff's day to have your support once again.
From: Jeff Strickland on 6 May 2010 18:23 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:haHEn.23$rU6.4(a)newsfe10.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hrv6pq$7u1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:1_EEn.5$rU6.1(a)newsfe10.iad... >>> That's what you WISH I was saying because all you can come up with in >>> your drunken stupor. >>> >> >> Ironically, HIS drunken stupor is far more lucid than yours. The funny >> thing is that you have the gumption to suggest that anybody makes less >> sense than you. > > > Hunter's mistake is that he thinks Beck is a coherent advocate for the > constitution. Beck is an entertainer and nothing else. > Yes, Beck is an entertainer with an advocacy for the Constitution. Whatever Beck is, you still haven't answered why you think the NRA has hacked its arm off. Whatever Mike has said is far more intelligent than what you have said.
From: Jeff Strickland on 6 May 2010 18:25 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:YbHEn.24$rU6.12(a)newsfe10.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hrv6la$7h4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:OpEEn.1$rU6.0(a)newsfe10.iad... >>> Or, how to hack off one of your arms by assuming your paid members all >>> think the same way: >>> >>> >> >> <I went ahead and snipped the content about the NRA changing keynote >> speakers from Hannity to Beck> >> >> >> Are you suggesting that Hannity listeners and Beck listeners are not the >> same and both are equally likely to support the NRA, or that NRA members >> listen to Hannity but not Beck, or vice versa? >> >> What are you talking about, because you are making no sense. >> >> I don't see any indication that the NRA is hacking off an arm because the >> keynote speaker has to be changed. >> >> I would agree that Hannity and Beck have different world views, but I >> think the average card carrying member of the NRA will enjoy either of >> them. >> >> So, what are you saying? >> > > > It's a mistake to use ANY entertainer/comedian to represent an > organization as important as the NRA. Almost as big a mistake as having a > senile actor as its figurehead, while handling a firearm in a manner which > violates the first of the NRA's own gun safety rules. > > That's absurd.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 6 May 2010 18:27
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hrvfhm$ata$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:haHEn.23$rU6.4(a)newsfe10.iad... >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:hrv6pq$7u1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>> news:1_EEn.5$rU6.1(a)newsfe10.iad... >>>> That's what you WISH I was saying because all you can come up with in >>>> your drunken stupor. >>>> >>> >>> Ironically, HIS drunken stupor is far more lucid than yours. The funny >>> thing is that you have the gumption to suggest that anybody makes less >>> sense than you. >> >> >> Hunter's mistake is that he thinks Beck is a coherent advocate for the >> constitution. Beck is an entertainer and nothing else. >> > > > Yes, Beck is an entertainer with an advocacy for the Constitution. > Whatever Beck is, you still haven't answered why you think the NRA has > hacked its arm off. If you spend some time (like a year) watching gun discussion groups (which you won't do), you'll find quite a few NRA members who are unhappy with the organization's tendency to use sensational spokesmen. But I suppose the NRA is just a microcosm of America, where a boring, literate message simply doesn't hold people's attention. |