Chomsky: 92% believe Obama leads the country "toward socialism"
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: ED CONRAD DISCOVERS THE MISSING STINK
Next: The day I bought a Toyota... A day that will live in infamy!
From: Cliff on 2 May 2010 11:26 On Sat, 01 May 2010 17:19:37 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Sat, 01 May 2010 13:38:00 -0400, Cliff wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:56:15 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:11:30 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, >>>Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >>>>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:42:59 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> The 92% figure is from a New York Times / CBS News poll survey which >>>>>>> only included tea party members as respondants--a group which fewer >>>>>>> than 20% of Americans identify themselves as being in support of. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>Your spin doesn't invalidate the whole truth. In another 2.5 years he >>>>>>will be defeated and we can begin to restore our country to its >>>>>>rightful place. >>>>> >>>>> In the ditch where the Republicans left it. A brilliant plan. >>>> >>>>Not quite. Out of the ditch Obama is dragging it into. >>>> >>>>God, are you blind, or what? >>>> >>>> >>>So, the US economy on Jan, 20 2009, better than now or worse than now? >>> >>>GDP in Jan 2009, better or worse than now? >>> >>>Job losses in Jan 2009 better or worse than now? >>> >>>Taxes for 95% of Americans, better or worse than Jan. 2009? >>> >>>Health insurance for children with prexisting conditions better or worse >>>than in Jan 2009. >>> >>>The only thing I see worse is the deficit and I don't see an alternative >>>in the short term. >>> >>>So, go ahead, make you case how much worse off you are now than in Jan, >>>2009. >> >> <dead silence from the wingers> > >Shhh...i'm trying to ignore the Chowderhead... IOW You have nothing. >Now, in answer: economy: no change. Unlike total collapse? Or were you thinking of the ~12% increase in GDP growth rate? Or the increase in stock values? Or home sales? Or other sales? Or the increase in exports? >Unemployment: gain (mostly because of Census hiring) I've heard of many working a lot of overtime ... plus the rate of job losses is about neutral now. Could have easily been 80% unemployment. Or worse. >Taxes: worse. Oh, you mean INCOME taxes! That's about the same. Except for the Obama tax cuts. >But when >you look at the other taxes Obungler and his lot have either piled on or >are planning to pile on, worse. IOW You have nothing. >So you're not paying it in income tax, >you're paying it somewhere else. But you don't know where .... What did Faux & Rush tell you? -- Cliff
From: Cliff on 2 May 2010 11:27 On Sat, 01 May 2010 17:20:32 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >On Sat, 01 May 2010 13:28:39 -0400, Cliff wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:32:48 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> >>>Aw, c'mon! We NEED to have the leader of the Free World grovel and bow to >>>other leaders! >> >> OTOH We have a polite, well-studied person who is >> respected worldwide following custom. >> OTOH We had an idiot that tried to open walls, give backrubs & fell >> down a lot. > >Grovellers go far. Did herr shrubbie ever find his way out? -- Cliff
From: PrecisionmachinisT on 2 May 2010 13:55 "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message news:d16rt5p800td6qb7sbaf8rcj372n80o2h9(a)4ax.com... > > What did Faux & Rush tell you? > Lies.
From: Wok Dissuade on 3 May 2010 22:22 More like 96% now.
From: Wok Dissuade on 3 May 2010 22:24
Now bck art 99%.5 |