From: Fuller Wrath on 10 Aug 2008 14:08 Okay moronicus, Are your eyes brown? They must be because you are full of it. Nuclear power is the least cost effective and most environmentally toxic power source available. I suppose we can dispose of the waste by-products in your back yard because no one else wants them. Check out the Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act. It lets the nuclear industry off the hook when one of their time bombs melts down. And what does FRANCE do with their nuclear waste? They glassify is which is fine for a few hundred years. Then what? it becomes highly toxic. Your arguments are typical talking points of an informed right wing toady. I prefer to cite Three Mile Island and Chernobyl models. Much more realistic. Stop sucking on Rushbo's teat and try thinking of an alternative to a toxic power source. No one ever died from exposure to solar or wind power. The only reason they are in an arrested state of development is because butt poodle conservatives have been on their knees to the big oil boys for fifty years. No, I think you are the one full of shite. "Sir Loin of Crotch" <jaSPAMc(a)gbr.online.com> wrote in message news:ojlg94hf1f9lvvhfbkabnubacgbodktlr2(a)4ax.com... > "Fuller Wrath" <boogerpicker(a)wazoo.net> found these unused words: > >>nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the >>public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill for >>GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values" >> > Really ... then how do you explain the safe, continued use of nuclear > systems by countries as FRANCE (who hates everything american!), UK and > Germany, not to mention several other countries, now getting a third or > more > of their electicity from NUCLEAR PLANTS? > > ALL electric plants are 'totally subsidized' by the public as it is a > SERVICE to them! Do try and understand how things function, eh? > > Is nuclear power more expensive than wind? Do some checking befor you > pan, > as to the costs of alternatives! > > Is this all because you're 'fuller wrath' rather than 'fuller brains'? >
From: Fuller Wrath on 10 Aug 2008 14:08 Another brain fart oozes forth "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message news:ofmg94l6ufpm477ojajcr7u2tu537ejlvk(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:37:38 -0700, "Fuller Wrath" > <boogerpicker(a)wazoo.net> wrote: > >> nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the >> public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill >> for >> GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values" > > Er, corndogs and book shelves are also "subsidized by the public:" > it's called "capitalism." > > The topic of this article thread is the HOH scam, not atomic power > plants. > > > -- > http://desertphile.org > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Desertphile on 11 Aug 2008 00:01
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:08:56 -0700, "Fuller Wrath" <boogerpicker(a)wazoo.net> wrote: > Another brain fart oozes forth You shouldn't take so much pride in your "brain farts" in public: it's embarassing. > "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message > news:ofmg94l6ufpm477ojajcr7u2tu537ejlvk(a)4ax.com... > > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:37:38 -0700, "Fuller Wrath" > > <boogerpicker(a)wazoo.net> wrote: > > > >> nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the > >> public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill > >> for > >> GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values" > > > > Er, corndogs and book shelves are also "subsidized by the public:" > > it's called "capitalism." > > > > The topic of this article thread is the HOH scam, not atomic power > > plants. > > > > > > -- > > http://desertphile.org > > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz > -- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz |