From: Wayne on

"john" <johngdole(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2cdea3ae-02f4-4315-a3f7-64b2a1b254b6(a)15g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
>November 26, 2009
>Howes: Toyota not looking so shiny now
>DANIEL HOWES
>
>Is the Toyota Motor Corp. juggernaut losing its conqueror-of-the-world
>mojo?
>
>Because if it was a Detroit automaker that was recalling 4.26 million
>vehicles to repair accelerator problems, or if it was a Detroit
>automaker that had broken its historic no-plant-closings pledge, or if
>it was a Detroit automaker that had recalled more vehicles (2.38
>million) in 2005 than it sold in the United States that year (2.26
>million), the answer would be an emphatic yes.
-
So what do you propose? Buy a GM car instead of a Toyota?
<snort>


From: someone on
In article <elmop-3BCE6A.19333226112009(a)nothing.attdns.com>, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>In article <osEPm.272817$Jp1.81678(a)en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com>,
> someone(a)some.domain (someone(a)some.domain) wrote:
>
>> >Maybe you mean harakiri?
>> seppeku is the correct name.
>> the other is stupid slang.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harakiri
>
>The most famous form of seppuku is also known as harakiri (y�R�0,
>"cutting the belly") and is written with the same kanji as seppuku but
>in reverse order with an okurigana. In Japanese, the more formal
>seppuku, a Chinese on'yomi reading, is typically used in writing, while
>harakiri, a native kun'yomi reading, is used in speech.

exactly, "common useage" for the peasants.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:13:00 -0800, Wayne wrote:

>
> "john" <johngdole(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2cdea3ae-02f4-4315-a3f7-64b2a1b254b6(a)15g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
>>November 26, 2009
>>Howes: Toyota not looking so shiny now DANIEL HOWES
>>
>>Is the Toyota Motor Corp. juggernaut losing its conqueror-of-the-world
>>mojo?
>>
>>Because if it was a Detroit automaker that was recalling 4.26 million
>>vehicles to repair accelerator problems, or if it was a Detroit automaker
>>that had broken its historic no-plant-closings pledge, or if it was a
>>Detroit automaker that had recalled more vehicles (2.38 million) in 2005
>>than it sold in the United States that year (2.26 million), the answer
>>would be an emphatic yes.
> -
> So what do you propose? Buy a GM car instead of a Toyota? <snort>

Regardless of problems, I think Toyota will be around for a LONG time to
make good on their cars.

I'm giving GM to the end of the year. THIS year...



From: Steve Austin on
Wayne wrote:
> "john" <johngdole(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2cdea3ae-02f4-4315-a3f7-64b2a1b254b6(a)15g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
>> November 26, 2009
>> Howes: Toyota not looking so shiny now
>> DANIEL HOWES
>>
>> Is the Toyota Motor Corp. juggernaut losing its conqueror-of-the-world
>> mojo?
>>
>> Because if it was a Detroit automaker that was recalling 4.26 million
>> vehicles to repair accelerator problems, or if it was a Detroit
>> automaker that had broken its historic no-plant-closings pledge, or if
>> it was a Detroit automaker that had recalled more vehicles (2.38
>> million) in 2005 than it sold in the United States that year (2.26
>> million), the answer would be an emphatic yes.
> -
> So what do you propose? Buy a GM car instead of a Toyota?
> <snort>
>
>
Now that Toyota is giving away the dealer scan tool, I would get a GM
instead? Ha!
From: z on
<someone(a)some.domain> wrote in message
news:%8CPm.279529$Jp1.66565(a)en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com...
> In article
> <d9b14ab6-de86-4e4b-9b0f-b323f98f7409(a)r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> phaeton <blahbleh666(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This isn't new, either, suggesting that Toyota's troubles may be more
>>> of a developing pattern than a one-time aberration. Two years ago,
>>> before two-thirds of Detroit's automakers were tempered by the fires
>>> of bankruptcy, the editor of the ostensibly "Japanese-loving" Consumer
>>> Reports apologized to readers for recommending the problem-plagued
>>> Camry V-6.
>>>
>>> He also said the magazine had decided new Toyota models could no
>>> longer be given the benefit of the doubt -- or its prized
>>> "recommended" label. And Toyota's V-8 powered Tundra four-wheel drive
>>> pickup was labeled "unreliable" by the magazine, the unofficial Bible
>>> to discerning car and truck buyers.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I always take everything Consumer Reports says with a grain of salt.
>
> yeah, a 50 mile square grain.

I have my own theory about Consumer Reports Ratings, when the ratings are a
reflection of public response - who responds to the typical survey? Who
writes letter to the editor? Who calls a corporate complaint/compliment
line? Those who are not happy. So, in my own little not so humble opinion,
CR public response ratings are skewed to the negative.