Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO
in [Toyota Trucks]
|
From: Desertphile on 2 Aug 2008 09:01 On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT), virig <virginia.wats(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Water fueled cars are a reality and many people are using this > technology to save money and improve the environment. Also known as "Fraud." Please look up this scam via Google. -- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: someone on 2 Aug 2008 23:05 In article <2ht8945f2b7il4m547960haqqd00so184k(a)4ax.com>, Sir F. A. Rien <jaSPAMc(a)gbr.online.com> wrote: >Desertphile <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> found these unused words: > >>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT), virig >><virginia.wats(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Water fueled cars are a reality and many people are using this >>> technology to save money and improve the environment. >> >>Also known as "Fraud." Please look up this scam via Google. > >Long been proved that the breakdown of H2O into HHO uses more energy than it >gives back when 'utilized'. The energy used in the origination of the >breakdown simple generates more pollution, just in a different place! > >It's akin to the "non-polluting" electric! The pollution is incurred at the >generating facility, rather than at the using end of the chain. > >IF the libs and greenies would GOTDA, then perhaps nuclear generation could >make it efficient to have electric powered vehicles for city and suburb. > don't bother. these talking turds are just spam scum trying to pick your pocket. no brains AND no balls.
From: Desertphile on 4 Aug 2008 13:37 On Aug 2, 9:03 am, Sir F. A. Rien <jaSP...(a)gbr.online.com> wrote: > Desertphile <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> found these unused words: > > >On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT), virig > ><virginia.w...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Water fueled cars are a reality and many people are using this > >> technology to save money and improve the environment. > > >Also known as "Fraud." Please look up this scam via Google. > > Long been proved that the breakdown of H2O into HHO uses more energy than it > gives back when 'utilized'. The energy used in the origination of the > breakdown simple generates more pollution, just in a different place! > > It's akin to the "non-polluting" electric! The pollution is incurred at the > generating facility, rather than at the using end of the chain. > > IF the libs and greenies would GOTDA, then perhaps nuclear generation could > make it efficient to have electric powered vehicles for city and suburb. I don't know what "libs and greenies" are (presumably a regulatory agency), but the reason nuclear generators are so expensive is due to the waste involved and the hazards of moving that waste. There are many evil bastards in YouTube trying to defraud people with the "HOH" scam, claiming the process will save money in gasoline costs--- but mostly the scam is for "investors" to buy into the scam. Perhaps "clean coal" is the way to go at the moment, for the next 40 or 50 years.
From: Fuller Wrath on 4 Aug 2008 20:37 nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill for GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values" "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:76bf4817-aa9c-4c8b-8ec5-ce9233affe5c(a)c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 2, 9:03 am, Sir F. A. Rien <jaSP...(a)gbr.online.com> wrote: >> Desertphile <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> found these unused words: >> >> >On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT), virig >> ><virginia.w...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Water fueled cars are a reality and many people are using this >> >> technology to save money and improve the environment. >> >> >Also known as "Fraud." Please look up this scam via Google. >> >> Long been proved that the breakdown of H2O into HHO uses more energy than >> it >> gives back when 'utilized'. The energy used in the origination of the >> breakdown simple generates more pollution, just in a different place! >> >> It's akin to the "non-polluting" electric! The pollution is incurred at >> the >> generating facility, rather than at the using end of the chain. >> >> IF the libs and greenies would GOTDA, then perhaps nuclear generation >> could >> make it efficient to have electric powered vehicles for city and suburb. > > I don't know what "libs and greenies" are (presumably a regulatory > agency), but the reason nuclear generators are so expensive is due to > the waste involved and the hazards of moving that waste. There are > many evil bastards in YouTube trying to defraud people with the "HOH" > scam, claiming the process will save money in gasoline costs--- but > mostly the scam is for "investors" to buy into the scam. > > Perhaps "clean coal" is the way to go at the moment, for the next 40 > or 50 years.
From: Desertphile on 5 Aug 2008 09:53
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:37:38 -0700, "Fuller Wrath" <boogerpicker(a)wazoo.net> wrote: > nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the > public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill for > GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values" Er, corndogs and book shelves are also "subsidized by the public:" it's called "capitalism." The topic of this article thread is the HOH scam, not atomic power plants. -- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz |