From: ~BD~ on
Aardvark wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:30:16 -0500, Jane Galt wrote:
>
>> The result of government ownership of the media?
>
> Where is this fictional country you're talking about where the government
> owns the media?
>
> Hint: carefully read and digest the fourth word of my question.
>


Yet *another* late night!

What *would* your mum have said, eh? ;)
From: Aratzio on
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:09:48 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:19:13 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:11:39 -0400, in the land of 24hoursupport.helpdesk,
>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:50:42 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Glad to. Oh, you win. Feel superior now?
>>>>
>>>> Felt superior to you at the outset, toyotatard.
>>>
>>>Sure. Same old lame insults. Nice try.
>>
>> And for the third time:
>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>
>Inability to follow along. Why am I not surprised?

So you imagine pointing out that you have specifically used the same
tactic a specific number of times is proof of not following along? Was
I wrong and you have used the same lame more than 3 times while you
were snipping and running from anything substantive?

>
>>
>> You haven't had even a single original thought in your entire life. If it
>> isn't told you by some wingnut on the radio or faux news you wouldn't even
>> have opinions.
>
>At least Ihave opinions.

And shockingly, toyotatard proves his failure to follow along after
whining that counting specific instances are not following along.

Welcome to the world of wingnut thought.

>Who needs Fox? Or talk radio.

Your slightly betters, they at least are smart enough to recognize
their inability to produce anything functional with regard to thought.

>Even a jackass like you should be able to form some kind of an opinion of what's going on.

"I know you are but what am I?"
Well, it appears that 3 was just the opening salvo of lame.

>But I doubt it. Too busy acting all smart on Usenet. Prime example of
>needing a life.

It so good of you to notice my acting skills. I spent several years in
acting smart school. They even gave me an award when I graduated from
acting smart school. Which then left me with the whole "having a
career" where I needed to act smart professionally and get money for
acting smart. I know it sucks for people like me who have gone to
acting smart school to pick on you poor dropouts of "hoping to go to
acting smart school".

>
>How many times did you hit refresh while I was away, Gonzo?

Wow, that must have left a mark on you when I used it on you.

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:29:12 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

>>Even a jackass like you should be able to form some kind of an opinion of
>>what's going on.
>
> "I know you are but what am I?"
> Well, it appears that 3 was just the opening salvo of lame.

Good response. Fact is, as usual, you jump in with absolutely nothing to
add to the topic (see the header to determine the topic. I trust you are
able to do that?)

<Marlin Perkins whisper mode>
But, do keep coming back so you can impress yourself, since you aren't
doing a very good job of impressing anyone else. I suspect your mother
ripped you from her breast while you were trying to suckle, inflicting a
terrible trauma on your young psyche. Most plausible reason why you feel
the need to impress people using your keyboard, since it has becoome
fairly obvious quite a while ago it's something you can't accomplish in
real life.

<whisper mode off>

See? I can do it too! "Marlin"

BTW, most of your audience has plonked you, so do keep trying to impress...

no one but yourself.



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:58:41 +0000, Bucky Breeder wrote:

> Sarah Palin has nice boobies = 36%

This number should be higher...



From: Bucky Breeder on
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?=
<Trueno(a)e86.GTS> via
news:hobf32$cbm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:

> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:58:41 +0000, Bucky Breeder wrote:
>
>> Sarah Palin has nice boobies = 36%
>
> This number should be higher...


And the adjective *should* *be* "sweet"...
(for an old lady, they *sure* are perky!)

.... but that's the paradigm of my prol'lem
with the Faux Noose Crooze... They just
make stuff up and then post some charts
and stuff, then people actually buy it...
and quote it as foundation for more vitreol.

??? Are we human, or are we dancer ???

Faux Noose = "All your dancer are belong to us!"

AKA, "If you get stitches for that cut, then
you're a COMMUNIST!" "Take those vitamins, and
you're slidin' down the slippery slope to
socialism and the liberal Kool Aid machine."

Yeah, *real* Americans drink Pepsi... and don't
make no excuses about it either. No apologies
here... and now for a break from our sponsors...

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; ; and *NO*,
that is NOT a Jedi light-sabre in my pocket;
and nope, I'm NOT particularly "happy" to see you.

Repent! The end is near....
So, smoke 'em if you got 'em.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Prev: {BS} LOL! Check the comments!
Next: Driverless Cars