From: Gunner Asch on
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:55 -0500, "The Whole Truth"
<whole(a)wholetruth.foo> wrote:

>
>
>"PrecisionmachinisT" <precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote in message
>news:KMWdnStIgJW080vWnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com...
>>
>> "The Whole Truth" <whole(a)wholetruth.foo> wrote in message
>> news:4bd66d54$1(a)news.x-privat.org...
>>>
>>>
>>> "PrecisionmachinisT" <precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:W-2dnS5A9LlK-kvWnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com...
>>> >
>>> > "The Whole Truth" <whole(a)wholetruth.foo> wrote in message
>>> > news:4bd66026$1(a)news.x-privat.org...
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> "PrecisionmachinisT" <precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote in message
>>> >> news:gZ6dnf-6r7pxxkvWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com...
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Well since you put it that way, here is a link to the pew research
>> poll
>>> >> > which is apparently the subject of much of Chomsky's commentary and
>>> >> > opinion
>>> >> > : http://people-press.org/report/606/trust-in-government
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The 92% figure is from a New York Times / CBS News poll survey which
>>> > only
>>> >> > included tea party members as respondants--a group which fewer than
>> 20%
>>> > of
>>> >> > Americans identify themselves as being in support of.
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Your spin doesn't invalidate the whole truth.
>>> >
>>> > Except...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yawn, you're boring me, hippy.
>>>
>>>
>> http://www.cafepress.com/cp/moredetails.aspx?showBleed=false&ProductNo=40247
>> 3881&colorNo=0&pr=F
>>>
>>
>> Oh, I see.
>>
>> It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team....
>
>That's for fags. I guess you were a master debater.


Nah..he was out in the parking lot getting stoned wth the rest of the
foolish.

Gunner

From: Gunner Asch on
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:23 -0800, "PrecisionmachinisT"
<precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>news:hr5pb2$qno$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:30:05 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote:
>>
>> >>> Which gets us back to the fundamental issue--Whereas liberals are open
>> >>> to change, conservatives are opposed to it.
>> >>
>> >> Dude, we are totally on board with change. Watch this November.
>> >
>> > http://journals.democraticunderground.com/NanceGreggs/572 Posted by
>> > NanceGreggs in General Discussion: Presidency Sat Apr 24th 2010, 07:38
>PM
>> >
>> > Despite what may seem to be overwhelming evidence to the contrary, not
>all
>> > of my countrymen are bigoted, homophobic, whackjobs. Really.
>>
>> Exactly. Some of us are Conservatives.
>>
>
>Oh, now I see.
>
>It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team....


Actually..I was on the debating team. And we won the league that year.

Gunner

From: Mike Hunter on
BO agrees, he was the one who was always saying that it is time for a change
in Washington ;)


"The Whole Truth" <whole(a)wholetruth.foo> wrote in message
news:4bd63540$2(a)news.x-privat.org...
>
>
> "PrecisionmachinisT" <precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote in message
> news:N42dnW4izMSGJkjWnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com...
>>
>>
>> Which gets us back to the fundamental issue--Whereas liberals are open to
>> change, conservatives are opposed to it.
>
> Dude, we are totally on board with change. Watch this November.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:23 -0800, PrecisionmachinisT wrote:

>
> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:hr5pb2$qno$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:30:05 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote:
>>
>> >>> Which gets us back to the fundamental issue--Whereas liberals are
>> >>> open to change, conservatives are opposed to it.
>> >>
>> >> Dude, we are totally on board with change. Watch this November.
>> >
>> > http://journals.democraticunderground.com/NanceGreggs/572 Posted by
>> > NanceGreggs in General Discussion: Presidency Sat Apr 24th 2010, 07:38
> PM
>> >
>> > Despite what may seem to be overwhelming evidence to the contrary, not
> all
>> > of my countrymen are bigoted, homophobic, whackjobs. Really.
>>
>> Exactly. Some of us are Conservatives.
>>
>>
> Oh, now I see.
>
> It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team....

On the contrary. I was the captain.


From: Uhh Clem on

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:hr7k4h$si2$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:23 -0800, PrecisionmachinisT wrote:
>
>>
>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>> news:hr5pb2$qno$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:30:05 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote:
>>>
>>> >>> Which gets us back to the fundamental issue--Whereas liberals are
>>> >>> open to change, conservatives are opposed to it.
>>> >>
>>> >> Dude, we are totally on board with change. Watch this November.
>>> >
>>> > http://journals.democraticunderground.com/NanceGreggs/572 Posted by
>>> > NanceGreggs in General Discussion: Presidency Sat Apr 24th 2010, 07:38
>> PM
>>> >
>>> > Despite what may seem to be overwhelming evidence to the contrary, not
>> all
>>> > of my countrymen are bigoted, homophobic, whackjobs. Really.
>>>
>>> Exactly. Some of us are Conservatives.
>>>
>>>
>> Oh, now I see.
>>
>> It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team....
>
> On the contrary. I was the captain.
>

Prove it.

--