Choosing a laptop mount for the car?
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: {BS} LOL! Check the comments!
Next: Driverless Cars
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 27 Mar 2010 21:20 On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:01:59 -0700, §ñühw¤£f wrote: > Hachiroku ???? pinched a steaming load of this: >> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:56:12 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>> So, what do you think you are winning, specifically? >>>>> >>>> He's vehwy competitive...heh heh heh heh... >>> Not so much *comptetive* as obsessive. >> >> That's why you've started crossposting from other groups into Toyota. >> > Dude, I tolja to lock yer car... > > Word. The bastards smashed the windows and stole it anyway... I KNEW I shoulda wired the coil to the gearshift...
From: Rocky on 27 Mar 2010 23:11 On Mar 27, 4:55 pm, Jane Galt <Jan...(a)gulch.xyz> wrote: > > Well I have the laptop so need to use it now. Fair enough. > A friend suggested a tablet awhile back but never did tell me what she meant > by that, or suggest a model to look at. So I got the laptop. Yes, what model tablet is a problem because the battery doesn't last very long on some of the older tablet computers like the Compaq TC1100 and on some of the newer tablets computers with a touch screen like the TX2000 writing on them can be a problem because you can't rest your hand on the screen. And if you want a really good Tablet computer like one made by Motion Computing you will probably pay an arm and a leg for it. http://www.motioncomputing.com/products/tablet_pc_J34.asp BTW a Tablet computer with builtin bluetooth can easily be used with a bluetooth mouse or bluetooth keyboard and even get the internet from a cell phone. BTW the old Motion Computing LE1700 comes with GPS software that works with a bluetooth GPS and it is spooky how well it can track your every move.
From: Aratzio on 28 Mar 2010 00:36 On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:21:47 -0400, in the land of 24hoursupport.helpdesk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:13:02 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>Right over his head. And a classic response to boot. >> >> The classic response is required when responding to someone so lame they >> use a Mommy Lame as their most scathing response. > >Wanted to make sure it was understood. You claimed it wasn't a mommy lame. Now you claim it is. So stupid you can't remember what you write one message to the next. > >> >>>Are you a bot with every retort from the past 20 years in your database? >>> >>> >> Thinks for admitting I would have 20 years of original responses in a >> database. > >Who said anything about 'original'? Well, that would be me, you illiterate clot. >> >> You: 0 > >You: in the negative numbers. "I know you are but what am I" > >> >> BTW: it is a lot more than 20 years. > >And you're still acting the same. > Were you expecting that the response to lamers would be nicer all these years later, lamer?
From: Aratzio on 28 Mar 2010 00:37 On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:22:36 -0400, in the land of 24hoursupport.helpdesk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:56:12 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>> So, what do you think you are winning, specifically? >>>> >>>He's vehwy competitive...heh heh heh heh... >> >> Not so much *comptetive* as obsessive. > >That's why you've started crossposting from other groups into Toyota. > > That was to make you whine like a little crybaby.
From: Aratzio on 28 Mar 2010 00:39
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:23:40 -0400, in the land of 24hoursupport.helpdesk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:51:28 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:14:53 -0400, in the land of 24hoursupport.helpdesk, >> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:56:38 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>Wow. Four retorts in one night! To what do we owe the "honor"? Got your >>>>>homework done early, so Mommy gave you extra time? (Yup. Mommy lame. >>>>>Lames are all you seem to understand.) >>>> >>>> MADE YOU POST LAME!!!!! >>> >>>Yup. And it works every single time, doesn't it? >>> >>> >> Proving once more how stupid you are. > >At least with me it isn't obviously apparent with every post. > I am sure it is possible that someone somewhere once thought you wrote a post that was not stupid. But it is good that you are coming to realize that you are stupid. |