Marketing gone terribly wrong
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: How Consumers are often overcharged
Next: WHAT IN GOD'S NAME IS KEEPING BUSH, CHENEY OUT OF PRISON?
From: Jeff Strickland on 6 May 2010 19:59 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:sIIEn.60$rU6.37(a)newsfe10.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hrvkv8$se7$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message >> news:hrvjsh$s5a$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> >>>> BLANKET >>>> I made that part up. Really, I did. >>> >>> Not to speak of the blanket besting his I.Q. >>> >> >> ... by a wide margin. > > > Who is the senile actor I referred to earlier? > I have no doubt that YOU don't even know who or what you're talking about.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 6 May 2010 20:08 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hrvl33$slp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:ghIEn.44$rU6.20(a)newsfe10.iad... >> Who is the senile actor I referred to earlier? >> > > > Who cares. You started out talking about Hannity and Beck. You can't > support your attack on these fine Americans, so you change the topic. I'll > hazard a guess that you can't support your attack on this fine American > either. The senile actor was a third example of a lousy spokesman for the NRA, and you said you knew who he was. Your refusal to type his name is childish. But you probably don't know his name, so earlier, you lied yet again when you typed (with drunken punctuation) "I know whom you are referring to, I don't know - or care - what you're referring to."
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 6 May 2010 20:24 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hrvm0u$vdn$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... > b.. actor Charlton Heston Very good. Now explain why the allowed a senile man to represent the organization while waving a rifle in the air like a lunatic. Kids at my gun club *always* commented on the poster, saying they'd be thrown out of the gun club for doing what Heston did. The picture proved that the organization often shoots itself in the foot when it comes to presenting its image. There is no possible way to argue against what I just said.
From: Mike Hunter on 7 May 2010 11:50 And you wonder why we call you Joe$#itForBrains? LOL "Joe$#itForBrains" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:1_EEn.5$rU6.1(a)newsfe10.iad... > That's what you WISH I was saying because all you can come up with in your > drunken stupor. > > > > "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message > news:UL6dnVHNCfclhn7WnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d(a)ptd.net... >> Are you saying you do not believe that BO, and the Dims in Congress, >> should be following the Constitution, as envisioned by the founders, as >> Glenn Beck and the members of the NRA believe they should, >> Joe$#itForBrains? >> >> >> "Joe$#itForBrains" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:OpEEn.1$rU6.0(a)newsfe10.iad... >>> Or, how to hack off one of your arms by assuming your paid members all >>> think the same way: >>> >>> (FAIRFAX) - The National Rifle Association announced today that radio >>> and television personality and best selling author Glenn Beck will be >>> the keynote speaker for the "Freedom Experience" at NRA's 139th Annual >>> Meetings & Exhibits in Charlotte, North Carolina. Beck will now deliver >>> the keynote address of the event, which begins at 6:30 pm on Saturday, >>> May 15, at the Time Warner Cable Arena. As previously announced, Sean >>> Hannity was to be the keynote speaker, but had an unforeseen schedule >>> conflict. NRA's Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre in welcoming >>> Beck said, "It's going to be a great convention, and I know our members >>> will be excited to see and to hear from Glenn Beck." >>> >> >> > >
From: Mike Hunter on 7 May 2010 11:56
Apparently Joe$#itForBrains believes that adhering to the Constitution, as does Beck, is a bad thing. He must be one who believes the right to bear arms was included in the Constitution so we could go hunting. Our friend Joe$#itForBrains wonders why we call him Joe$#itForBrains "Joe$#itForBrains" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:ynHEn.28$rU6.18(a)newsfe10.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hrvfhm$ata$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "Joe$#itForBrains" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:haHEn.23$rU6.4(a)newsfe10.iad... >>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:hrv6pq$7u1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> >>>> "Joe$#itForBrains" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>>> news:1_EEn.5$rU6.1(a)newsfe10.iad... >>>>> That's what you WISH I was saying because all you can come up with in >>>>> your drunken stupor. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ironically, HIS drunken stupor is far more lucid than yours. The funny >>>> thing is that you have the gumption to suggest that anybody makes less >>>> sense than you. >>> >>> >>> Hunter's mistake is that he thinks Beck is a coherent advocate for the >>> constitution. Beck is an entertainer and nothing else. >>> >> >> >> Yes, Beck is an entertainer with an advocacy for the Constitution. >> Whatever Beck is, you still haven't answered why you think the NRA has >> hacked its arm off. > > > If you spend some time (like a year) watching gun discussion groups (which > you won't do), you'll find quite a few NRA members who are unhappy with > the organization's tendency to use sensational spokesmen. But I suppose > the NRA is just a microcosm of America, where a boring, literate message > simply doesn't hold people's attention. > |